devojit goswami
21 September 2008 at 08:20
The plaintiff filed a title suit mentioning the address of the defendant. Notice was sent. defendant responded to notice, filed written statement and contested the case.
In the first Appeal also notice was sent to the defendant in the same address. he responded to the notice and contested the appeal.
In the second appeal at the High Court also notice was sent in the same address of the defendant, but this time the notice was sent back with an endorsement of the postal department mentioning that the address was incorrect/addressee not found.
Is there any precedent that if notice is sent in the last known proper address and they are returned back with endorsements as mentioned above, notice can be deemed to have been served?
Kindly help me in this regard.
susanth nair s
21 September 2008 at 07:14
plz explain ingredients to be pleaded for easement by necessity with latest s.c ruling
Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
20 September 2008 at 22:29
What difference between sec.26(2) C.P.C. and order 6 Rule 15(4) c.p.c about affidavit
ARVIND JAIN
20 September 2008 at 14:42
CONSENT OF HUSBAND FOR ABORTION IS A MUST OR NOT ?ABORTION WITHOUT CONSENT OF HUSBAND IS CRUELTY OR NOT FOR DIVORCE UNDER HINDU MARRIAGE ACT,1955?
shivraj
19 September 2008 at 20:31
can first wife get equal right in coparceners property?
shivraj
19 September 2008 at 20:29
can one withness is allowed to two different registered document which happen in same day which is sale deed and will deed?
jagadish paranjape
19 September 2008 at 13:51
Dear sir,
Why computer generated documents do not
require signeture?How those documents
can be proved in courts?does Indian evidence Act has any provision in this
regard?
Regards.
Mansing patil
19 September 2008 at 12:56
Hi,
sir i want to know what is the mean of " V.P NOT FILLED"?
Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
19 September 2008 at 08:29
What difference between sec.26(2) C.P.C. and order 6 Rule 15(4) c.p.c about affidavit
service of notice
The plaintiff filed a title suit mentioning the address of the defendant. Notice was sent. defendant responded to notice, filed written statement and contested the case.
In the first Appeal also notice was sent to the defendant in the same address. he responded to the notice and contested the appeal.
In the second appeal at the High Court also notice was sent in the same address of the defendant, but this time the notice was sent back with an endorsement of the postal department mentioning that the address was incorrect/addressee not found.
Is there any precedent that if notice is sent in the last known proper address and they are returned back with endorsements as mentioned above, notice can be deemed to have been served?
Kindly help me in this regard.