Navjot Singh Wahniwal
26 January 2010 at 09:50
Legal capacity of a mentally retarded person with 40% disability
Whether such person can give consent and enter into a contract?
Anonymous
25 January 2010 at 22:43
I am born & brought up in maharashtra. I have three daughters & no son. my first daughter married in gujrat, second and third in maharashtra. after marriage of all daughters can i continue huf ? with only wife as member ? or what will be position of huf and who will be coparcenor? if i continue huf what will happen after my death. i have good amount of investments in shares/govt.securities etc. pl. guide
anshul sangal
25 January 2010 at 20:35
I have recently passed out LL.B.Right now i am practicing in civil law.I want to know can practice in civil law will be helpful if in future i start practice in labour law or corporate law ?
vijeta
25 January 2010 at 20:31
what are benami transactions?
what are hawala transaction?
thanks.
Amandeep Singh
25 January 2010 at 20:20
Sir
I just want to know the execution process for a compromise deed entered among the parties in the district court.
We have entered a compromise to be performed within six months and lawyer is suggesting to apply for execution of the compromise in the court.Is there any time limit for applying for such execution and what is the procedure for the same?
email:amanrock21@gmail.com
Anonymous
25 January 2010 at 20:14
Please help me and inform if there is any provision in the CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURES as I am a senior citizen,79, and afflicted recently by cerebral heomarrage, and have filed a suit to evict a trespasser. The L&L is over but the licensee continues to occupy my premises. He has also assaulted me when I went to negotiate with the trespsser. I have also made a complaint with the police but they have not acted. My wife and I have no place to stay, we are now taken shelter with relatives.
Anonymous
25 January 2010 at 19:57
A MONEY LENDER WITHOUT HAVING A LICENSE FILED A CASE FOR DECREE.IN SESSION COURT THE OPPOSITE PARTY COUNSEL ARGUED THAT AS THE MONEY LENDER IS NOT HAVING THE LICENSE TO DO MONEY LENDING HE CANNOT RECOVER THE MONEY AND COUNSEL ALSO GAVE THE MONEY LENDERS ACT OF THAT STATE IN WHICH IT IS CLEARLY WRITTEN AND HAS ALSO GIVEN LATEST JUDGMENTS OF VARIOUS HIGH COURTS OF THE COUNTRY IN THIS REGARD.BUT THE JUDGE DIDN'T LOOK UPON IT AND GIVE THE JUDGMENT IN THE FAVOR OF MONEY LENDER BY SAYING THAT IT IS THE CASE OF CHEQUE BOUNCING SO HE CAN RECOVER IT.IS THE APPEAL IN HIGH COURT IS ONLY THE REMEDY AVAILABLE.ON WHAT BASIS JUDGES MAKES THE DECISIONS?????????
Anonymous
25 January 2010 at 13:17
Can any Execution Petition, is filed along with a petition under Section 5 or 14 of Limitation Act by a bonafide pursuer,"in case of after 12 years, from the date of decree" is maintainable or not. If so, can you refer me a Apex Court finding against this.
Thanking you.
siddharth
25 January 2010 at 12:05
Note:- after "brief description" in next para i have mentioned my current query regarding the same.
phone- 94255-35935, 98271-02807
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF OLD QUERY
sir actually matter is that my mother & father are practising in high court of chattisgarh, bilaspur.
one petitioner has given a case to my mother .initially he made affidavit in front of oath comissioner for his own WP (criminal ) matter.
as a result my mother filed an WP (criminal) and also a suit for declaration and injunction before the civil court against the respondents B.
Thereafter petitioner changed his attitude and denied that he has not given any power (vakalatanama) regarding the above said case & he also denies filing of any petition before the said court. When my mother appeared in the civil court , petitioner denied and engaged another counsel regarding he same . before the civil judge class iv ,matter was heard in absense of said petitioner and newly engaged counsel as a result,court dismissed the petition due to non appearance.
Now after few days petitioner of the above said case filed a complaint before JMFC, that we have taken money 2,50,000/- RS for the court fees and we have not filed the case suit,in addition to complaint it is pertinent to mention that petitioner told in their complain that they have drawn the amount by self cheque but in police complain they told about cash payement to us.
in police investigation it is mentioned that cheque is drawn as self cheque by
the petitioners itself.
but now JMFC has registered section 420,467,468-34 of IPC and summoned. sir now what to do prevent from warrant . is there any danger of arrest.which court to be approached
current query:- after court has summoned on 20th january 2010 and next hearing is on 24 february, can police trouble(arrest) us before 24th february 2010, and on day after tommorow i.e. 27th january we are filing revision in the court of DJ against above mentioned sections.
now question arises do we still have to appear on 24 february i.e..., next hearing.
Now what action we should take against the complainant petitioners i m very much worried.
sir please reply and question any imformation you require sir its urgent
my mothers & father phone number are
9425535935
9827102807
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Notarisation of documents
what are the significances of notarising a document?
1) By signing the document,does the notary guarantee the originality of the same?
2} what is the responsibility/liability on the notary in the process?
3} By the notarisation of a document,does the legal enforceability increases?
4) what are the permissible maximum charges for notarisation of documents?
a) Are notaries required to publicly display these rates?
b) If not displaying or violating these rates,to whom should be approached for remedies?
Whoever having time and patience need only answer these queries,as i do not expect a one word answer.
Some of the "experts" forget to remember while answering that these are being read by ordinary people too.