Victor
28 June 2012 at 15:34
There was an error in recording the reading of electricity consumption meter by a line man of ap electricity dept. Subsequently the electricity billing dept sent a huge bill which is 17 times more than the average consumption of any month.
Later on line man admitted verbally that reading was wrongly noted, now instead of sending the revised bill, he disconnected the power.
Now as a ordinary citizen what right we have, does electricity dept has right to disconnect without intimation to the consumer?
Reetu Bhandari
28 June 2012 at 13:17
hello,
the rate per unit of electricity mentioned in agreement was Rs.6 when actual rate as prescribed by concerned authority was 3 . Now when the rate has come up to Rs.3.7 per unit the landlord has mentioned that Rs.7 per unit will be charged per unit of electricity (by renewing the rent agreement)w.e.f july.
i dont see any sense for what he has done..i am not concerned about the fact that we will have to pay more, but the thing is that it is totally insensible..whoever has any knowledge regarding this kind of matter will you plz suggest us what is the right of owner regarding deciding rates? and is there any remedy available for tenants who actually suffer from their owner??
Shlok
28 June 2012 at 08:49
Dear All,
I need your advise on the matter below:-
I would like to tell you that I informed my boss about my illness on 29/April/2012, and asked for two weeks leave and also approval from his side, but I did not receive any revert mail from his side, later on it was communicated to you that I further need to expand the leave period but again no confirmation from his side and more over over the telephone he told me to come to office as soon as possible but since this could not be the case so finally on 16/May/2012 I tendered my resignation the acceptance of which was not received.
Seeing the past trend of myself applying for leaves and no revert back from his side so I waited for his reply, I also got the information that he have hired another person in place of me so in a way it says that he have accepted my resignation. when I became capable of doing a job so I looked for another job and later on got the job.
But now he is threating me by saying that he will destroy my career and is also asking for giving 2 months salary, I want to ask which salary is he speaking the basic or the CTC because in my appointment letter it is not mentioned that the 2 months salary will be basic or the CTC.
Also kindly let me know what are the legal actions he can take and would also like to let you know that all the things were clear to my new company.
Please help
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
28 June 2012 at 03:42
Dear Sir,
We have become a victim of Business tactics and builder cheating that the Real estate builders like Supertech has using for trapping the novice consumers and exploiting them in the desire of home. The real facts are as follows:-
1. We have booked a flat no. 205 in CS10, project Capetown at Noida Sec 74 thru a broker name Marketing times Realty Sector 2 Noida but show off their presence as underwriter of the Supertech to consumers. The Broker team leader was a novice person who doesn't disclose all the hidden facts to us and in faith booked a flat of Supertech. The Broker first said that you can pay the initial booking amount and after that the 30% demand may come after booking of the flat and the rest of the amount you will have to pay at the time of possession. The Broker also not told that the all three applicants in the attached booking form must have to be in blood relation for getting loan sanction on the booked flat. The Broker also not told that if the demand may come to you and if you not pay that demand on time then the 24% interest will be applicable and charge by the Builder. The Broker also not told us that after booking if you want to cancel the flat then the builder may deduct 15 from the total amount we have paid o the builder.
2. We have signed the booking form on the broker faith that he was saying right to us. The booking form in the first page or on the front page doesn't contains the terms and conditions in bold noticeable characters and neither the broker may assist and indicate the consumers to read & explain the Terms and conditions intentional put in the middle of the booking form write in small context and in concise and neither nor the broker insist to read about and explain the first the term and conditions.
3. After the 60 days of booking we get 70% Demand which is Rs 35 Lakhs. We shocked that in short time how the demand may rise. The builder told us that he erect only pillars upto 7th floor so the demand comes 70 % while floor is not furnished. We request the builder that we have no idea that you demand in such an unlawful way although no work of our floor has completed till yet. The Builder also said that if not paid 24 % interest you have to bear. We said he Broker have not told about this interest thing. So kindly cancel our flat and may return our initial booking amount which we paid at the time of booking. The Builder Said that they will deduct 15 % from our amount which we have paid in this booked flat. We said we have no idea about it that after cancel of the booking the builder may deduct this amount in an unlawful way. The Broker also not told that in cancelation you will get your amount deducted. The Builder said that you have signed terms and conditions we said that your terms and conditions are in the middle of the form and the broker will turn the page himself and neglect the part of the terms and conditions to observe. We said the booking form is a temporary form not any authentication & validity in the eyes of law because anything done has to done on the registered proper document thru Registrar.
