Anonymous
10 July 2011 at 15:29
I have filed different complaints ( at Delhi) against different cheques in favour of my FOUR family members and filed as special power of attorney of complainant having personal knowledge of transaction being father/husband and filed only my affidavit in pre summoning evidence. All the complaints are distributed by the Ld. ACMM in different courts and all the courts have taken cognizance of offence on alonge my (SPA) Affidavit/evidence. On appearance of accused persons separately ( husband and wife in different complaints filed by me) have filed application u/s 145(2) with general and vague defence to call COMPLAINANT INSTEAD OF SPA, whose affidavit of record and courts are allowing their applications and directed me to file actual complainant affidavit and to produce him for cross examination instead of mine (SPA) on whose affidavit the cognizance was taken.
I have queries whether it is compulsory to give evidence of Complainant on the application of the accused filed u/s 145(2), whereas there was no affidavit of complainant on record till the application filed u/s 145(2) and the cognizance taken on the affidavit of father/husband as SPA.
Further I want to know if I contest the application of the accused and not give the evidence of actual complainant then what shall be the fate of my complaint.
Can the accused will success to bring all complaints in one court of M.M. on application to the ACMM to send all complaints to one M.M., whereas there are different complainant of one family and two different accused (husband/wife).
Thanking You,
anupam
10 July 2011 at 09:00
Hi,
If an Airforce/Army base is termed as restricted area in sign boards outside the base, under which law/provision its declared as restricted area and what are the rules that governs entry/exit of personel in the base.
Any help in this matter is highly appreciated.
Regards
Anupam
Anonymous
10 July 2011 at 00:55
A friend of mine was involved in a road accident when he hit a vehicle from the rear with his car causing damage to both vehicles. According to him the driver of the other car braked suddenly with led to the collision. A police van in the mean time reached the spot of the accident. Thereafter, this person refused to accept any monitory compensation offered and made my friend sign a declaration that he would pay the bill of the repairs, which my friend signed as he was apprehensive for his own safety, it being late at night, the area where it happened presumed unsafe and some bias showed by the police to the other person. Now, even after about 6 months, no repair bill has been sent but veiled threats are made if the said amount is not paid.
My question is, under the circumstance, what is my friend’s liability- he was not under influence nor did anyone get hurt and killed in the incident. Both vehicles were supposedly 1st party insured and my friend got the repairs done through insurance, and the other party must have done the same.
Please advice.
ravinder
09 July 2011 at 22:54
respective seniors.......
whatis a chitfund company...? and what is nidhi company...? are they different from orher companies as we finds ordinarily...!
Anonymous
09 July 2011 at 21:28
Respected Sir,
I am Dr. Rajkumar Hari Pol, from Karad (Dist-Satara, Maharashatra), I humbly request you to send me the citation or order of Hon'ble High court of Karnataka in which Notification of the Central Government dated 28.01.2003 so far as it is applicable to the co-operative banks is challenged in a writ petition before the Hon'ble High court of Karnataka. Consequently, proceedings initiated by the Malleswaram Co-operative Bank Ltd., against a borrower under Securitisation Act has been stayed. (Please send me this stay order)
Thank you.
My email address :
rajkumarpol@rediffmail.com
Cell : 9850755276
Anonymous
09 July 2011 at 20:09
what is the implications if Respondent has not responded to notice issued by High court on Appeal. The Responded is dead now. Will the High court issue the second notice on legal heirs.
Anonymous
09 July 2011 at 19:42
We have taken a term loan of Rs.2.40 crore for 60 months from nationalised bank for which along with capital and interest repayment amount is about rs. 8 lac monthly we have paid regularly for about 9 months now due to change in circumtances we have unable to pay this amount from last 2 months.
Please suggest me can we plan and ask bank to reduce the monthly payouts to rs.4 lacs and if bank does not agree what options we have as we are in service industry can we approach BIFR or any other agencies before the bank declare our account as NPA or go for securitication act.
thank you
Knowledge Gainer
09 July 2011 at 16:02
CAN SOCIETY APPROACH TO THE REGISTRAR OF THE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY AND LEVY PENALTY U/S 101 OF THE MAHARASHTRA CO-OP SOCIETY ACT 1960 FOR RECOVERY OF AMOUNT FOR BUILDING REPAIRING WHICH IS NOT CHARGED IN THE BILL. ONLY VERBAL DEMAND IS RAISED AND 30% OF THE MEMBERS PAID THE AMOUNT? AD HOC AMOUNT OF RS. 20,000/- BASED ON STRUCTURAL AUDITORS REPORT IS DEMANDED. NO BILL IS RAISED.
ALSO CAN THE AUDITOR OF THE SOCIETY RECOMMEND TO LEVY PENALTY FOR NON PAYMENT OF THE ABOVE AMOUNT AND APPROACH TO REGISTRAR U/S 101 FOR RECOVERY OF THE AMOUNT WHICH IS NOT BILLED BY THE SOCIETY?
WILL ANSWER DIFFER UNDER MAHARASHTRA CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY ACT, 1960?
Anonymous
08 July 2011 at 23:16
iam a store manager in the company and when leave the company they promise me to releave my pf money now they cnant even attend my phone and plz give me the proper suggestion what can i do.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
License for Cattering business.
I want to know what kind of Licenses are required for cattering business. I wanna start "Tiffin Services". Can anyone plz help me............