Zeeshan
13 October 2025 at 07:32
I have a case of 'declaration; pending against my tenant who make fake papers of shop and claim himself to be the owner of shop.
Previously I filled an application for Sending tenant's papers to 'CFSL' but it was rejected stating:'-
" the plaintiff wishes the court to conduct a roving enquiry on his behalf. In view of the aforesaid observation, the court is of the view that there is no merit in the applications of the plaintiff seeking comparisons/verification of the documents filed by the defendants. "
Now I decided to file an another application under section 45 Indian Evidence Act for sending my papers to 'PRIVATE FORENSIC LAB'. Therein I want to write following line:-
1. It seems that this court do not think or have somewhere in mind that the papers of tenant are not fake, that's why this court do not think that the papers of tenant need to be checked by forensic."
or
2. “It appears that this Court is of the view that the tenant’s documents are not forged, and therefore does not consider forensic examination of those documents necessary.”
or
3. “The Court seems to have accepted the authenticity of the tenant’s papers and consequently found no need to direct forensic verification.”
or
4. “It would appear that the Court does not entertain doubts about the genuineness of the tenant’s documents, and hence declined to order a forensic examination.”
or
5. “The Court appears to have formed the opinion that the tenant’s documents are genuine, which is why it did not deem forensic scrutiny necessary.”
Please suggest is it ok to write above line ?
Zeeshan
11 October 2025 at 20:01
I have a pending declaration case against the son of my tenant, who has created forged documents related to the shop, including fake signatures, stamps, and other falsified details.
I now wish to send these documents for examination by a forensic and handwriting expert.
Kindly advise under which legal provisions or sections I should submit an application to the court for such forensic analysis.
Thanks
Zeeshan
11 October 2025 at 01:21
Message deleted.
Message deleted.
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/modify_message.asp?entry_id=941251
Message deleted.
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/modify_message.asp?entry_id=941251
Message deleted.
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/modify_message.asp?entry_id=941251
Anonymous
10 October 2025 at 20:31
Hi, Am Shekhar a resident of Hyderabad. I have an elder brother. We both jointly own a residential property which is gifted by my mother through a gift deed. Right now due to financial requirements, my brother is persuading me to agree to the sell that property. Instead of selling it to a third person, I've proposed my brother that I'll take the full ownership of that property by giving him the amount equivalent of his share as per market, so that we don't need to look for a buyer for the property.
So, please help me what is the best way to take the full legal ownership of the property so that there wont be any legal issues in the future between me and my brother?
Additional information:
My mother is a widower and we are two sons. Am the younger one and unmarried.
My brother is married and has a daughter and son.
My mother has acquired the said property through Virasat from my grandfathers name and she has given it to both of us through a gift deed executed and registered at the local MRO office.
Zeeshan
03 October 2025 at 21:14
Please suggest fait of my case :-
BACKGROUND :-
My father purchased a property in 1984 from one Ms. Zulekhan through a Registered GPA, Agreement to Sell, Agreement Deed, and a Will Deed. We also possess the complete chain of ownership documents dating back to 1960, all supported by Registered GPAs.
The property includes several shops with tenants, one of whom was Mustakeem. His name appears in various property records as a tenant. However, he is not paying any rent. In 2014, my father served a legal notice to Mustakeem, but he did not respond. Subsequently, both my father and Mustakeem passed away in 2016.
LEGAL HISTORY:-
FIRST CASE (August 2016 – Bonafide Eviction):
After Mustakeem’s death, I filed a case for bonafide eviction against his legal heirs. In response, they submitted fake, unregistered documents (including a GPA and Agreement to Sell), claiming their father (Mustakeem) had purchased the shop from someone named Siraj. (only the shop). However, they could not produce any document proving that Siraj was ever the lawful owner.
Strangely, they also got a Registry executed in their name one month after I filed the Bonafide eviction case based on those unregistered documents.
On my advocate’s advice, I withdrew that eviction case, in August 2018 after I filled another 'Suit of Declaration.'
SECOND CASE ( May 2017)– Suit for Declaration:
In between, in MAY 2017, I filed a Suit for Declaration to establish ownership rights.
During proceedings, I requested the court to send the defendants' forged/unregistered documents for forensic examination, but the judge denied the request Stating,' petitioner wants roving enquiry in his behalf.'
The case is now at the Final Argument stage.
Please suggest Final outcome of my case.
THANKS
Zeeshan
30 September 2025 at 21:56
I have a case of Declaration pending with a tenant who claim himself to be the owner of my father's shop on the basis of fake papers.
In the court, I filled an application U/s 151 CPC for sending papers of tenant to forensic lab to verify papers and signatures. The court dismiss my application stating, :-
" the plaintiff wishes the court to conduct a roving enquiry on his behalf. In view of the aforesaid observation, the court is of the view that there is no merit in the applications of the plaintiff seeking comparisons/verification of the documents filed by the defendants. "
The reason is very vague .
Now I want to reach Highcourt. Please suggest me under which section/provision the case is to be filled in highcourt ?
Thanks.
Anonymous
24 September 2025 at 12:12
Vendor executed sale deed in 1964 for vacant plot in approved layout. Area of the plot comprised in 3 Survey Nos clearly shown in layout. Vendor missed area in one s.no.and manipulated dimensions of areas covered in the other s.nos. in such a way to cover total area of the plot as shown in layout. Rectification possible? or cancellation of sale deed is the solution. Both Vendor and buyer and their heirs are no more.
RKP
16 September 2025 at 02:34
I do want to rent my property/flat to any tenant with pets.
This is as per my wish.
I came across a tenant who threatened me of legal implication for refusing to rent the flat due to his pet.
Can the tenant with pet threaten a flat owner of legal implications for not renting him due to his pet?
Does not the landlord have his rights to decide whom he wants to rent the flat?
Amit
15 September 2025 at 23:51
I am in discussion with a landlord to develop his property based in Mumbai.
I will give him a portion of the building which will be made on his land.
What legal document can be executed to save stamp duty ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Double mortgage loan paid ,how to close loan?
Hello Sir, in 2016-17, a female family friend of mine took out a loan of ₹400,000 from a private financial institution for her business. The bank retained the original property documents as collateral. The mortgage was not registered. While she continued to pay EMIs, the EMI was increased by adding the moratorium interest from the COVID-19 period to the original loan amount. Due to the weakened financial situation after COVID-19, and the EMIs remaining unpaid after 2023, the institution obtained an order from the Tehsildar Court for physical possession of the property after taking symbolic possession. Against a loan of only ₹400,000, a total EMI of ₹860,000 has been paid so far, but the finance company has stated that approximately ₹250,000 remains to be recovered. What should be done in such a situation? Under which law and order can this be challenged, and in which court? Thank you, Sir.