tendulkar.S
12 April 2009 at 04:33
Dear Sirs,
I work as a security officer in bangalore for a reputed security agency, could anyone guide me about my rights in respect to subjects like esi, pf etc ???
sampat mane
11 April 2009 at 16:59
Dear Experts,
I am holding ICICI bank credit card and against my purchase I had made a payment by Internet. This payment did not reflect in my next statement as the intermediary (processing house bungled up with credit card no.).
Due to this i was charged exhorbitant penalty without any fault of mine. I argued with the ICICI bank and asked for reversal. ICICI bank did not help me in any form.
Hence I stopped usig the card and accordingly I mailed them the status.
Their was no reply but a statement charging me penalty for every month of non-payment of old dues (which was not).
Finally since i was holding a savings account with them, they deducted the amount arbitrarily without even prior informing me. I got a letter from them after 5 days of the deduction.
What action can i take against these arbitrary decision?
Where can I approach? i have copy of all the correspondence I have done with them and their reply on it.
Please Help
rgd
Aparna Mane
Urjit Shukla
11 April 2009 at 16:53
Dear experts,
plz informe me that how much cases are pending in diffrent type of courts in all over India.
Urjit Shukla
11 April 2009 at 16:42
Dear all experts,
As I want to know that Which type of Questions will arise in P.P.'s interview?
Plz give some exampel questions.
What should I have to prepair for interview?
Any other Instruction if any.
A.Mohamed Thaheer
11 April 2009 at 09:28
What is the legal implication of Rule 9 (6)(b) in the case of retired pensioner?
Case in Brief:
A govt. servant had no judicial proceeding pending on the date of retirement. But, there was only F.I.R. pending on the date of retirement and that too filed just 48 hours before retirement i.e. on 28-09-2004 for the alleged offence reportedly took place between 31-03-2001 12-04-2001.
All his retiral benefits withheld till date.
In such circumstances, what is the legal implication of the above shown rule?
Whether the high court has got power to supercede the rule to give his own reasoning and judgment. Is it not the violation of the constitution for having the rules framed under article 309 of the constitution?
Whether one high court can supercede the judgment of another high court in the same and similar situation and also to supreme court judgment.
Please,explain one by one indetail
Member (Account Deleted)
11 April 2009 at 08:57
Sir/Madam,
My unlce has invested in Snowcem Ltd company sum of Rs.20000 for FD scheme.Which was to be matured in year 2003.And company at the time of granting FD agreed in written to pay amount back at the date of maturity long with the interest rate pre decided.
But on date of maturity company only paid him the sum of Interest eligible at that time.And company did not paid him back their origional sum of Rs.20000 yet.
We are talking to companies from many years but company only respod us by saying that they are ready to pay back the FD deposit by giving only Rs.10000 and with condition that we are agreed to forgo our right on remaining Rs.10000.
The company has cheated to many other persons by the same.What should be done by my unlce?And how they can approach to the same case?
Thanks
fowmina c
11 April 2009 at 02:05
WITH REFERENCE TO WAR CRIMES ANALYZE THE OBLIGATIONS OF PARTIES TO AN ARMED CONFLICTS TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN CIVILIAN AND MILITARY TARGETS WHEN THE COMBATANTS OF INE SIDE INITATES MILITARY ACTIONS FROM WITH CIVILIAN AREAS ..?
EXAMPLE = SRINLANKA 2008-2009
V.V.RAMDAS
09 April 2009 at 23:34
Sir/Madad
Please do provide upto date case law of SC in connection with Accident case Law.If the accused driver is charge sheeted u/s 181 M.V Act for not haveing a driviling licence at the time of accident. Whether the insurance comany is liable for payment of Compensation amount/awarded amount. Should the compay 1st pay and get it recovered from the owner? Reply urgent.
S.N.Derashri
09 April 2009 at 21:18
Please qoute some latest authorities from Supreme court as well as any of the High Court holding a compulsory retirement pending DE is illegal and void ab initio.
S.N.Derashri
Member Strength 9,46,713 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
query regarding the fillling the case
Respected sir,
my client's fateher was servicing as lascer in the air force after the death of the said fellow his son appled for the compensatiate service airforce passed his sanctioned and offered D catagory job but myclient denied and demanded the C catagory then airforce did not given any co-peration so my client went in the tribunal at ahmedabad tribunal has been given directions to do proper within three months of the order of tribunal but after the 3 to 4 year airforce replied that ur application does not comes into the pervie of merits hence ur application is rejected now what i have to do ?
can i do application in the highcourt for the contempt of the court in the tribunal for the not following the order within stipulated time?
can i go to high court against the order of the airforce ?
please give me reply thankin u in advance