Anonymous
05 January 2019 at 09:39
An practiting advocte's wife permission given to bank to put auction her property which loan taken against it and bank was put that assesset in aution after completion of the auction while handover to auctioneer the ld pleader put objection his wiese unsoundl mind she put signature and given permission to bank, hence it misuse of power and he is not vacate the house give advise in this point of view
Anonymous
03 January 2019 at 21:00
Our Society was formed in 1993 with 56 Members 7 stories with A.B and C Wings. Our Society Land is approximately 5500 sq.metres out of which approximately 1450 sq.meters is under Collector's Control. As per Govt. Directives the builder is supposed to surrender/allocate 6 One bedroom flats to Government Employees on subsidized rates whereby, the land under collector's control will be released to us. This has been 100% complied and the records are available at the registrar. We have been trying for Deemed Conveyance and started processing our papers in September 2017. Recently, when registrar was approached they informed us that we need to wait till 2019 Election as the Rules are going to change. My Main Query is since the builder has adhered to the Government Directives - WHY we have to wait till the 2019 Election and in what way we are concerned with the new rules that may come in force after election. We are supposed to follow the rules which are in force today. The Registrar has to fulfill his obligation and give us NOC as per written agreement to the builder which says that the Land Under Collector's control will be released to the Society after fulfilling the allocation of 6 flats to the Government Employees. All our papers viz. Agreements, Stamp Duty, Registration of Flats are in order. Grateful, please advise what should be our next approach in this matter.
Thanking you and with regards
Roland Noronha
Samudra
03 January 2019 at 17:00
Inam land was occupied by the Indian Army
Inam land was occupied by the Indian Army illegally and constructed buildings. On proving ( by submitting the documents) of our ownership they have entered into a lease agreement retrospectively. Now using a clause in Inam Act., "that a person can claim the ownership; if they are in position of the land on 1-11-1973"., Laying their ownership claim on this lease land.
Can an Indian Army claim this; as they are under lease and paying the lease amount on the above said date to the Inamdhar.
Thankingyou ALL, in advance expecting Quick solution Please.
PANKAJ
03 January 2019 at 14:58
Dear Sir / Madam,
kindly advice me i have purchased land last 10 years ago. i was purchase from two brother and his mother . After 10 years his sister sale her share same property to third party last month . same land sale without my knowledge without portion can sale as per Hindu act . Also his brother and mother sale all land so many people. but his sister ask to share only my property and he sell his share in my property . Can i suite a case his brother and mother as a forgery.
pls. advice me how can get police help.
Regards
Pankaj
Aditya
03 January 2019 at 14:31
Experts please may guide.. Where Gram sabha in Uttar Pradesh had any right to execute sale deed on barren land of gram sabha before year 1974 by any GO Or any Act.
Please go through my case pending in HC.. Your inputs may lead a correct way forward in my case.
1. Gata no 60 in gram fattepur, pargana - Hadha, tehseel and zila unnai was registered as banjar land with land category 5(3) in year 1972.
2. In 1973, gram Pradhan with concern of gram sabha members auctioned this gata to Habibur Rahman for setting up industry.
3. In 1973, gram Pradhan has done sale deed of same gata in favour of Habibur Rahman.
4. In year 1973, dakhil kharij was done by SDO by confirming the report of tehseeldaar.. And gata was ordered to be registered as abadi and in the name of Habibur Rahman in Khatauni.... While category of land has been changed to 6(2) without any order in Khatauni.
4. In 1974, Collector Unnao, given his approval to Habibur Rahman for setting up handloom / powerloom factory on same gata.
5. In year 1983, Habibur Rahman did sale deed in favour of Kamal Narayan Verma.
6. In year 1993, Kamal Narayan Verma filed title suit after reclaiming of land by gram Sabha at site.
7. In year 1996, Civil Court Unnao passed an ex party order in favour of Kamal Narayan Verma.. And declared Kamal Narayan Verma as Malik and Kabij of above mentioned gata. Further order decreed.
8. In year 2001, post death of Kamal Narayan Verma.. His sons did registered sale deed in favour of Meera Singh.
9. Till 2001 the said gata was in the possession of meera Singh.
10. In 2015, meera singh field entry correction case in SDO court.. For correction of 6(2) entry.
11. In March 18, meera singh has been made a party in one of the case of dhara 229, this case was filled by state government on the ziaur Rahman on whom name gata 43 was registered in same manner.....As gata 60 registered on the name of Habibur Rahman in year 1973.
