Ritesh Jain
24 February 2011 at 10:52
I am a tenant in a paghdi building. Our building is a Cess A building. The building originally consisted of 24 tenanted premises. In the past five years the bulidng premises has increased to 36 with some illegal constructions and with the permission of the earlier landlord. Out of the 36 premises only 11 people who are the actual holder of the 24 premises have not given consent to the Developer. The Developer has entered into a deed of Conveyance with the Landlord and got it registered. The Developer himself is the Landlord at present. I alongwith the other 10 tenants who have not given their consent to the Developer / Landlord are not against the development of the property. The Developer is not providing the same usable area to us. I currently own and use 890 square feet carpet area. Our demand is to provide the same area as we were using, but he is not ready to provide us with the same. i am aware of the law that maximum we are entitled to 753 aquare feet carpet area. The negotiations with the Developer started in the year 2008. He has also started the Development work of the opposite building but i think that the work has stalled as there are tenants who are still residing in the building and have got a stay as per the rumours but the work is stalled. he is the same developer and a new person in the market.
My question is:
1)what area are we entitled to get.
2)there is a new ruling to be passed regarding area above 753 square feet will get a minimum of 890 square feet or thereabouts.
3)What will be the 70% figure? will it be the 24 original tenants or the new 36 tenants.
4)the Developer is alos not giving a bank guarantee.
5)can we form a society with the remaining number of tenants.
Parag
24 February 2011 at 07:51
whether land can be taken by the government if tenant dies without leaving legal heir as per Bombay Tenancy and Agricultur land Act
Sangeeta
23 February 2011 at 17:43
Dear Sirs
I would very much value your expert knowledge and guidance on the following matter:
We are a group of UK investors who trustingly invested in a new property development project in Navi Mumbai in 2009. However, due to irreconceivable differences between the 2 partners in 2010, the project did not go ahead and all investors were told that their monies would be returned in full plus 10% interest by December 2010. This has not happened and we are all having difficulties in reaching either of the partners and getting our monies back.
We want to know where we stand legally and what are out options in getting our money back.
Your advice and guidance is greatly appreciated.
Thanking you in advance.
HARE RAM
23 February 2011 at 17:29
SIR,
MY PROPERTY IS IN THE NAME OF MY LATE FATHER'S NAME UNDER HUF AND AFTER MY FATHER DEATH MY BROTHER HAVE ALREADY SELL HIS SHARE OF PROPERTY TO HIS BROTHER IN LOW NOW BROTHER IN LOW HAVE TO CASE ON ME FOR GIVE THE SHARE OF THE PROPERTY @50% ACCORDING TO THE HUF RULE PLS CLEAR THE LEAGL QUERY THAT THEY HAVE TRUE OR ANY RIGHTABLE CASE OR NOT
A YOGANANDA SWAMY
23 February 2011 at 17:29
Sir,
We have a OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE of our house taken from the Municipal office. Now we want to sell the house. Is the Ownership certificate is enough to sale the house?
Anonymous
23 February 2011 at 17:07
Hi,
We have the 40 bhiga lands in HUF.Now, If I wants to take our part from that, than can you please let me know what is the procedure for that.
JITENDRA RAMBHIA
23 February 2011 at 14:50
We live in pagdi system from 1976 in mumbai and there is dispute in family of landlord . Property is sold to builder in 2004 and he collects rents .
what are the rights a tenant should get if building goes for redevlopment ( additional area + corfus fund + rent etc)
.Kindly guide about rights
Anonymous
23 February 2011 at 10:19
My grandfather passed away before dividing his property between his 3 sons. My father too passed away before the division of property. Now my uncles want to divide the property. The property had six blocks which were rented since more than fifty years.All the guys whom it was rented vacated except one who is asking money to vacate since they have been staying there for more than fifty years and no rent has been taken from them or any such records are there.
Now my uncles are saying since ur father had agreed in written to get that block vacated u would have to pay for it and get done. But my question is since the division has not happened and since my father never rented that property but it was since my grandfathers time people have been staying there, why should i pay. And if division has to happen of that property everyone should bear that cost to get it vacated and then only division should be done legally. My uncles say they have written stamp paper of 100 rs. where my father had agreed to own that side of property and taken ownership to get it vacated himself. My mom says it was just a suggestion and roughly done on paper but the same was not registered legally.
I want help on this urgently and want to know best way goin forward,
Anonymous
22 February 2011 at 22:14
The clause: Provision for earlier termination: The lease may be terminated by either party by giving 3 months notice in writing or 3 months rent in lieu thereof.
I would like to know if I, Lessor, can terminate the lease by giving 3 months notice or 3 months rent? or is there any other way I can have my tenants vacate the premises? Does the clause entitle me to give the notice or the rent to vacate them?
Your reply would greatly help me.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Gift of immoveable property to son
If one son gets the immoveable house property ,gifted to him by the father under registered gift deed , can the other legal heirs challenge the validity of that gift deed.
Give some case laws.