sanjay sharma
22 March 2010 at 09:24
sir,
i am residing in dehradun in a bulding which is owned by four landlords, one of them is me residing at ground floor. Sir one manjeet singh is constructing illegal rooms at first floor making an opering of window towards my premisis and one room at second floor (tin shed). i reported the matter to mdda, dehradun but they did not stopped the construction they only issued a show cause notice to him asking him to show map etc. now i request what i can do in the matter
regards
sanjay sharma
Anonymous
22 March 2010 at 05:20
we are staying in maharashtra jalgaon district and we have huge property and but most of the property in possetion of old tainent and two or three have their own property, two are not paying rent just everybody is asking money please help me
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
21 March 2010 at 22:21
Dear Sir.
1. I am contesting a civil suit at Civil Judge [S.D] from last one 2 years. I draft the papers for my client and after that present to them read and tell them & after if agreed took the sign of my clients on each application or letter and after that deposit it before court of law.
But
The adverse party counsel move a single page letter or application without the sign of his Parties and makes his sign on application or letter only and filed it.
2. would the CPC provides exemption of not make a sign compulsory on each application of actual parties and engaging counsel is only sufficient to make his sign only and filed it before court.
Or
the actual parties also have to sign each application or letter with counsel to present before court.
3. It is wrong practice or right for not taking signs on each application in CPC and the counsel have liberty to file any paper by making his sign only on each court dates.
4. What provisions are in CPC that provides exemption of not taking signs of actual parties on application or letter and counsel have power to make his sign only on applications or letter?
Anonymous
21 March 2010 at 21:27
Dear Sir,
I am an accidental claim lawyer in Dmaoh civil court.
There is a Query that we have a series of Bus accidental case.there was 42 peoples injured.
The problem is that there is no MLC report of 20 people who had injured.
So is there any rulling or citation for no requirement of MLC in accidental claim cases.
IF THERE IS ANY CITATION OR RULLING PLEASE FORWARD DETAILS...
Regards:
Abhinesh M. Agrawal
M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka
21 March 2010 at 20:38
WHEN A REGISTERED GIFT CAN BE CANCELLED.IS THERE ANY LIMITATION
M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka
21 March 2010 at 20:34
WHEN A REGISTERED GIFT CAN BE CANCELLED.IS THERE ANY LIMITATION
M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka
21 March 2010 at 20:06
HI,parkaL. Dist .Warangal,AP.junior civil judge in direcly supporting one advocat saying,to me & ,posted the case,
to file counter IN IA and for hearing, though entire proceedings in the suit stayed by Hon'ble JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ,HYDERBAD,AP
CAN I LAUGH OR CRY.PLEASE SUGGEST !
vinod bansal
21 March 2010 at 13:21
R/Members
My client is doing business of grain trading in food grain mandi and he used to export grains like wheat/rice etc. to different -2 states and nepal,bangla desh etc.He used to hire trucks from throughout Haryana from transport companies but now in Jind city some notorious/crl type persons has started exploit and threat to my client by saying that they have organised a truck operator union in Jind and now he(my client)is bound to hire trucks only from there truck union on exorbitant rates,otherwise he would have to face dire consequences,my client on my advice made a representation before higher authorities in Jind with written complaint,but police and adm. officers instead of taking any legal action opined my client to avail/hire trucks from their so called Truck uniopn as they are paying "BEGAR" to officers as and when required.Yesterday membersi.e. infact criminals snatched documents from driver of a truck who was loading grain from the godown of my client and documents are in their possession till now,police is not taking any action against them reason best known to them.I want to know,whether such type of TRUCK Union is legal/authorised or not in Haryana as i had read a news at the time of taking oath as CM by Hon,ble Mr. Hooda in last term of his Chief Minister that he has dissolve every truck union in Haryana and now running of truck union in Haryana is illegal,i have gone through so many CWP decided by our Hon,ble Highcourt in cases of Punjab in which HC has pleased to passes an order to concerened police to take action against such type activities in the name and grab of truck unions and further to take appropriate step for smooth functioning of business as it is fundamental right.I want to know is there similar situation on legal point on this issue in Haryana,can i file a injuction suit before civil court for returning of documents. With Regards Vinod Bansal Advocate Jind Haryana
Anonymous
21 March 2010 at 12:57
I appointed a lawyer and filed suit in Mangalore in Jan, 2007. Lawyer did not attend Court and therefore I lost the case in October, 2007. Lawyer was surely bribed by the opposite party. Lawyer always kept saying that case is still running. I came to know that judgement and decree has been done only in April, 2009. i.e. after 17 months.
Law of Limitation for appeal in High Court is 60 days. I have appealed in High Court and have asked for a Condonation of Delay CD of 15 months specifying very clearly about the corruption of my lawyer. I have prayed that the suit should be sent back to the Mangalore Civil court, so that I can get justice. The suit in Bangalore High Court is currently pending for admission.
If I win this appeal and my prayer is granted, I have no problems. I will be able to fight my case again in lower court with a different lawyer.
But, if I lose this appeal due to law of limitation for appeal, I want to file a case in the Bar Council of Karnataka in Bangalore against my lawyer.
In this case, what is the start date for counting the Law of Limitation of two years to file a case against lawyer for deficiency of Service? Is it the day I came to know in April, 2009 Or the date of the judgement of this Condonation of Delay filed in the High Court?
I do not want to file complaint in Bar Council right now since I am in Mangalore and Bar Council is in Bangalore and I do not want to fight two cases simultaneously.
Thanking all in advance for your esteemed answers.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Development of Trust Property and Partition Suit
X created a trust with respect to one of the properties he owned and the beneficiaries named therein were his grandsons namely A and B (sons of Y). X & Y were the trustees. As the income of the trust property was not sufficient and the trust was earning a loss, X filed an application u/s 36 of the Trust Act and obtained the necessary permission to develop the said property to prevent loss and injury to the estate. However before the property could be developed X expired.
The trust deed mentioned that on the expiry of A & B and in the absence of lineal descendants of A and B the property would vest in favour of C&D (sons of Z, another son of X.) or their lineal descendants.
Z, C & D filed a partition suit claiming half share with respect to the said property. The court granted an order of status quo.
In order to minimise the loss of the estate and to fulfill the desire of the settlor to develop the property, Y alongwith his co-trustee intends to get the property developed for the interest of A & B.
Under these circumstances:
1. Can the court stop the development of the said property?
2. Does Z, C or D has any valid claim at this stage?
3. What are the remedies available to Y or A and B so that the property could be developed so as to minimise loss of the estate and benefit of A & B which was the intention of the trust?