Anonymous
01 February 2012 at 21:49
should insurers compensate losses from riots? which act cover this under which section
Anonymous
01 February 2012 at 21:04
I had a personal savings and company's current account in one nationalised bank. I had a dispute with the party from whom I purchased the business. He had an access to my personal cheque on which he put a company's seal (stamp) & presented to the bank. Obviously, a savings account cheque having a company stamp, bank should have rejected it. But as usual, lethargic staff bounced it with the remark 'insufficient funds'. The party sued me under N.I.Act 138.
It happened in 2000. I had to fight the case and got it dismissed. Simultaneously, I had filed case against him under IPC 467, 467, 471 420 etc.which is in process.
My question is whether I can sue bank for the damages & mental torture I faced due to the negligence on their part after lapse of almost 12 years?
Thanks & Regards.
Devajyoti Barman
01 February 2012 at 19:35
After a repeated and unanimous decision amongst us I would request all the Ld. Expert Friends here to follow the guidelines suggested by Mr Ramachandran.
Since I harbour exactly the same opinion as Mr Ramachandran., I reproduce his guidelines as follows.
"1. Do not answer “Anonymous” queries. (Answering ‘anonymous’ queries, or saying that we should help the needy etc., are all misplaced sympathies. If somebody is really in need, he will definitely abide.). Even if there is any attempt by interested quarters to boost the ‘hits’ by prompting ‘anonymous’ queries that will get discouraged.
2. Do not answer “Commercial” queries.
3. Do not answer “Academic” queries.
4. Do not answer “vague” queries.
5. Do not answer a query which lacks in facts.
6. Do not answer abstract queries.
7. Do not answer queries based on someone’s lofty ideas/views and the existing legal position.
8. Do not touch those queries which begins with Hi, guys etc.
9. Do not also touch those queries which is in ‘sms language’.
10. Do not attend to ‘moot problems’.
11. Ignore the ‘repeat queries’ if any.
12. Ignore the query, if the querist do not stick to the same ‘thread’.
13. Do not proceed to answer a query, when an expert had already sought additional information, and if the information has not been provided by the querist.
14. Do not touch a query, if you do not have anything to say as an answer to the same. Somebody who knows will give the answer.
15. Do not answer a query, unless you have anything further to add (value addition) or if you materially differ (you have a different view point) with the answer provided by an expert.
16. Above all, visit the profile of the querist, check what types of questions that he is posting. This will give us a rough idea about the genuineness of the query or he is a ‘busy body’, simply out there to raise one query or the other to keep the experts engaged!
17. Openly condemn those who solicit business by saying “contact me etc. etc.”
Please take UNITED STAND AND SHUN ' ANONYMOUS, COMMERCIAL AND REPEATED PROFESSIONAL QUERIES.
S.Narayan
01 February 2012 at 16:42
writ petition in original side admitted in Bombay high court in 2007.
the matter did not come up for hearing.
Notice of motion for speedy hearing of the case was filed in September 2011 as the petitioner was a senior citizen under distress.
The matter was to come up for hearing in the 1st week of October 2011, but has not been listed until date.
What is the further remedy available to the concerned petitioner for expediting the case. Please guide
Anonymous
01 February 2012 at 13:55
When there is a trust and in which procedure of upcoming trusty is by Sucession.and after death of father ( who is trustee ) he is having wife and three son behind him,who became trustee or whether all four sucessior became trustee. pls explain if any case law then pls refer it.
V R SHROFF
01 February 2012 at 08:53
A Query "Good Bye" asked today 1-2-12 by Shri Arunagiri.
Is attitude of LCI justified?
Should all important Experts Unite and solve our Problem together or not?
Should Arunagiri be scarified from LCI? , who fought for all of us Experts.
I appeal, all First 50 Experts to Reply the Query "Good Bye" of Shri Arunagiri today itself.
Let it's name Today, and not tomorrow.
