saju sathyadevan
09 December 2010 at 13:14
My client has two proprietorship firm namely M/s STL and M/s STI. In STL he himself is the proprietor whereas in STI his son is proprietor. My question is that TDS u/s 194C on Labour Charges is deducted by STL in F.Y. 2009-10 is to be deposited in Govt. A/c. But while filling the challan form instead of STL it was wrongly written as STI and thus the TDS was deposited by STI. After revealing the mistake STL deposited the TDS amount. Now how could M/s STI get back the TDS amount of F.Y. 2009-10.
baswanth mohan paruchuri
08 December 2010 at 12:56
Hi This is parucchuri baswanth mohan, final year student of l.l.m, i am doing dissertation on rehabilitation of sick industries, so anybody having any information relating to it like articles, cases,expert opinions and any sort of like information please post it on this website in answer query.
Prem Jumani
08 December 2010 at 12:02
Dear Sir,
My Grand parent is known by two names one is official and other is unofficial the problem arised now is the in the Bank accounts the name that is appearing is unofficial name & the manager is claming to prove the same by way of an affidavit.
I would really appriciate if any one can send me an affidavit format stating that the person was named by two names.
Anonymous
07 December 2010 at 06:10
I have just completed my LLB and want to prepare for judiciary. Please guide me for the whole procedure. Thanks
AISH
06 December 2010 at 23:57
Dear sir,
I am astudent of class XI and will be moving to class XII in a few months. I would be giving CLAT 2012 and my wish is to enter in one of the top 5 national law universities.which books should i refer to now? is coaching useful in class XII- correspondence course or classroom coaching?
VIJAY UPADHYAY
06 December 2010 at 22:50
I HAVE COMPLETED LL.B.SPECIAL IN 2006. I M WORKING AS ACCOUNTANT IN A LTD COMPANY SINCE THEN. I WANT TO START LAWYER-PRACTICE AND WANT TO WORK AS TAX CONSULTANT. WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE TO BECOME AN OFFICIAL LAWYER NOW. WHAT IS THAT EXAM - NEWSPAPERS ARE TALKING ABUT? PLEASE GUIDE.
Anonymous
06 December 2010 at 18:13
SIR I AM PURSING MY LAW COURSE IN OPEN UNIVERSITY CAN I APPER BEFORTHE HIGHCOURT OR SUPREME COURT OR ANY OTHER CORT OF LAW
KINDLY CONCUR MY ANXITY
farrukh
06 December 2010 at 16:01
plz discuss specific performances of part of the contract provided in sections 14,15,16 of the specific relief act 1877 ?
ARUN KUMAR
06 December 2010 at 08:36
Dear Professional Friends,
Kindly explain me about summary suit in brief.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
constitutional law
it is a moot court problem on article 370 of constitution. the problem is like this:
the stat of J&K accedes to indian union & its relations with the union were supposed to be regulated by article 37o of the indian constitution. Article 370 provided that if any other part of the constitution of india has to be extended to the state if J&K it has to be done by the President of India by a Presidential order with the concurrence of the state; & the state defined within Article 370 is government of J&K acting on behest of Constituent Assembly of the state. the constituent assembly of the state was dissolved in 1957 and was substituted by state legislative assembly. despite dissolution of the constituent assembly various provisions of indian constitution continued to be extended to the state of J&K.
the petitioner, MR A, challenges the validity of these extensions on the ground that the state assembly while giving concurrence to the extensions acted beyond its jurisdiction as the state legislative assembly is not and cannot be a substitute for constituent assembly. So, the petitioner wants that the court should quash all the extensions made after the dissolution of the J&K constituent assembly.