LCI Learning
Master NDPS 2.0: Latest Legal Developments, Best Practices & Landmark Case Studies

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   25 September 2011 at 15:30

Agreement

hello sir.
we made agreement with our uncle on a stamp paper about our properties .In the presense of witnesses and lawyer.
notary was done for it.

is there a law which says if my uncle does not agree to the agreement we can take them to court and take legal action ?

hello good day   25 September 2011 at 12:03

Expert guidance

sjt.
namaste.

regret to disturb and thanking you in anticipation for your guidance.

in redevelopment, a flat has been allocated in exchaange of two tenancy right of two flats belonging to my father & grandpa respectively.

grandpa has filed a suit & rejoinder against builder in which he tries to project himself as KARTA of JOINT FAMILY with supporting documents belonging to him only.

like to know by filing the suit & Rejoinder as KARTA of JOINT FAMILY and not joint/co-owner of flat,

does this flat automatically become an JOINT FAMILY / HUF property ?

as a necessary party, if my father will have to join later
then

will it automatically mean it is my father's mutual consent/willingness to term this flat as JOINT FAMILY / HUF property ?

then what is position of present INDIVIDUAL SHARE of my father ?

regards.


gautam.

vinod sharma   25 September 2011 at 10:57

Cross examination

A PERSON HAS FILED A SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE ON THE BASIS OF A PHOTOCOPIED AGREEMENT AND A RECIEPT IN ORIGINAL . THE AGREEMENT HAS BEEN DENIED BY ME . THE CBI CFSL HAS DECLARED THE RECEIPT AS FORGED DOCUMENT . THE PLAINTIFF HAS SHOWN HIS SON AS THE ATTESTING WITNESS ON THE FORGED RECEIPT AND PHOTOCOPIED FORGED AGREEMENT . NOW MY QUERY IS THAT I WANT TO CROSS EXAMINE BOTH THE PLAINTIFF AND HIS SON IN THE COURT ON THE SAME SAME DAY . PREFEREBLY THE SON FIRST AND SIMULATEAOUSLY THE PLAINTIFF . IS THEREF ANY PROVISION IN THE LAW UN DER WHICH I CAN COMPEL THE PLAINTIFF AND HIS SON ( WITNESS ) TO BE CROSS EXAMINED ON THE SAME DAY . MY LAWYER IS SAYING THAT I CANNOT COMPEL THE PLAINTIFF TO BRING HIM SELF AND HIS SON FOR CROSS ON SAME SAY. FURTHER IF THE BOTH THE PLAINTIF AND HIS SON WHO IS THE ATTESTING WITNESS ARE NOT EXAMINED ON THE SAME DAY MY CASE WILL SUFFER VERY MUCH AS TRUTH AND FORGERY COMMITTED BY THE PLAINTIFF AND HIS SON MAY NOT COME OUT . REGARDS VK

Anonymous   25 September 2011 at 08:54

Ptcl land transfered in 1972 - now it is layout with 65 residents

Dear sir,

2 acres of land granted to SC/ST, we son't have grant copy and it is claimed in the sale deed that it is lost, but granted in the year 1939 (ref no is available).

grantee has sold this to our layout developer in the year 1972 without availing any permission from state govt. once PTCL has come, grantee has gone to AC for appeal for restoration but AC has denied because 15 years of restriction period is lapsed.

this land has converted in the year 2003 and formed layout with panchayat approval. now we have katha and paying taxes regularly.

at the time of purchase i was not aware about writ pending in the high court, writ filed in the year 2004. developer has not turned up because he had sold entire plots and now more than 50% houses also built.

high court has order for restoration, whether we have any grounds for appeal as a resident and whether we will successful.

judge is referring mysore land revenue act 1988, as transfer of granted land to depressed class is prohibited forever.this order is passed on 4th july 2011 by karnataka high court judge me. shylesh.

can you suggest us any case law to support us?

regards,
ramesh.N
bangalore

SYED MAHABOOB BASHA   24 September 2011 at 21:47

Freedom fighters land

Sir,

In Andra Pradesh the assignee who is land received from govt under Freedom Fighters qota.He want to sell his land after copletion of ten years.is there necessary to submit NOC issued by the R.D.O. with sale document to the Sub Registrar for Registration

Anonymous   24 September 2011 at 20:11

Poa

Power of Attorney executed and registered bilateral. and revoke by principal unilateral. and notice the same sent to POA holder and also publish in newspapers.is it right? Kindly advise.

Anonymous   24 September 2011 at 19:16

Agreement for sale of flat

sir,
I made an MOU with x in the month of june 2010 for sale of my flat"A" and took a token money of RS 3/- lakhs also with the person x which is also mentioned in the MOU.There is no time period mentioned in the MOU and also MOU speaks nothing more then the token money. In the month of august 2011,the person X entered into my flat "A" forcefully by breaking the lock BUT I came to know about it few days back of this month about it and also i have not lodged any complint in the police.Now because of such behaviour now I dont want to sell my flat "A" to X although the person X is ready to pay the money agreed in the MOU.I am also ready to return their token money but i will not sell my FLAT to such person.please suggest me .

Anonymous   24 September 2011 at 13:10

Execution of partition decree

sir,
my grandfather filed a partition suit in 1955 and after that my father contested the case and got the decree.Now in my time execution case is PENDING in the court.Almost all steps have concluded way back in the year 2008 itself.Nothing is left but still the court keeps my case for steps instead of passing an order for delivey of possession.Myself i am the decree holder .please suggest what should i do?should i go to high court?

Anonymous   24 September 2011 at 10:20

Kere nirmaanakkaagi bhooswaadheena gazette 1965

FEW DAYS BACK I ASKED FOR WHOM TO CONSULT IN CASE WE REQUIRE GAZETTE PERTAINING TO ABOVE SUBJECT BUT SO FAR NO ANSWER FOR THE SAME I HAVE NOT GOT.PLEASE HELP ME TO FIND THE SAME AT THE EARLIEST.THIS GAZETTE PERTAINS TO KENGERI HOBLI BM KAVAL PLEASE RESOLVE THE ISSUE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.AND EVEN I SUGGESTED TO ENRICH UR SITE BY PUTTING THE SCAN COPY OF REQUIRED GAZETTE IN YOUR SITE......AS EARLY AS POSSBILE SOLUTION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS ....

YOURS
L.SRINIVASAMURHY

gurmeet   24 September 2011 at 08:07

Sale of property without acquisition

Dear All,

I agreed to purchased a property in Delhi 15 days back. The broker wrote the agreement to sell in his own handwriting and the third party which was produced before me as "seller" signed the "agreement to sell" and took the advance. As the property was not freehold i was told in writing that next due payment will be made ony after "1 month or freehold-which ever is later".

Now i had came to know that the property was never purchased by the seller and only agreement as made with me for extracting money. Both broker and third party are involved in this fraud.

Even the stamp paper of Rs. 10/- was purchased by the broker in my name and not in the seller's name. Original copy of "agreement to sell" was kept by me with broker in good faith and i am having only photocopy of the said agreement.

Now what legal steps/remedies i can take to get my money back.

Regards