Anonymous
30 September 2010 at 20:03
if some one infected by HIV and if there will be a law preventing him from marriage then will it amounts to violation of human right...?
Dear friends.. We may be hindu or muslim.. What ever may be the judgement.. This is the request to you who are getting favorable judgement.. Don't celebrate the judgement.. Don't hurt other's religion feels.. Same time this is request to you who are the other side.. No need to vexed with this judgement. If you not satisfied with the judgement mean we have the alternative remedy before our laws.. Please be calm.. We are indians.. Don't break our unity.. No need any more blood marked historys.. Love you india. ..tom..
Anonymous
30 September 2010 at 12:31
Is it legaly possible to settle the case of title suit out of court during the pendency of the case.
Similar to Ayodhya case another case is is pending at Guwahati high court. Case was lounched in 1960 by a group of business men against the Sevait for a temple in the heart of town having a good commercial advantage of the land. The father of the founder sevait died before world war II, when the sevait was a small child and one shopowner doing business in the shop in the front of the temple plot started looking after the accounts and maintance as appointed by the founder sevait becouse this businessman was a freind of founder sebait also., however there is no wrtitten evidence for that. When the sevait after growing up when asked for the handover of accounts and documents to him a group of bessinessmen started a case in lower court for the title suit and one after another they filed more than 30 cases in different courts and fortunately the cases were decided in favour of the sevait. Utimately the District Court gave verdict in 1975. After facing the defeat the businessmen group filed an appeal in high court. This apeal is still pending since than. Opposite party approcesd the sebait as declared by the district court for the out of court settlement. District Judge in his order declaerd thst the lan land is a debotter property and Idols of deity are the owner,and the brhamin is the sebait and his late father founded the temple and other properties with his own mens and money without the help of others. In the out of court settlement The opposite party wants to devide the land into two unequal halves one bigger half for the temple and related buildings and second smaller half for the residential and commercial use of sevait, Opposite party also wants separate RORs for the two halves one in the name of deity and another in the name of sevait - is this possible as an independedent owner.
Can some one give a legal opinion and correct comment on this.
D S Pradhan
Anonymous
30 September 2010 at 02:01
this is in mumbai.
the coop hg socty has filed a case on me for Recovery of Arreares;in 2001. i engaed a lawyer to represent me.the case is at the STAGE of CROSS EXMS. THE said lawyer is not present for last one yr.
In the given cercumstances i may require to defend myself. is it possible ? i;m i supose to give undertaking; if so;guide me accordingly. thanks !
R/Experts
In one of my case( consumer complaint against insurance Co.)Complainant has expired and now case is fixed for both parties evidence.Deceased has left behind him his mother and wife(widow)and two sons aged 3 years and 4 years respectively .How Can i proceed/continue my case.Kindly suggest.Thanx
SAUMITRA SINHA ROY
29 September 2010 at 15:58
I HAVE BOOKED A FLAT IN SILVASSA IN THE YEAR 2008. THE FLAT LOCATED AT SIXTH FLOOR OF THE BULDING. THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY GIVEN PERMISSION TO BUILDER FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FLATS. PRESENTLY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT GIVEN NOC ON THE GROUND THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE ADEQUTE EQUIPMENT TO DEAL WITH FIRE ABOVE 4TH FLOOR. HENCE FROM 5HT FLOOR ONWARDS OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE NOT BEEN ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT. I FAILED TO UNDERSTAND WHEN THE ONE DEPARTMENT GIVING CONSTRUCTION PERMISSION BUT OTHER (READ FIRE) DEPARTMENT NOT GIVING NOC . HENCE THE MANY PEOPLE IN SILVASSA LIKE ME ARE TERRIBLE CONDITIONS. PLEASE ADVISE WHAT WRE LEGAL REMEDIAL MEASURE CAN BE TAKEN.
Anonymous
29 September 2010 at 15:23
Dear sir
Pls provide the information that whether a District Bar Association refuses without giving any written intimatation to an advocate who wants membership of it and whether they can claimed that it is upto them to decide the membership and whether they can restrain the registering membership for more than one year?if not than how can we make them to enforce this?
Regards,
Vijay
Anonymous
29 September 2010 at 13:10
dear sir
i have filed a consumer case on behalf of my mother but i did not file Power of attorney with the plaint and now i want to file the POA whether i can file it now when proceedings are on?
Regards,
vijay,
whether private banks covered under RTI
Whether private Banks like HDFC, ICICI etc are covered under RTI. If so under what provisions and Who is the appellate Authority for appeal prevails.