Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 17:34
sir,
i am residing in a residential premises and in the same building three illegal coaching institutes are running causing unidentified persons visit in entrance dead end lane purely meant for the residents,relatives,friends of two buildings. i want to stop unidentified visitors causing nuisance. pl guide what i should do and tell me how or where to report of the above illegal coaching institute running in residential area of Dehradun.
vinod kumar
09 March 2010 at 13:56
someone has a residential accomodation which falls under delhi rent control act as the rent is below Rs 3500. now the lndlord says that the maintenance chrges paid to the society can be included in the rent and hence the rent + society charges ( though paid by the tenant) exceed the abovesaid amount.the landlord has threatened with legal notice demanding eviction since now the house does not remain under rent control anymore. Has the HC actually ruled like this and has the SC upheld this
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 12:41
I would like to know if I can approach the consumer court for redressal if the heirs of the owner of a property bought by me refuse to sign the sale deed even though the payment is done in full and the same is acknowledged by the owner's power of attorney holder who was the developer at the time when the owner was alive. The owners had entrusted the developer with the job to collect the amount through a power of attorney made by them in favour of the developer. The heirs have come into the picture after the death of the owner and the delay for making the sale deed earlier was due to indecision on the part of the owners to form a society. The heirs are today claiming additional amount over and above the agreed amount paid by me and they say that they want the money for signing the sale deed and they will not be issuing any receipt or acknowledgment for the same. I was also given to understand that I could get the sale deed registered even if one of the parties (usually the seller) does not cooperate. Pl. advice under which sections in the registration act is this possible and also on what grounds or clauses can I approach the consumer court. Advise urgently. Thank you.
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 09:56
Hello,
As you know, My wife has filed 24 HMA against me. The order has been against me(copy attached as attachment).
I am going to file an appeal petition before the Hon’ble High court of Delhi in 24 HMA, for the judgment against me.
Please can you provide me some sort of citations/ judgments of Hon’ble High court/Supreme court, in favour of me so that I can have to pay a minimum amount.
bhanu pratap720
09 March 2010 at 08:50
considering the doctrine of comparative hardship and sec 21 of u.p.rent control act are there any recent case laws which would favour the tenant ?
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 03:02
Dear SIR/MADAM,
I need your expert advise regarding my marriage through ARYA SAMAJ MANDIR.
I am 27 yr old , christian male and an engineer by profession.
I am in love with my real uncle's daughter (my fathers real brother).
She is 25. She is also working in same town.
Our parents would definitely not allow our marriage since we have good reputayion in our village.
Hence I wish to know that whether we can get married through ARYA SAMAJ MANDIR?
What is the procedure and is it legal to do that way?
Kindly help as we can not live without each other.
Thanks and regards!
J SMITH
Md Shadab Ansari
09 March 2010 at 00:18
Is Conversation between Advocate & other party (not the Advocate) come under priviledge or professional communication as stated in Section 126 of Evidence Act?? Can this recorded conversation be adduced as evidence???As in that conversation the opponent party accepted the deeds done by him..Section 126 of Evidence Act prohibits the disclosure of any fact of his own client....Need suggestions and opinions....
Thanks
Anonymous
09 March 2010 at 00:03
Respected Experts
I wanted to purchase a piece of land, but exact area was unknown. Some confusion was there regarding area. So, 40 cent is written with exact/specific boundary. It also got mentioned in the recital portion of the sale deed that entire land of mine is being sold in this specific plot and if the land measures more than the written area, vendee will have the right title and possession of that excess area, neither me nor any of my heirs will have any objection. Vendor has specifically written in recital portion that now I have no land left in this plot, all has been sold and being transferred to vendee from today itself. Recently when I got it measured, it is around 51cent within the mentioned boundary. Stamp was payable as per the value of the land and there is no deficiency regarding stamp. So what to do in this situation? What is the importance of the recital portion of the sale deed? Also in this case will boundary prevail? Is there any case law related to this type of situation? Plz. Suggest. With thanks and regards.
Anonymous
08 March 2010 at 23:48
Sirs,
My in laws property were acquired for yje forming of house cites by the city improvement board in Mangalore by a equivalent 4(1) notification on 27/8/81.
and 6(1)in 1-10 -82
The final award was datde 14-5-87. Possesion was taken in 22-5-87.
The declared award was accepted with protest and an enhancement was sought for.
One of the contention is the sale deed relied on by the LAO in 1981 is not the right ones and alternate higher rates of sale deed of the same vicinity in the same period were presented.
Our other major contention is that as per section 11, the acuisition has lapsed
as the award is made after 2 years, as such the same is not legal.As such We are seeking the prevailing rates for the period when the land was taken possession in 1987.
Would our learned friends be able to recommend some judgements in support of our contention or able to give their learned opinion in this matter.
I look forward to your opinons.
With Best regards,
Prakash
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Receipt of Letter - its contents not Accepatable
Sir, if any listed company has received one letter and gives an acknowledgent only for the receipt of letter. What is procedure for an acknowledgement for the receipt of letter only (contents of letter has not being verified at the time of receipt of letter).
Further, if any of the contents is not accepatable to the company, what is procedure to be follow by the company and within what timeframe.
Sir, if possible, please tell me the relevent Section Number of the relevant act under which the same is required.
Thanks.