Shall I pronounce "Expert's Union Zindabad"
Advocate. Arunagiri
01 February 2012 at 07:03
Dear Learned Experts,
I would like to recollect my previous discussions regarding the quality of the query in LCI.
We have decided to represent this LCI Admn as a team. I was asked to discuss with this Admn. So, I have sent an email to Mr.Prakash Yedulla Admn, LCI, few days before. For which there is no response. I was under the impression the LCI will be thankful to the experts for spending their time in answering queries. I was under the impression that the LCI will threat the experts as indispensable. I was under the expectation that LCI Admn will call me for a discussion. It is very much shocking to note “ no response”
Many of the experts are spending their time on this LCI. More than 90% of the queries are academic queries. That too like what is cr.p.c.? What is c.p.c.? By this it is very clear, the experts are spending their time in solving the academic queries.
Even out of the 10% queries, many of the queries are fake queries.
The admn is not understanding the fact, why the real grievances are not addressed in LCI?
The admn is interested in making money through advertisements and subscriptions. I don’t say that the LCI should do a free service.
LCI is getting its name, just because the experts are answering to the queries. This has increased the hits and they are getting advertisements. LCI should thankful to the experts for volunteering their services at free of cost. But, the LCI had started collecting subscriptions from the experts. It seems that LCI is of the feeling that experts are getting monetary benefits through publicity by paying subscriptions or otherwise.
Under the circumstances, I thought of informing the admn regarding the quality of the queries. If the quality of the query is not there, even then the hits are increasing, this is only an artificial booming, which is not healthy in the long run.
As long as the real aggrieved persons are not coming to LCI, the volunteers will be wasting their time, in solving academic and fake queries.
At this point, I personally thought of reconsidering my decision in continuing with LCI. Either I should continue as an inactive member or to leave the LCI.
I have decided to leave.
Unlike LCI Admn, before leaving, I wanted to thank my learned friends for having a nice interaction and friendly relationship, even though we have not personally met. I also thank LCI admn for giving me the opportunity to serve the public, who got benefited by my opinion.
The world is very small, hope I will meet the LCI team friends in a different platform or in person in any court.
I will be deleting my profile from this LCI as of 7.00 p.m. 01.02.2012.
Good bye.
V.Arunagiri. B.Com., B,L., SMP (IIM-Calcutta), (C.S)
Advocate and Vice Chairman, International Human Rights Association.
Mobile: 8807708423, 8807708424.
Email: advocatearunagiri@gmail.com
Ram Sowrya
31 January 2012 at 23:04
Dear Expert Members, Facts: I & my friend hail from Andhra Pradesh. V R 498a Victims, SIFF Members and RTI Activists. Today afternoon(4.00 pm) i got a call from some stranger named singh that he is investigating officer confirming about my details and asked to speak to his advocate Renuka Chaudhary. In his conversation he said "there was a case filed against me for a fraud of Rs 45000/- in Tizari Courts @ Delhi and wanted to me to appear tomorrow(01-02-2012) in Delhi And the same thing happend with my friend on 02-01-2012 from different number and the call story is same. Suprisingly both of our names were not there in the cause list of that said court Question: 1) Is it true to happen or any one is playing with us. 2) How a case can be registered without giving hearing notice to the other parrty 3) Without receving summons from the Court how one can appear. 4) Can the court(through their PP's)ask any one to appear without summons( calling over phone ) in short time Any advice to face such calls or situations
Anonymous
31 January 2012 at 20:42
In our colony, there are 21 buildings each have CHS. There is also federation of all these CHS. We are going for Redevelopment. 70% members signed the consent letter. Our agreement may be finalize by may.and redevelopment will complete 3 years. My query is What are the legal processes till 3rd party agreement? and will it complete before March2012 ?
Developer offer 11 lakhs to vacant present rooms so He can start his construction work .
Then if some of our members and comitee members opt for that offer then how we will operate our society? How to dissolve society ?
Can we distribute our fund in our members.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Insurance law
which law provide properties destroyed due to riot...and under which section of the respective law..