Deepak Nair
16 February 2013 at 20:08
Dear Learned experts,
I am sorry to ask a non-legal question.
I am visiting this site after a long gap.
I find that many questions are shown as unavailable on clicking on the titles.
May I know the reason for this?? or is it happening only on my profile?? Please advise.
P Venu Gopal
16 February 2013 at 17:21
Dear Experts
(I applied under RTI Act, but they are not responding)
I sent a request to AP Land Records asking a file copy. The file belongs to my grandfather land, in which our family is having share. I sent the request with supporting documents in DTDC courier.
The covered delivered by courier on 16.10.2012. I did not get any response from them.
After two months, I spoke to the designated officer and sent another set of supporting documents in DTDC courier, which got delivered on 28.12.2012. I did not get any response.
Again on 29.01.2013, I sent a mail to Chief Commissioner explaining the issue.
Till date I did not get any information. I want that file copy urgently. How can I handle this. Is it right to send another request to Chief commissioner or to approach AP RTI Authorities with Central RTI authorities thru email.
Shall we send a CC to CS of the state. I want to take up this issue very seriously. Also guide me whether we can send request thru private couriers also or only thru govt. service like speed post / postal department. Please guide me.
Thank Q
PVG
vinod bansal
15 February 2013 at 21:14
territorial jurisdiction of district consumer foru
R/Sir Kindly provide me any citation in given situation where a vehicle was purchased & finaced from telmos Hisar and was also insured by Telmos Hisar as the telmos is agent of Reliance Gen Ins at Hisar.There is no branch office of Reliance at Hisar,this vehicle was stolen from Delhi but complaint was filed at Hisar by impleading Telmos as one of the opposite party.Now telmos has filed a application with a prayer to exonerate from the array of respondents.Our case is that as the vehicle was insured with reliance through their agent Telmos so DCDRF Hisar has territorial jurisdiction and telmos is necessary party,now case is fixed for 18-2-13 for orders,kindly provide me any citation Sir.Thanx in anticipation.regards Vinod Bansal Adv Jind
Ritika singh
15 February 2013 at 17:12
my client is a bank which needs to proceed by notice under section 13(4) for possession under sarfeasi however the secured asset is a shed with 200 animals ....what is the procedure prescribed or are there any prescribed guidelines for teh same ???......urgent action is required in the matter.
Sujitha
15 February 2013 at 13:35
Hi,
Greetings!!!
Pl advise on the procedure for availing passport for mentally handicapped person( DOB proof not available).
Rgds,
Sujitha
vipul shah
15 February 2013 at 11:26
MY CLIENTS SOME GANOTIYA DOING AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES REGULARLY ON AGRI.LAND IN WHICH THEY ARE GANOTIYA SINCE 1951 CAN THEY BECOME OWNER OF THAT LAND? SOME OTHER GANOTIYA HAVE DONE PROCEDURE IN 1994 AND THEY BECOME OWNER NOW WHAT THE OTHERS REMAINING GANOTIYA SHOULD DO TO BECOME OWNER OF THAT LAND?
T SANKAR RAO
15 February 2013 at 08:45
Sirs, There is an Apartments Association which is registered with the Registrar of Societies. One member acted as President for 12 years. Now a new body is elected. The Ex-president is not handing over records and accounts including cash balance to the new body.More than one month over. Is there any role of the Registrar of Socieities at this situation? or What to do? please advise
vipul shah
13 February 2013 at 20:14
ONE LISTED COMPANY HAVING PROPERTY MORTGAGE WITH BANK NOW THE LOAN BECOMES NPA BANK WANTS TO SELL THAT PROPERTY BUT ITAX DEPT.GIVEN NOTICE TO COMPANY REGARING ITS RIGHT TO SEIZE IT NOW WHOSE RIGHT FIRST BANK OR ITAX DEPT.?IF THE BANK HAS NOT REGD.CHARGE IN ROC THAN WHAT WILL HAPPEN?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Consumer matter
1. vehicle snatched on road by miscreants. insurance claim repudiated on the ground of fakeness license. driving license has nothing to do with the snatching/theft of vehicle. pls suggest some judgments on this specific point.
2. insurance issued at place 'A',
accident takes place at place 'B'
claim repudiated by insurace company by its office at place 'C'
is complaint maintaniable as place 'C', as part of cause of action arises at place 'C' also
ANY JUDGMENTS REGARDING THIS. ?