Anonymous
22 June 2010 at 12:23
I have purchased sony lcd on 13 march 2009. the company give one year warranty. in warranty period in feb 2010 lcd was create some problem. i have file complain and company provide service . After this, warranty period expired on 12 march 2010, But same problem occured in june 2010.company says some part of lcd will be changed and ask me for payment of rs.10000. my opinion is if same problem arised after warranty period the foult been arosed in the warranty period the company is liable to replace such part on own cost. can i am right?
barun deka
22 June 2010 at 08:38
an order of temporary injunction has been passed in a civil suit. but subsequently certain alterations has been made in the subject-matter(land) in violation of the order. the person responsible for such alteration is not a party to the suit but is believed to be a acquaintance of the defendant (though no solid proof). can this person be made a party in the violation proceedings under Order 39 Rule 2A of CPC? Was the injunction order binding upon him?
Any similar case laws????
mahee
21 June 2010 at 22:52
As a owner passion holder is right as per TP act u/s 53A part performance. He was repair the door of shop ,in between by force another person came to the shop and interfering the repairing job, he show that he is owner of shop and passion holder is tenet. As a landlord he file fir u/s 294 ,324,506B. second he file civil case for eviction on the basis of nuance. Criminal case decide and passion holder take right of self defence .
Civil case pending , we want to challenge that one matter of dispute is decided by court in criminal case the same matter again could not produce by way of civil case and one matter can not repeat for proceeding as per law.
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 21:18
Dear Sir/Madam,
Is there any change in the earlier settlement rule laid down by RBI for loan taken from a co-op bank? Can I have the exact guidelines/rules for such settlement bet'n the bank and the client?
Regards.
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 21:03
Hello there,
My Friend's father has got 2 wives. His father, firstly married my friend's mother's elder sister. As they were not blessed with any baby initially, his father married my friends' mother. This way these 2 sisters are married to one man, i.e his father. This was happened in 1970s.
13 years back my friend's father and mother both have expired and his other mother (his mother's elder sister) is alive.
Can my friend approach court for getting his part of property that his father left.
Is he eligible for getting his father's property. His knowingly has written most of his properties on his both sons. i.e. my friend and his brother (son of the other mother).
Please help us. His living mother and brother both abused him and said they are not going to give him anything from his father's property.
Thanks in advance.
Gangaram.
pratik
21 June 2010 at 18:18
Meaning of Spes Successions Unnder the TPA (Transfer of property act, 1882) also the doctrine required. with the help of a example pls expalin. Explain me the doctrine of part performance with the help of a example.
Pls it a request to explain me the above one's.
Thanks a Lot.
pratik
21 June 2010 at 18:04
Meaning of Gratuitous act & non - Gratuitous act with the help of example(S)(S).
Abondonment of Contract & Remission of Contract.
Pls give the meaning of the abovementioned & the difference between them.With the help of a suitable examples.
Thank a Lot.
pratik
21 June 2010 at 18:02
22- Transfer to members of a class who attain a particular age.
Where, on a transfer of property, an interest therein is created in favour of such members only of a class as shall attain a particular age, such interest does not vest in any member of the class who has not attained that age.
13- Transfer for benefit of unborn person.
Where, on a transfer of property, an interest therein is created for the benefit of a person not in existence at the date of the transfer, subject to a prior interest created by the same transfer, the interest created for the benefit of such person shall not take effect, unless it extends to the whole of the remaining interest of the transferor in the property.
Query: As per Section 22 attain a particular age means (As per the Indian Majority Act where 18, or 22 should be considered for the interpretation of the section 22 of the transfer of poperty act, 1882.)
Pls explain the section 13 in detail with the help of a example(S)(S).
Thanks A Lot.
pratik
21 June 2010 at 14:24
Q. What is the difference between the follwing ?
A. Following are the terms used by lawyers and judges and police.
Setting aside- When a party gets aggrieved by any order of a lower court, a revision petition is filed to set aside that order.
Quashing- When a party is aggrieved by a judgment, an appeal is filed to quash the judgment.
Expunction -When a party is aggrieved by certain observations/findings and not necessarily the order/judgment, then the higher court is petitioned to expunge the portions objected.
Reconciliation -Forgive and forget. The difference is that in compromise there may be terms and conditions of settlement but in reconciliation no there are no terms and conditions.
Pls elaborate the abovementioned in more detail i would like to hae the learned members contribution in depth pls also would like to have the difference between quashing, compounding of offence & compounding, cognizance, to take the cognizance in depth. pls if possible witht the example.
Also Inside the Forum - Civil I have a written a para regarding the difference between law of resitution & law of compnestion pls read it & give comments on it in depth.
Thanking u all experts in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Partition deed
Hello All,
We are four brothers and we had some land which comes after my father possession and we also had some grandfather property.
I wrote a deed that i don't have further rights on the JOINT property at that time it was like we all assume that it is on father's property but now they are showing this document and said that i don't have any right on my grandfather's property.
So can you please tell me do i have any chance as i didn't mention what land, means survey number.
So can I file a case regarding this or what? Please help me sir.