Bhartiya No. 1
10 February 2010 at 23:28
Respected Members/Experts,
Can any one post or make me available the Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court, where it is observed "
LAW OF ADVERSE POSSESSION NEEDS CHANGE.
Where A bench comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Harjit Singh Bedi,had observed this.
Thanks to everyone.
Gul Thadani
10 February 2010 at 22:49
Dear Mr Makkad thanks a lot.Please tell me as what should i tell the sectary of the society to do and if he refuses what should i tell him because they will tell me its leagaly caot be done as all of them are very elderly and i dont want to be in their bad books.How do i tackle them please help me as to what should i go and tell them.
Anonymous
10 February 2010 at 22:36
i have a credit card problem where huge rate of intrest late payment charges service charge service tax were charged ,any guidelines from rbi any favourable decisions to card holders
Anonymous
10 February 2010 at 22:24
i have a credit card from andhra bank with acredit limit of rs.15000 ihave a problem with bank that they are showing outstanding rs 50000 they charged me huge late payment charges service charge service tax etc..whether i have any option to challange the problem if yes where consumer forum can u provide me any guidelines r case laws favourble to card holders
Yaseen Mohammad
10 February 2010 at 15:57
Plaintiff filed suit for injunction against defendants. The father of plaintiff alienated the lands 30 years back and also deposed in one suit that he alienated the lands to others along with defendants. Now the case is the plaintiff filed the suit for injunction on the lands which were alienated by the father of plaintiff long back. Please give a judgment of supreme court or any high court regarding the witness deposed before judicial proceedings can be taken into consideration and it can be presumed.
Gul Thadani
10 February 2010 at 10:08
Dear Mr Makkad Thanks for your reply and help but i want to make sure.
Are you saying that there is no legal law in what society people are telling us which is all story cooked up they are just doing what they want or what my uncle would have told them to say.So is it that my society people are fooling us by telling us that they have done according to co-operative housing society law.
Please tell me how to proceed for the legal action.
Anonymous
09 February 2010 at 22:52
Sir,
Is it necessary to enclose the urban land under municipal limits with boundary wall? Is boundary wall a proof of possession? What if boundary wall removed by neighbor, in absence of the owner of the land some year back and owner did not reported anywhere?
Thanks.
Gul Thadani
09 February 2010 at 22:46
Mr Makkad thanks once again but if you can tell me exactly what i have to do and what is the procedure. Let me tell u frankly i dont want o give my uncle a single penny from this as he has been cheating the whole family from so long when we were very small.As we never Knew what was happening between them.So please help me as because of all this my mothers health is affected and we all sacred everyday what will happen.
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
09 February 2010 at 22:35
Dear Ld Friend,
I have found that in the District Court the
Additional Civil Judge Senior Division and the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate both in short write as ACJM while the meaning of ACJM fit for Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and not fit for Additional Civil Judge Senior Division.
In terms of powers both are different one have civil power and the other one is of criminal power. SO how can we sue one name ACJM for judge and magistrate.
What is the real mean of using one name for both the categories ?
Please check both the link of Allahabad High Court where it is used as ACJM I mentioned in my query.
http://allahabadhighcourt.in/District/district.htm
and
http://allahabadhighcourt.in/District/Saharanpur.htm
and
http://allahabadhighcourt.in/District/Muzaffarnagar.htm
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
ADVERSE POSSESSION
Respected Members/Experts,
Can any one post or make me available the Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court, where it is observed "
LAW OF ADVERSE POSSESSION NEEDS CHANGE.
Where A bench comprising Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Harjit Singh Bedi,had observed this.
Thanks to everyone.