Y V Vishweshwar Rao
23 July 2009 at 23:24
Dear Friends please verify and suggest the way out !
Father & Three Daughters (and wife) are a unit of HUF and holding vlauable Joint Family/Ancestral properties in several places . Father is suffering with mental disorder and he is in hospital since few years .
1-Whehter the Elder Married daughter( as Defined as Coparcener with equal rights that of son) can become the Kartha of the HUF and as HUF Kartha can sell the HUF proerties to impliment the Sale agreements executed by her father while he was in Sound and disposing state of mind .
2- Whehter Elder Married Daughter, as above , can represent the mentally effected father, in a Sale deed to be executed by her as Kartha / Adult member of HUF for herself and unsound Mind Father and HUF minor Sisters - with out any Cout permisison ?
Narasimha swamy N
23 July 2009 at 22:15
is there a time limit to file a suit for redemption to redeem the suit property.can it be filed even after 30 years as specified in Limitation Act?
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
23 July 2009 at 00:17
hello all learned experts
i read a judgement in the said judgement written in heading that first appeal no ....of 2000 civil application no .....of 2003 for stay so i would like to know that for the appearing in the claim case first of all a differnert application lies and after the decided the appeal allows pls giuide me it is the matter of guj h court regards
Amarjeet yadav
22 July 2009 at 18:47
can anyone plz pass the format of probate case?
it's urgent
Tarun Kalra LL.M, M.B.A
22 July 2009 at 06:12
is petition of section 9 of hma is maintanable from husband side, when the petition under section 125 crpc is alrready pending from the side of wife in the court. if yes then is it mandatory to metion the pending petition of 125 in the new petition of section 9 of hma? or to give any reference of pending petion of 125 crpc in new petition of section 9 hma?
plz solve
Rajasekar
21 July 2009 at 21:25
Can i fila a civil suit against the cellpnone operator seeking injunction against installing cellphone tower.
SHYAMSUNDAR
21 July 2009 at 18:08
Hello friends,
In a suit the plaintiff is a Banking Company. The Branch Manager has not filed the resolution to effect his authority to depose before the court nor any authority letter.
The suit is liable to be dismissed on this count.
Any case laws/citations.
Thanks in advance.
Y V Vishweshwar Rao
21 July 2009 at 15:35
I request lrd friends to Verify and suggest on the followign issue !
One X purchased 200 Square yards in 1990 under Sale agreement with Delivery of possession with Rs;- 100/- NJS - And again purchased 300 Square yards abuttign the said 200 square yards in the year 1998 under Sale Agrement with Delivery of possesison - NJS Rs;- 100/-
In the year 2005 the same vendor executed & Registered Sale deed with reference to the sale agreements of 1990 & 1998 and delivery of possession in the year 1990 & 1998 , in favour of the same Vendee in respect of the both Sale agreemtns( consolidated ) for 500 square yards and required stamp duty is paid on Registered sale Deed as per 2005 rates
Now in a Suit the Regd Sale deed of 2005 , Sale agreements of 1990 & 1998 are filed to prove the dates of transactions & Delivery fo possession as in 1990 & 1998 and delivery of possession to the purchaser .
The Regd Sale deed of 2005 is marked . The sale agreements of 1990 & 1998 with delivery of possession are objected for want of Stamp duty & Penalties & required to be imopounded indipendently .In fact in the sale Deed of 2005 entire stamp duty was paid as per 2005 rates (though sale considerations in 1990 & 1998 were very less)
Whther, the Sale agreement of 1990 & 1998 with delivery of possession, have to be indipendently impounded, inspite of Registration of Sale deed in 2005 on the same land/s and transactions between the same parties ?
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
20 July 2009 at 22:47
HELO ALL LRD EXPERTS
A VEHICAL WAS PARKED WITH THE ON INDICATER IN THE MORNING ON THE DRIVER SIDE MEANS LEFT SIDE ANOTHER TRUCK CAME BEHIND STOPPED VEHICLE WHICH WAS PARKED DUE TO FAILURE OF THE SAID VEHICLE DUE TO CLASH OF TRUCK 2 PERSONS DIED IN THE TRUCK WHO SITTED IN THE TRUCK HOW MUCH THE OWNER AND INSU COMPANY LIABLE FOR THE DEATH OF THE TWO PERSONS
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
everithing about caveat
kindly let me know about caveater/tee;there rites/limtations etc. how to vacate the caveat petition? also kind enough to submit case/s.