4. We after that meet four directors of the supertech one by one who said that they have a policy made for their personal unjust enrichment and unlawful purpose for the welfare & demands of the company staff and the chairman and directors of the company who get all the expenses deduct from the consumer who trapped accidentally in superech. We said that how you can charge 24% Interest although we are not using your living services of flat accessing neither nor any personal debt we have taken from you. We also try to meet R.K Arora chairman of Supertech but his secretary & security had stopped us for going to meet the chairman of supertech and leave the other supertech employees to look this matter. All the employees of supertech are so rough, shrewd, self indulgent and working only for the welfare of the Superetch Chairman and have no sympathy & human morality to the consumers and clients. We said that kindly refund our Rs 3 Lakhs as we actually paid at the time of booking but the supertech employee are adamant that they will deduct 15% i.e forty five thousand and the rest of the money will be return in 4-6 months timeframe . What this type of crooked activities the supertech may using for harming consumers who trapped by the Brokers whom the Supertech have given full rights to sell their flats on commission basis. The Supreme Court also made guidelines for the builder that no charge has to be taken by the builder of Car parking but the builders also charging Car parking into their additional charges rate with the flat BSP Cost.
5. Company Supertechlimited.com made wrong Rule for their personal undue enrichment which is against and opposite of the Doctrine of Public Policy.That this company first hide the complete Rule from the novice consumers who may entrap in their property flats when the customer wants to exit out from the booking flat this company in the Rule curtain against Indian law deduct 15% of the total amount paid to him and return the rest of the amount 85% in 4-5 months so that in the rest time period of the amount they also earned heavy interest and purchase new land for their projects in an unlawful and illegal business tactics. If the customer be unable to pay the demand money by the builder then this company also charge 24% heavy interest on agreed amount which they have not given any possession to consumers neither nor any consumer may taking advantage by living in their flat.It is totally bias that registrar of companies grant such Rule to make heavy loss to innocent consumers and the company flourishing thru illicit malpractices adopted by him and you grant power into their dirty hands to misuse the money for their personal undue advantage. If the some private company Ltd wants to make a Rule where Sexual assault & direct theft is valid under the company can this type of Rule be granted by ROC for the benefit of the one company and suffering by that thousands of people from the illegal Rule which is inconsistent with the Indian Legislation Laws..
How this type of Rule be allowed by the Registrar which is looting thousand of customers in the curtain of Rule which is void under Indian Apex Laws.
Now! We are writing to You to display again and again how the Builder like Supertech & their underwriters have looting the consumers and using their business tactics in the curtain of the Company and offices and drafting the booking form in a illusion way putting terms and conditions on page 3 or page 4 in minute font instead on first page . We want our paid amount Rs 3.0 Lakhs in full without any cutting as I am a only lady without any job support, without any husband support and alone and think to but a flat in Delhi with my hard earned money thru private teaching. I have paid the check by myself and now round and round day to day accesign the supertech office in sector 58 from Muzaffarnagar daily in the hope that I will get my full amount Rs 3.0 lakhs in one single day.
Kindly see all the documents attached with this letter.
FROM :-
From:-
Miss Aparana Goel,
210 South Civil Lines, Bulletin Colony,
Near Jhansi Ki Rani,
Muzaffarnagar -251001, U.P
MB:- 9319365499 , 9997473484.
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
28 June 2012 at 03:21
Dear Friends,
We have become a victim of Business tactics and builder cheating that the Real estate builders like Supertech has using for trapping the novice consumers and exploiting them in the desire of home. The real facts are as follows:-
1. We have booked a flat no. 205 in CS10, project Capetown at Noida Sec 74 thru a broker name Marketing times Realty Sector 2 Noida but show off their presence as underwriter of the Supertech to consumers. The Broker team leader was a novice person who doesn't disclose all the hidden facts to us and in faith booked a flat of Supertech. The Broker first said that you can pay the initial booking amount and after that the 30% demand may come after booking of the flat and the rest of the amount you will have to pay at the time of possession. The Broker also not told that the all three applicants in the attached booking form must have to be in blood relation for getting loan sanction on the booked flat. The Broker also not told that if the demand may come to you and if you not pay that demand on time then the 24% interest will be applicable and charge by the Builder. The Broker also not told us that after booking if you want to cancel the flat then the builder may deduct 15 from the total amount we have paid o the builder.
2. We have signed the booking form on the broker faith that he was saying right to us. The booking form in the first page or on the front page doesn't contains the terms and conditions in bold noticeable characters and neither the broker may assist and indicate the consumers to read & explain the Terms and conditions intentional put in the middle of the booking form write in small context and in concise and neither nor the broker insist to read about and explain the first the term and conditions.
3. After the 60 days of booking we get 70% Demand which is Rs 35 Lakhs. We shocked that in short time how the demand may rise. The builder told us that he erect only pillars upto 7th floor so the demand comes 70 % while floor is not furnished. We request the builder that we have no idea that you demand in such an unlawful way although no work of our floor has completed till yet. The Builder also said that if not paid 24 % interest you have to bear. We said he Broker have not told about this interest thing. So kindly cancel our flat and may return our initial booking amount which we paid at the time of booking. The Builder Said that they will deduct 15 % from our amount which we have paid in this booked flat. We said we have no idea about it that after cancel of the booking the builder may deduct this amount in an unlawful way. The Broker also not told that in cancelation you will get your amount deducted. The Builder said that you have signed terms and conditions we said that your terms and conditions are in the middle of the form and the broker will turn the page himself and neglect the part of the terms and conditions to observe. We said the booking form is a temporary form not any authentication & validity in the eyes of law because anything done has to done on the registered proper document thru Registrar.
4. We after that meet four directors of the supertech one by one who said that they have a policy made for their personal unjust enrichment and unlawful purpose for the welfare & demands of the company staff and the chairman and directors of the company who get all the expenses deduct from the consumer who trapped accidentally in superech. We said that how you can charge 24% Interest although we are not using your living services of flat accessing neither nor any personal debt we have taken from you. We also try to meet R.K Arora chairman of Supertech but his secretary & security had stopped us for going to meet the chairman of supertech and leave the other supertech employees to look this matter. All the employees of supertech are so rough, shrewd, self indulgent and working only for the welfare of the Superetch Chairman and have no sympathy & human morality to the consumers and clients. We said that kindly refund our Rs 3 Lakhs as we actually paid at the time of booking but the supertech employee are adamant that they will deduct 15% i.e forty five thousand and the rest of the money will be return in 4-6 months timeframe . What this type of crooked activities the supertech may using for harming consumers who trapped by the Brokers whom the Supertech have given full rights to sell their flats on commission basis. The Supreme Court also made guidelines for the builder that no charge has to be taken by the builder of Car parking but the builders also charging Car parking into their additional charges rate with the flat BSP Cost.
5. Company Supertechlimited.com made wrong Rule for their personal undue enrichment which is against and opposite of the Doctrine of Public Policy.That this company first hide the complete Rule from the novice consumers who may entrap in their property flats when the customer wants to exit out from the booking flat this company in the Rule curtain against Indian law deduct 15% of the total amount paid to him and return the rest of the amount 85% in 4-5 months so that in the rest time period of the amount they also earned heavy interest and purchase new land for their projects in an unlawful and illegal business tactics. If the customer be unable to pay the demand money by the builder then this company also charge 24% heavy interest on agreed amount which they have not given any possession to consumers neither nor any consumer may taking advantage by living in their flat.It is totally bias that registrar of companies grant such Rule to make heavy loss to innocent consumers and the company flourishing thru illicit malpractices adopted by him and you grant power into their dirty hands to misuse the money for their personal undue advantage. If the some private company Ltd wants to make a Rule where Sexual assault & direct theft is valid under the company can this type of Rule be granted by ROC for the benefit of the one company and suffering by that thousands of people from the illegal Rule which is inconsistent with the Indian Legislation Laws..
How this type of Rule be allowed by the Registrar which is looting thousand of customers in the curtain of Rule which is void under Indian Apex Laws.
Now! We are writing to You to display again and again how the Builder like Supertech & their underwriters have looting the consumers and using their business tactics in the curtain of the Company and offices and drafting the booking form in a illusion way putting terms and conditions on page 3 or page 4 in minute font instead on first page . We want our paid amount Rs 3.0 Lakhs in full without any cutting as I am a only lady without any job support, without any husband support and alone and think to but a flat in Delhi with my hard earned money thru private teaching. I have paid the check by myself and now round and round day to day accesign the supertech office in sector 58 from Muzaffarnagar daily in the hope that I will get my full amount Rs 3.0 lakhs in one single day.
Kindly see all the documents attached with this letter.
FROM :-
From:-
Miss Aparana Goel,
210 South Civil Lines, Bulletin Colony,
Near Jhansi Ki Rani,
Muzaffarnagar -251001, U.P
MB:- 9319365499 , 9997473484.
a k yogi
27 June 2012 at 22:52
sir, i was enrolled in air force in 2004.during my enrollment medical examination medical officer remarked that i am fit for all trades except AFSO trade.but after completion of basic training due to some clerical mistake or reason not known to me i was allotted afso trade. allotment to afso trade is acceptable upto a vision of 6/12 without glassses correctable to 6/6 with glasses. at my enrollment time my vision was LE 6/36 and RE 6/9 correctable to 6/6. i was not aware of all these facts. i paased out as an afso tradesmen.due to vision related jobs i got extra pressure on my vision and my eyesight deteriorated to 6/36 BOTH EYES but still correctable to 6/6.now i was feeling itching like problems in my eyes on during duties. so i reported to an iaf eye specialist. he told me that u should have not been allotted that trade and he recommended me for change to a suitable trade. my application in same regard is under process.now a same case came in my knowledge in which change of trade request was turned down saying that your eye sight is still 6/6 with glasses.sir, if same happens in my case ,can i go for a legal help and what are my chances. further appointing a lawer will put a financial burden on me, can i claim for that. and administration has taken an undertaking from me like i will not leave service for a period of seven years after re-mustering which not acceptable to me and many other points. sir it is unjustice because i was nowhere involved in wrong allottment.i m trying for several civil posts for betterment of carrer.now what positive can be done in my case, i want my trade must be changed. i have all intial mediacl documents and correspondence made regarding that application. sir please suggest some efficient lawers dealing such armed forces cases. i will be thankful to u.jai hind.
Mentally Depressed
27 June 2012 at 20:51
Dear Sir,
I need an Information that in any Bank, whether Guardian of any minor child could also be made as nominee in the same account?
RAJESH CHOUDHARY
27 June 2012 at 20:40
We have a pvt ltd company with 5 directors, one of the directors has been found mentally instable and he owns 6% in the company, as this is not helping us to grow the company nor with the issues raising everday. company is in losses for the tune of approx 30 lakhs and we offered this share holder Rs.3lakhs to transfer the share but he is not willing to do that, this has become a issue for us as we are not able to grow this nor get investments. Can we increase our capital and dilute his shares or can we have a meeting and vote for his exit. Please advise the right way.
Vikas Verma
27 June 2012 at 18:33
sir i was born in madhya pradesh . my dad is migrated from uttar pradesh to m p at 1992. i wanted information about how can i access a caste certificate from madhya pradesh government
the tehsildar of madhya pradesh is asking about the record of 1950 as my dad had migrated to mp in1992 so we dont have any record of 1950 What to do ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Disconnection of electricity supply
Dear Sir,
I am a consumer of Maharashtra state elct. dist. co. ltd. I want to know what the electricity act say about disconnection of supply due to non payment of bill.
On 23.06.2012 my connection was disconnected when we were not in town, due date was 20.06.2012. I am a residential user. No disconnection notice was served to me. Please guide me and action I can take against the MSEDCL.
Regards,
M K Ganatra