LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

anil saxena   30 September 2013 at 18:01

Rti

discuss the case Dr D.B.Roy vs Legal officer

hithen   30 September 2013 at 16:50

Mediclaim

Dear All,
I have taken an mediclaim policy with reputed health insurance company for my mother age 69 year in month of December 2012 for Rs 2Lakhs.
At the time of issuance she had hypertension and joint pain,which i had inform the company.
she was under medical treatment under an cardiologist when the policy was issued.

In month of July she had an slight heart pain and the cardiologist advice for 2D ECo and later angiography,there after she was advice for bypass.
I had to go for surgery, the total cost was approx 5.5Lakhs.
I requested the company for claim.but company has rejected the claim saying that pre existence disease.
Kindly request for your advice.

Thanking You,

Hithen Ghharat

anil saxena   30 September 2013 at 16:47

Rti

मैंने एस .डी .महोदय से सूचना के अधिकार के अंतर्गत पूछा था "तहसील परिसर के सामने स्थित जन सेवा केंद्र जिसके संचालक प्रवीन भाटी है के दुआर क़ी जा रही अनीयमित्ताओ के सम्बन्ध में प्रार्थना प्रत्र दिया था प्रार्थी को अवगत कराये क़ी प्रार्थी के शिकायत पत्र दिनांकित २-९-१३ पर क्या कार्यवाही क़ी गयी है
इस प्रश्न का मुझे ये जबाब मिला है ," आपको अवगत कराना है क़ि आपने अपने प्रश्न में query क़ी है जिसका उत्तर सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम क़ी परिधि में नहीं आते है, उक्त के अतिरिक्त डॉ डी .बी. रॉय बनाम लीगल अफसर के वाद में निम्न मंतव्य दिया गया है "RTI not to answer Queries .....It is not to an appellant to ask,in the guise of seeking information ,question to the public authorities about the nature and quality of their actions .The RTI act does not cast on public authority any obligation to answer queries,as in the case ,in which a petitioner attempts to elicit answers to his questions with prefixes,such as,why,what,when and whether.

क्या मुझे इस जबाब को मान लेना चाहिए या सलाह दे क़ी मैं क्या कर सकता हूँ

anil saxena   30 September 2013 at 16:32

Right to information

मैंने एस .डी .महोदय से सूचना के अधिकार के अंतर्गत पूछा था "सरकारी नियम व शासनादेश के अनुसार जन-सेवा केंद्र जो आय ,जाति और मूल निवास प्रमाण -पत्र बनाते है ,तहसील परिसर से कितनी दूरी पर स्थापित होने चाहिए ? क्या जन सेवा केंद्र तहसील परिसर के अति निकट स्थापित किये जा सकते है ?"...............................
इस प्रश्न का मुझे ये जबाब मिला है ," आपको अवगत कराना है क़ि आपने अपने प्रश्न में query क़ी है जिसका उत्तर सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम क़ी परिधि में नहीं आते है, उक्त के अतिरिक्त डॉ डी .बी. रॉय बनाम लीगल अफसर के वाद में निम्न मंतव्य दिया गया है "RTI not to answer Queries .....It is not to an appellant to ask,in the guise of seeking information ,question to the public authorities about the nature and quality of their actions .The RTI act does not cast on public authority any obligation to answer queries,as in the case ,in which a petitioner attempts to elicit answers to his questions with prefixes,such as,why,what,when and whether.

क्या मुझे इस जबाब को मान लेना चाहिए या सलाह दे क़ी मैं क्या कर सकता हूँ

Salman   30 September 2013 at 16:13

Renewal insuracne company

I worked as Insurance Advisor since 2005 and worked more than 5 years. Now i am not active but my license is active for few more months.

I get my renewal commissions as I completed 5 years. My question:

-Will I continue get my renewal commission if I do not renew my license Or I cancel my insurance license?

Seeking expert's opinion here.

Suresh Kumar H   30 September 2013 at 14:54

Clarification on hindu succession act, 2005

I request you to clarify the following queries reg. the property of Father (Ancestral). Considering there is no written will:
(1) If there is 2 daughters and 1 son. what is the ratio of sharing (2:1:1) or (1:1:1)?
(2) If one of the above said daughter is dead, will her son and daughter has the right to claim? if so in which proportion?

Srinivas Jerripothula   30 September 2013 at 12:50

Child adoption

Hi All,

I am srinivas J doing practice. Sir, i am junior advocate doing practice for the past 4 years. One of my client has asked one query regarding the contesting in elections.

He has three childern's who was born after 1994. Under Section 19 (3) of APPR Act 1994, he is not eligible to contest in elections.

His brother does not have childern's so, his brother want to adopt one of my client childern.

After doing legal adoption process, whether my client is eligible to contest in general elections, showing that he has only two childern's. Although he has three childern's but has given one of his childern for adoption to his brother.

I request everyone to give a good suggestion.

Thanks & Regards,
J. Srinivas
Advocate
Hyderabad

shyam lal sharma   30 September 2013 at 11:23

Enrolment

Good Morning Learned Advocates

As myself enrolled as an Advocate in the State of Karnataka and now I got an opportunity to practice in Pune, Maharashtra, Should I re-enrolled myself as an Advocate in state of Maharashtra? Or do I need to fulfil any rule with this regard.

Sarath   29 September 2013 at 21:42

Call datas from a network

Dear seniors, how to get a 3 month call data records from a mobile network corporation?

Surrender K Singal   28 September 2013 at 13:13

Teh bazari by municipalality

What is Teh BAZARI ? HOW DOES MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS DERIVE ANY SUCH RIGHT TO LEASE OUT PUBLIC PLACES / LANDS TO ROAD SIDE HAWKERS / KIOSKS / POLLUTING DHABAS ?