vaishali
25 March 2011 at 00:54
I am a teaching faculty in an autonomous institutuion under governement of karnataka.I joined this institution as assistant professor against a vacant post based on the previous experience in private dental college recognised by dental council of India (DCI)in 2008. The minimum required qualification was minimum of 3 years teaching experience in a DCI recognised institution after postgraduation. I had 6 years of experience at the time of recruitment. recruitment had not taken place in the institution for a long time.In the same dapartment there is a assistant professorwho had assistant professor in 2007 by promotion from a junior post. Her total number of years of teaching experience is lesser than that of mine by 6 months.and I had served in the same cadre post in private institution since 2005.who will be senoir among us? DCI recognises my previous experience.even t he university recognises my previous experience. hower though I have been recruited to the post based on my previous experience, they say my teaching experience as of now is only 2 years and8 monthe. there are 3 tier system in the department senior lecturer, assistant professor, professor.
Arati Gawde
24 March 2011 at 22:22
What is the criteria / things require for establishment of Petrol pump?
gopal dutt vyas
24 March 2011 at 17:08
please let me know if any day is designated as law day
Anonymous
24 March 2011 at 14:18
Hello
I travelled with my wife to destination A , their was one stopover , but due to delay we had to take 2 stopovers , but while boarding at the 2nd stopover we were assured that our luggage will be travelling with us to the destination A,but it wasn't to be ,We got our luggage after 1 day , and that too it was broken from the retract handle ,so we had to carry the 23 kg bag it all our trip.
Now , even though we reported the damage at the time of receiving it in destination A ,after coming back ,I want to file for the following claims with the airlines,
1)Loss due to delay of luggage
2)Claim for Inconvenience of carrying the luggage all along our trip
3)Claim for damage to bag
4)Claim for international calls that we had to do for getting our luggage.
pls give me some case laws.
Bhavana Deshpande
24 March 2011 at 12:42
what are the challenges posed to the independence of judiciary.
Manoj kumar sahu
23 March 2011 at 23:00
Hello friends and seniors,
i just wanted to know if a lawyer got registered in Bar coucil of a state i.e Punjab and want to pratice in Delhi or Mumbai high court does he need to register again in the respective Bar council for practiving in the respective bar council. or is it like once got registerd in a Bar Council so he can practice in any Bar within the territory on India, friends please do let me know the the procedure for the same..
Thanks and Regards
Manoj kumar sahu
Anonymous
23 March 2011 at 19:31
I WANT TO KNOW THAT RTI IS APPLICABLE ON PRIVATE INSTITUTES AND SCHOOLS PLZ ANSWERE AND CITATION IF SOMEBODY HAVE.
Rajesh Tandon
23 March 2011 at 16:59
1. What is the legal remedy, if you approach a lawyer and submit your case with full trust on him, but he ultimately sits on your case file and doesn't even filed the case? Ultimately, whenever you approach him, he says that he was busy and he would very shortly do the same. It happened with me in one of the case of YO BYKE when repeatedly when I approached the lawyer, he would very nicely and politely speak to me with this excuse till the time I could with great difficulty withdraw the case from him and submitted to another lawyer. This ultimately delayed filing of my case by couple of months. Similarly, the other lawyer also started delaying the case till I influenced him to a local friend of mine. In yet another case of verification of land papers, another lawyer sat over my case for good about four months and similar polite replies were given til he finally did my job. Despite having received the payment in advance. Ideally the rele verification of land papers should not take such so much time
Anonymous
23 March 2011 at 15:45
Dear Sir,
As must be knowing i had query and you cleared my some of the doubts. Coming to the one more, case fact.
My mother who retired has filed case in Karntaka Tribunal Administrative (KAT) in the year 2006, and the advocate has given the case number 5879/2006 but still she has not got any updates about that case. I just tried KAT Website to check the status of case, but not able to find it. What would be the next proceedure please do clarifiy and clear the doubts.
With Regards
Vithal N Upari
IInd Sem LLB Student
M-9342385628
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Acts
THE AUTHORISED TRANSLATIONS (CENTRAL LAWS) ACT, 1973
NO.50 OF 1973
5th December, 1973]
An Act to provide for authorised translations of Central laws in certain languages.
Contents
1.Short title and Commencement
2.Authorised translations of Central laws in certain languages
3.Power to make rules
BE it enacted by Parliament in the Twenty - fourth Year of the Republic of India as follows:-
1.Short title and Commencement.- (1) This Act may be called the Authorised Translations (Central Laws) Act, 1973.
(2)It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.
2.Authorised translations of Central laws in certain languages.- A translation in any language (other than Hindi) specified in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution, published under the authority the President in the Official Gazette,-
(a)of any Central Act or of any Ordinance promulgated by the President, or
(b)of any order, rule, regulation or bye-law issued under the Constitution or under any Central Act,
shall be deemed to be the authorised translation thereof in such language.
3.Power to make rules.- (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Act.
(2)Every rule made under this section shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule.