Prateek
14 October 2010 at 00:45
Respectable Sir/ madam,
This query regarding Section 17. of the consumer protection Act. read with Section 2 of the same Act.
Sec. 17 defines the jurisdiction of the State Commission and Section 11 of the same act defines the jurisdiction of the District Commission as follows:
(2) A complaint shall be instituted in a District Forum within the local limits of whose jurisdiction, -
(a) The opposite party or each of the opposite parties, where there are more than one, at the time of the institution of the complaint, actually and voluntarily resides or 2[carries on business or has a branch office, or] personally works for gain; or
(b) Any of the opposite parties where there are more then one, at the time of the institution of the complaint, actually and voluntarily resides, or 2[carries on business or has a branch office], or personally works for gain, provided that in such case either the permission of the District Forum is given, or the opposite parties who do not reside, or 2[carry on business or have a branch office], or personally works for gain, as the case may be, acquiesce in such institution; or
(c) The cause of action, wholly or in part arises.
Section 2 sub part (aa) of the same act gives the definition of branch office as follows:
2[(aa) "Branch office" means -
(i) Any establishment described as a branch by the opposite party; or
(ii) Any establishment carrying on either the same or substantially the same activity as that carried on by the head office of the establishment;
I would like to ask that if a truck is insured by the lucknow branch of the Insurance Company and the truck meets with an accident in Himachal Pradesh but the truck was hypothecated in Dehradun and also the the amount for the insurance was paid at Dehradun, doesn't a part of the cause of action arise in Dehradun. I would also like to know that when Sec. 2(aa) has clearly defined the meaning of "Branch Office" then Sec 17. read with Sec. 2 would imply that the State Commission of Uttarakhand at Dehradun has the Territorial Jurisdiction to give its views in this case.
Waiting for your opinion.
Yours Sincerely,
Prateek Handa
Student,
Law College Dehradun
Mob: 9027277736
Dated: 14/10/2010
Anonymous
13 October 2010 at 19:43
Dear Sir,
I have taken admission in regular M.Tech ( CS ) in GCET Greater Noida on 4-12-2007 in academic year 2007-08. The event happened as follows
1.First examination schedule of first semester declared from 13-08-08, but canceled by university due to not completion of admit card process.
2.Second examination schedule of first semester declared from 26-08-08, and examination conducted properly.
3.Declaration of result just one day before first exam of first semester for batch 2008-09 in January 2009.
4.18 May 2009 had meeting regarding second semester examination's, and took schedule for the same from UPTU Lucknow for commencing 7 June 2009.
5.Declaration of Second semester result on 10 February 2010.
6.Putting scrutiny of all subjects on 12 and, 27 February 2010 for 2 Subjects each day as total i have 4 subjects.
7.Till date of 13 October 2010 university has not declared result of scrutiny.
I have consumed 34 months and from the date of admission 4th academic year in this course. Its duration is 24 months. I did not denied anywhere for any university or college activity. This all delay due to university irresponsible working and ignoring the student career. This is all when we have given many emails to university authorities but no reply and continuing same irresponsible working. My whole career and life is in great risk. I as not able to do regular jobs and still delay from university has put me in tremendous risk and tension.
I need suggestion from you what legal action i can took to save myself.
Regards.
Shah Trupti
12 October 2010 at 13:29
Dear Sir,
Can you please tell me in detail the procedure for removal of a director of Producer Company?
Regards
Trupti Shah
Anonymous
11 October 2010 at 13:00
What are the provisions regarding advertisement by an advocate. And what are the provisions regarding a web site launched by an advocate ? Which precautions regarding the words used in web site to be taken in launching web site ?
Anonymous
08 October 2010 at 08:24
I am doing my executive program and i want to know about the colourable legislation and the related case law in details please help me in this regard
subrahmanyam
05 October 2010 at 17:52
my name is subrahmanyam from andhra pradesh .In my tenth ,inter and degree certificates my name is printed as 'subrahmanam'. But in my date of birth , voter card, pan card and my father's ration card ,printed as 'subrahmanyam'.
how to correct my name as subrahmanyam
how to apply for govt jobs ?
what is the procedure for name correction through notary or affidavit.
RAHUL KUMAR TAANK
04 October 2010 at 11:51
DEAR EXPERTS,
WHAT IS THE LAST AGE FOR REGISTRATION IN LLB THROUGH REGULAR MODE.
IN WAITING YOUR REPLY
Anonymous
03 October 2010 at 14:59
Respected Sir / Madam,
I am Jaydeep A Tanna , Handicapped person, have applied for LMM admission Mumbai University on 7th Aug 2010
1)There were 300 student for admission with 6 group and 3% person reserved for handicapped as per the “Equal opportunity Right for Handicapped”Act 1995 enforce 2005
2)But I found there were 2 handicapped student on 1 list which declared by Mumbai university but my name was not in the list.16th Aug 2010 declare
3)I was shock to know, so I approach Surakha Madam who was incharge for the admission but not given me sufficient reply.
4)So I made online helpline Just Dial 02227777777 they provided me phone number of Ministry Dept 02222027990/ 02222026579/ 02222023093 so made approach to Ministry dept of Education (Date 20th Aug 2010 3pm)
5)So I approach Ministry of Education Dept of Mantralya but they gave me reply that university is autonomous body they are independent body to make their own rule but they gave me guideline of follow up in University.(Dated 20th Aug 2010 4.30 pm)
6)Thereafter went Mumbai University to Dr Mane ( Dept of law) Dr ozza ( Reader Dept of Law) (Register) Sir Venkatramni,Acting - L R Mane,(Vice Chancellor) - was not present.
7)Dr Mane reply me in 3% reserved Seat there are Quotta - NCC/ Widow / Sport person / Handicapped person but as per rule we are following but in act Sec - 33 clearly mentioned there should be 3% reservation for handicapped
•I explain that there can be only policy rules which could benefit handicapped
•handicapped are given reservation to make them able person so they can live with society.
•This Clearly show handicapped seat are manipulated(Dated 20th Aug 2010 5.30 pm)
8)So Finally I have no other option that go to Register Sir Venketramani(Acting) because now it can only help me so told him the entire queries he too was shock too & made phone call Dr Mane to look to my case & do all the need full. ( Dated 20th Aug 2010 6pm)
9)Prospectus for Admission of LLM does not even provide about Reservation percentage of Handicapped admission, prospectus which cost is Rs 250/- as given in Rules of Admission for 0.5241 is unsufficent 2010-2011.
But in Prospectus for admission of LLM 2009-2010 clearly Specified 3% of Reservation seat for Handicapped.
I request Department of Education to see the matter it required to get justice to the required person.
There will be 2nd list on 25th Aug 2010 those who have applied again.
Handicapped Seat are manipulated by mumbai university.
Thanks & Regards
Jaydeep A Tanna (LLB) (9029542163)
I had persue my admission for LLM for 2010 - 2011 but want to proced further so that future Disable right are not infrigment.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
history of court
sir.
i m student of B.A.LL.B 3rd sem i have a "history of court" .
my problame is fedral court .what is this.plz give me a brief ans.