vasantha
23 April 2010 at 16:40
My grand father purchased agriculture land Tamilnadu in 1941. Grand father died on 1954. Govt Revenu records show my grand mother name but Registered document has my grand father name. He has 4 daughters and 2 sons. I am Son's daughter. All my aunts are married before 1989 and died except one. Survving aunty filed civil suit on us to get 1/6 in agriculture land. My aunts has right to claim on that property ? Tamil nadu HSA 1989 law says female marreid before 1989 does not have rights. But Centre goverment HSA act 2005 says female has birght rights on father property. Which Act prevail n Tamilnadu?
Please clarify
Gaurav
23 April 2010 at 16:07
Dear Experts,
My father died last month in Delhi in my home. We did his last rites (funeral)in my home town in Mathura.
We applied for his death certificate in Mathura, where Nagarpalika has objected on issuing death certifiacate citing reasons that since death has taken place in Delhi hence death certificate will be issued from Delhi only.
Can anyone guide me as from where I would get death certificate & what is the process in such suitations.
Thank you in advance.
regards,
Gaurav
Debashis Mandal
23 April 2010 at 13:09
Respected Experts
If all documents & required Papers r properly given then scarching of a property will take how long time ?
Thanks
Debashis
Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 12:28
IS IT POSSIBLE TO GIVE GPA TO MORE THEN ONE PEOPLE OR GIVEING GPA TO ONE PERSON AND OTHER POA ( SPECIFIC POWER OF ATTORNEY) TO ANOTHER , KINDLY CALARIFY!
Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 12:24
In civil court is it admissable by court if any statement is given to court through ,presenting affidavits through lawyers ,or is it compulsary to present before court, personally,in a family partition related matter.do, both the ways have equal weightage or not?
Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 11:43
I purchased 9.8 Cents of land in Athimarapatti Panchayat in Thoothukudi District, Tamilnadu in the year 1989 and constructed a house in 1989-90 at the eastern end of the plot with Government loan and with Plan and Plot approval from Town Panchayat. There was an open space of about 4.5 Cents left vacant between my house and a neighbour on the western side of my land.
I started construction of building from 22.08.2008 connecting the old building after due plan approval on 17.7.2008 from Athimarapatti Panchayat. My neighbour out of jealous and hatred sent a Lawyer Notice which was received by me on 27.12.2008, objecting my construction. The suit was filed against me (1), Athimarapatti Panchayat (2) and Member Secretary, Thoothukudi Local Planning Authority.(3) as Defendants. With the following points:
1. My construction stops air and light to his house.
2. The construction is dangerous for his family due to possible fall of construction materials into his plot.
3. Only 2’3” space is left vacant on western side of the new construction.
His prayers are:
“ i. To pass an order of mandatory injunction directing Panchayat and LPA authorities to remove construction.
ii. To pass a permanent injunction restraining from putting up any construction on the property in such a manner that it causes nuisance to the plaintiff by falling of cement, plaster, bricks and sand in the plaintiff’s property. “
My lawyer sent a reply stating that
a. The construction is done within defendant’s own premises and there is no encroachment.
b. There is no nuisance to the plaintiff.
c. Construction is done after the approval from Panchayat
d. The case is raised by the plaintiff due to jealousy and hatred.
e. The construction was started well before the date specified by the plaintiff.
f. The plaintiff has not got approval for his additions from Local Planning Authority
g. The plaintiff has constructed and raised the common wall in between them without defendant’s agreement illegally.
h. The defendant has completed the construction without causing any nuisance to his neighbour. Whereas the plaintiff caused a lot of troubles during the construction and the defendant had completed the house bearing all the troubles and disturbances from the plaintiff.
i. The intention of the plaintiff is to stop the construction at any cost.
Court has not issued any injunction as the building is within the owner’s premises.
One inspector from Local Planning Authority inspected the site on 9.1.2009 and found the construction was almost complete and hence they would issue formal notice to stop the work and to produce approved drawing to their office, He also observed that the neighbour had constructed additional height on the common wall for his car shed, that is the construction is without any gap on his side for almost half of the length of the common wall to a height of about 12 feet He also opined that I should have filed a suit on the neighbour. The inspector also stated orally that the intention of the rules are that one has to leave space around his house for ventilation and light for himself, One cannot expect that the next plot owner would leave space for his house ventilation and light.
From LPA I received a notice on 2.2.2009 to submit the approved drawing and to stop the construction. I appeared before LPA submitted a copy of the Panchayat approved drawing and confirmed in writing that the construction was complete.
Subsequently construction completion was conveyed to the Panchayat Office. They assessed for tax and the tax and development fees were paid to the Panchayat and they had issued Property Tax Receipts. With the receipts I applied for electrical connection and got.
Now the lawyer I have engaged is not experienced in building construction related disputes. But he is sincere and straight forward. I want to get the experts opinion on this case on the following issues:
1. Whether my new construction is illegal?
2. Is it correct on the part of my neighbour to say that my construction stopped light and air to his house when he himself had left no space and constructed to half the length of the common wall without my agreement.? (Unfortunately no agreement deed was made on common wall built earlier)
We both (Plaintiff and defendant) served in the same Central Govt, Department. (I was a Senior Scientific Officer and the neighbour was a Scientific Assistant) and retired. It was clear that he had filed the suit out of jealousy and hatred only. He had told his close friend that he would go unto Supreme Court and is ready to spend any amount. He uses all the abusive words when seen face to face. These things upset me and I lost peace of mind and got sick. During construction period he created more troubles which delayed the work and increased the cost of construction. And under such circumstances:
3. What is your advice to me to follow?
4. Since I have never faced this kind of humiliation is it possible to file a Defamation Suit against my neighbour?
Kindly advice.
Debashis Mandal
23 April 2010 at 00:23
Respected Experts,
For Scarching of any Property How much time may be needed?
Thanks
Debashis
P.C. Joshi
22 April 2010 at 23:16
friends,
i have to draft an agrement for my co. under which the company wants to appoint an super stockist who will buy substantial qty of goods and shall appoint further dealers at a price decided by the company. He will pay for goods to the company and will get commission of certain %. Can it be called an agency agreement or super stockist agreement or it is a simle sale purchase arrangements. What will be the sales tax implications.
can anyone provide me some clue where I can have a specimen format of this agreement.
regards
P.c. joshi
Anonymous
22 April 2010 at 22:24
sir, i have a query, i want to know whether a partition suit for agricultuiral land is admisable by civil courts or it is the matter of jurisdiction of revenue court......? if any civil court admits it for hearing can it get dismissed for the same reasons. kindly qoute concerned sections under which this provision is made under law. any case study or ruleing in this context.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
cheque bounce
I have purchased one site in Bangalore with the mutual agreement with site owner, the total cost of site is 700000 lacks and 600000 lacks paid in cash while register time and the remaining amount paying in later and I register the site. after registration . still he was not given position to me and he saying remaining amount paying immediately then only I will get the position. but now my financial condition is very bad because of my dad get admitted in the hospital for a heart surgery. his knowing my condition he presented cheque to bank without telling me and in the bank insufficient cash the cheque get bounce. so keeping this reason his telling me to re-register site to his name and he will pay the 600000 lack back to me otherwise he will going to file the case against me (keeping cheque bounce slip)and he saying he will take back the site without paying any amount to me, because his intention is to take back the site to his name. now the market value of that site is 1200000 lacks. so I request please advice on this anybody, thank you, deepu