Mukul Anand
02 October 2017 at 19:06
Recently i ordered a cricket bat priced Rs 9000 at flipcart . I want to gift this to my team mate. So i ordered this at his address. But when he received the bat this was not the same as described in flipcart ad. So i asked flipcart to replace it. But flipcart did not deliver the genuine product which was promised in its ad.then i write to flipcart through its 'need help ' option , but flipcart took no action. I complain to consumer help number. They provide me a docket number and asked me to let know the flipcart about this docket number. I used the same 'Need help' option at flipcart and add the details. After two days i received a call from flipcart and they offered me to have refund. But i said i need the bat u promised. I am at Dhemaji district. And the seller is from Meerut. I want to complain to consumer court. Please guide me . Where should i complain and what is the procedure?
Regards
Mukul Anand
Sri
02 October 2017 at 00:57
Property is in the name of my mother and my my father is a co-applicant for the mortgage loan . My father expired 10 months back and now we are thinking of clearing the loan and get back the documents .
There is another loan in the same bank for my relative , surity property is also in the name of my relative , but my father signed as a guarantor and there is no asset in the name of my father .
Now the manager says that he will not give back the documets even we clear the loan unless my relatives loan also get cleared.
Does the manager has the right to not to give our documents ?
pundalika achyuta bhat
01 October 2017 at 18:09
Sir, Just I want to know other than "Marathi Language" being the Official State Language which of the other Languages are being recognised (for written communication purpose) under MCS Act. 1960.
Anonymous
30 September 2017 at 21:16
I was given compulsory retirement from Border Roads Organisation on the allegation of misappropriation and manipulation of documents and excess payment to contractors but there was a preliminary inquiry in which i was called to depose and and there was an assessment of the works executed/ paid buy Board of officers and it was found that there was no discrepancy and contractor were paid the amount withheld by the department through arbitration proceedings. Now department is not furnishing the Inquiry report and Board to assess the quantum of work executed and paid taking the shelter of exemption clauses of RTI Act.
P. Venu
30 September 2017 at 18:49
Let me apologise that this is not a query.
As a regular contributor to this August Forum, it highly unfortunate and extremely disappointing that we, the experts, have often been at loggerheads among ourselves disrupting, distracting and obstructing each other, thus bringing down its credibility and trustworthiness of the replies and discussions. Hence I shall be highly obliged if the Learned Experts would grant me the indulgence to place the following suggestions in order that situation could be redeemed:
1. We should strive to ensure that the replies, and their contents add value to the topic, replies and discussions.
2. We should strive to avoid any posting that does not add value.
3. We should not post “no reply”, as that itself is a reply and the expert earns points as if he has given a reply/suggestion.
4. Let us respect the querists who choose to make “anonymous” postings; they may have their own reasons and compulsions.
5. Let us not split the replies; it gives the impression that the expert is trying to garner extra points to his/her credit.
6. Let us not make any posting which gives the impression that the expert is trying to garner points without adding anything to the discussion.
7. Let us be professional, fair and considerate while posting difference opinion.
8. Let us not prolong the discussion whenever leads to confrontation.
9. Last but not least, let us all be united in upholding professional integrity.
I assure that I shall follow the above suggestions, and any further suggestions in this context from the Learned Experts.
I apologise if the above suggestions have hurt any of my Learned Friends.
Minty Singh
30 September 2017 at 13:47
I want clarification that Ministry of Finance had upgraded grade pay of 4600 in place of 4200 for pre revised �scales of Rs 5000-8000, 5500-9000 and 6500-10500 �by the 6th CPC vide para 2.2.21(v) duly accepted and notified vide gazette notification dated 29/08/2008 and OM dated 13/11/2009. Since I am in the pre revised scale of 5000-8000 whether I am eligible for grade pay of 4600.. please advice.. Regards
Roop
28 September 2017 at 16:48
Hi Everyone,
I have loan of Axis Bank 2 loans. Both have 1lakh. Means total 2lakhs.
I have some family issues and left job last year in May2016.
After that my two Emi are on pending on both loans.
Now I get the job start paying emi till now I paid 4 emi.
Means start paying but every month emi only pending are still there.
Now I paying but every months second last day. Because I they told me if u not pay another emi your a/c Will NPA.
But I came to know that everything month they charged late fee.
I cant pay on 5th because on this month salary I paid on 2nd last day of month. My ECS is also bounce back. My EMI pending are one account 21 second 32 months loan tenure 5years........plz suggest
Anonymous
28 September 2017 at 13:30
There is some Internal Leakage from one bathroom in my flat and water is flowing down to below flats.
Society wants me carry out the repair and bear the cost.
I have not done any repair since the flat is purchased from builder. Wish to know this repair cost is to be borne entirely by me or has to be shared between me and below flat facing the problem.
Regds
prasad
28 September 2017 at 09:07
is it not time now to speak about judicial dishonesty when public receiving judgments based on no facts and by misinterpreting the higher courts judgments after waiting 10 to twenty years.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Karnataka land reforms amendment act 1998
Sir
In KLR act a tenant died in 1980 without filing application for occupacy right in 1998 second chance given by govt at that time tenants LRs 3 sons(major) filed form for occupancy right.
The 3 sons holding agriculture land of 12 acre each 4 acres.
The condition in KLR amdt act 1998 that land granted together land already held shall not exceed 5 acrea land.
Now while calculating ceiling on land holding all the LRs land clubbed and calculated? or they have treated separately?
Since there is no partition between them regarding all properties.
If we take ceiling of original tenant 12 acres more than ceiling area not eligible to grant.
Since deceased if we take individual ceiling of LRs it will be below 5 acres but no partirion between them.