12. In Nov 18, a writ was filed by LMC of fatepur against ziaur Rahman whose name was registered as bhumidhari as per the order of additional commissioner after passing an order against correction of entry of land category from 6(2).
13. HC accepted the writ and asked for report of SDM in this case.. SDM in her report confirmed that auction and sale deed was exacted in the case of Ziaurrahman.. Further SDM also narrated that in 1972 there was around 55 bigha land in fattepur village was registered as banjar.. In many such land sale deed was executed by gram sabha.
13. On 03.12.18, in the interim order of HC... Judge directed DM unnao to reclaim their property of Ziaurrahman ans also directed to reclaim the property where sale deed was executed by gram sabha in this 55 bigha banjar land.... As per HC.. Gram sabha does not have any right to execute sale deed in view of sec 117 of UP ZA LR Act.
Further case has been listed as a fresh on 03.01.19....
(Till 02.01.19 Meera singh could not become a party however an application has been moved for same and expected to be taken up on 03.01.19 listed date.)
14. In view of HC interim order.. SDM unnao has appointed lekhpal of gao and nagar palika shuklaganj EO as a receiver of gata 43 and gata 60.. Post correcting the dhara from 229 to 146 in 26.12.18.
15 On 27.12.18, property of meera singh (where a guest house was constructed) gata no 60 has been sealed by Tahseeldar as pee SDO direction... And possession of property was handed over to lekhpal and EO of Nagar palika Shuklaganj.
Anonymous
02 January 2019 at 22:32
Hi there,
We are very old tenants more than 55 years. The rented house is on my father's name. my father purchased land long time back and it has developed and builder gave us one flat against it. We have not yet registered the new flat.we have memories with the old house (rented) and don't want to vacate it. We now stay in a rented apartment.
If we register the new flats on my father's name will we have to vacate the old house?
Anonymous
30 December 2018 at 15:40
Sir,
I have an ancestral property of Grama natham (vacant site) in Tamil Nadu. From the year 1926 onwards we have the linked docs to prove the title. But the property is recorded as a vacant site in village revenue records. around the year 2005 few strangers have encroached the property by laying huts. I have approached the court filed suit for title and judgement was in my favour and evicted the encroachers.I am not in a position to build any hut or construction over there. hence I possess the Judgement and documents from 1926 I want to approach High Court to direct the tahsildar to issue patta for the same.
Kindly guide me the procedure and give me few direction precedences of this nature to obtain patta for vacant natham property based on title judgement, please.
chirag patel
30 December 2018 at 14:56
I had a credit card and since last 10 years I am not using it. I had something overdue when last I had used. Now in Dec 2018 local court summons came to my residence by the bank recovery person in which judge has summons me to appear before the court on say 07.12.2018. I with my advocate reached the court as per the timing mentioned in the summons but we were told that since judge was not there our new date of present in the court is 26.01.2019.
Suddently on 24.12.2018 same bank recovery agent and bank personal and alongwith the police approx. 5 to 6 people came to my house when I was not present at the house and one of them said that he is bailiff and he has warrant to seize my household articles. Surprising the warrant date was the same date when I appeared in the court i.e. 7.12.2018. Wife called me and I said I am coming and as soon as i reach the bank officials forcing me to come to settlement otherwise this court bailiff will take all the house furnitures fixtures etc.
Please also let me help whether law of limitation act applies in my case.
Looking to all this my wife got frightened and we have called our family and friends at my house.
Please advice me whether this procedure they had followed was as per law. Can a court issues warrant and give date on the same date of first appearence of the defendent.
It looks that something is fishy in the entire matter. How can I take up this matter to higher authorities.
thanks
Anonymous
30 December 2018 at 10:58
My Sister in law had taken chit fund for rs. 25 lacs at indirangar Chit fund in bangalore.. My husband and I and 2 of my relatives put surety..My SIL paid rs. 19 lac when she took prize amount after that she became defaulter... Now the chit fund people are threading us they are going to file a criminal case on me( as I am a public sector employee) and my husband along with the defaulter...
How can I get out it legally..whether this case will affect my carrier and my CBILE score?
If the chit fund company file the case against me, what will happen?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
RBA CERTIFICATE
What is need of family annual income in 2019 for preparing RBA CERTIFICATE??