Tarun
17 October 2014 at 09:58
I am currently fighting a property case in the high court, in which, a decree was passed by judge, against me.
i still have a counter claim, on which there is no action taken, and the strong points of my case were not put up strongly by my attorney.
I in fact suspect foul play.
now what options do i have????
Pls if any1 can guide me, i will b grt help...
AKHILESH KUMAR
09 September 2014 at 10:39
Hello Sir,
I want to sell my agricultural land available in Disst Shahjahanpur, Tahsheel powayan, (UP) INDIA.
1. Purchaser wants to seek an agreement for one year in which half of the amount wants to pay me immediate at the time of agreement and rest half will pay me within one year.
MY QUESTIONS ARE-
2. If I create this type of agreement with him then what can be draw back for me in future if-
(a) He deny to pay rest amount within the period mentioned in agreement.
(b) He wants to withdraw & request for refund of his amount paid to me at the time of agreement (Because I will be unable to refund).
(c) What should be the language of agreement which can provide me safety / legal safety on all aspects as well (as a property owner).
(d) I want to add one more thing this property is my real uncle's name who is uneducated and I am his right to next.
Hereby, it is requested that please advise me that should I go with agreement if YES then how can I do healthy agreement without any kind of draw back.
AKHILESH KUMAR
Mob- 8808863665
aswini
03 September 2014 at 14:33
there is an agricultural proprerty with survey no 1 of 1.75 acres out of which .95 was acquired by government from middle of the land with name 1(2) and the remaining land was described as 1(1) and 1(3) respectively but as soon as the government acquired land there was a transfer in name of gift deed with no 1 what is the validity of the transaction? in order to make it valid what is the procedure
Venkat
03 September 2014 at 14:03
Hi,
One of my friends is planning to buy a undivided share(floor space) of a commercial building which pre-tenanted.
Seller is ready to mention undivided share(floor space) in the sale deed but refusing to mention about undivided share(land area), which I feel is very crucial to ascertain ownership. After bit of negotiation. seller is Ok to mention undivided share(land space) as proportionately but not ready to mention exact SQ ft in the sale deed. Is it Ok to proceed with such transactions?
vaishali jagtap
29 August 2014 at 11:40
A We are 3 sisters & my mother are living.
1. On 7/12 there are 28 members available. My father & my mother”s name are also on 7/12
My father passed away in 2004 & my mother is alive.
2.On FERFAR PATRAK there are 70 members are available (including those 7/12).All the member made one proposed society only on paper which is not regd yet. Who has land original paper that person himself become society chief . and this society chief had mad one society management team as per his own choice without knowledge of all members. In society management team may be 4 persons available.
B Now FOR LAND DEVELOPING one agreement is registered in july 2011 between 3 below.100 flat will be construct by the developer for all members. Land area is approximate 7 acre.
1. DEVELOPER(three persons)--who is investing money.
2. CONFIRMING PARTY(one person)---who had done all paper work procedure.
3. OWNER---- Whose name available on 7/12.
C. CONFIRMING PARTY approached us to give sign for registration. For that CONFIRMING PARTY will give 2 flat one for my father and one for my mother .For that CONFIRMING PARTY given sign on 100/- Rs Notary. One notary made between my mother & CONFIRMING PARTY. Second notary made between CONFIRMING PARTY & 3 sisters.Then my mother had gone for registration with my father death certificate. CONFIRMING PARTY told us that we should deduct my father name on 7/12 & make entry of 3 sisters on 7/12 which we have done. Later we learn that CONFIRMING PARTY has made fraud with us. When we ask all clarification to CONFIRMING PARTY then CONFIRMING PARTY started to avoid us.
D We had given sign for below reason.
1. we do not have original paper related land.
2. The CONFIRMING PARTY was from our caste.
3. My father is not alive who has some knowledge for this land.
4. society management team never called us after my father passed away.
E CONFIRMING PARTY was not giving equal benefite to us which he had given to another 7/12 persons. CONFIRMING PARTY wants sign of our 3 sisters on some paper. Which paper we do not know. Because of this CONFIRMING PARTY & DEVELOPER did not start construction yet.
F. The agreement is in favour of developer & CONFIRMING PARTY only. This was done because of society management team stupidity. However so many norms violated by developer & CONFIRMING PARTY .Now only society management team is coming to our home to give us trouble.They want only our sign which we are not giving.IF we want clarification they are not giving. We refused to give sign because developer & CONFIRMING PARTY are not showing all papers.
G. Now my questions are below for that we need clarification:
1. society management team directly say us to give sign on HAQ-SOD PATRA by notice. We replied of their notice.we ask some clarification as per their notice which they are not giving then what can we do?
2.Can we cancel registration of my mother individually? If yes how?
3. society management team is making false police complaint of cheating & blackmailing against us. society management team is calling us to police stn via police.we had gone to police stn more than 3 times and we refused to give sign on any paper. However police is always calling us.So what can we do against police?
4. we don’t have society off add, so how can we send notice to society management team?
5. If CONFIRMING PARTY & DEVELOPER are not accepting our notice more than 3 times what can we do?
6. If CONFIRMING PARTY & DEVELOPER are accepting our notice and did not give reply within time than what can we do?
7. society management team is saying that they will give us only one flat for mother only. so I am asking that 100/- Rs notary is enough to protect our interest? If not then what can we do?
8. Here land ratio is not happening like 70:30,60:40,So what can we do?
9. Like MOFA in maharashtra there is any law for developer and owner which can protect owner right?if yes what is that .
10. Until they (all of them) will not give our clarification then we will not able to know what exact fraud made with us. So Can we ask all clarification by notice to all of them?
john k
27 August 2014 at 08:28
Sir, we are in a process of redeeming our house which was mortgaged for several years without any documentation done from either side neither any land docs submitted to mortgagee. The mortgagee sold it to third party saying that my father sold it him, now whatever the circumstances are, both the mortgagee and the 3rd party buyer are willing to compromise with a certain amount of which we also agreed. Sir now what i'd like to know is should i mention both the parties (mortgagee, buyer) or only the mortgagee in the compromise document. What should i do. Would be grateful...!
Dear All,
I have purchased a piece of land from 3rd party with proper road mentioned in the registered sale seed along with sketch map of the road registered. The same sketch map showing the road is also registered by the 1st party owner of the land who sold the big portion of the land to 2nd party. The 1st party also mentioned 15 feet road provided to 2nd party in the south side of the plot in the registered sale deed of A0.200 dec land. Subsequently the 1st party also sold another A0.100 dec of the land to the same 2nd party showing the continuity of the said approach road of 15 feet in the south and also registered the sketch map of the road. All the transactions made by the 1st party to 2nd party was done in 1996 to 1999. Subsequently the 2nd party has sold part of both the plots (A0.200 dec and A0.100 dec) to 3rd party, 4th party and 5th party during 2002 to 2007. The same road is also shown in the sketch map and mentioned in the registered sale deed. I have purchased a piece of land of A.033 dec from out of the first A.200 dec during 2011 and same road is also mentioned in my registered sale deed and sketch map is also registered. The party no. 4 and 5 have constructed house during 2003 and staying there and using the road. My house construction is complete. Now party no 1 has made a gift deed in the name of his son for the remaining part of the land he has along with the road provided earlier to the 2nd party and using the gift deed the son of party no. 1 has made a boundary wall on the approached road and blocked the approached road to our house (party no.4,5, and me.). We are help less. The party no.1 is demanding huge money for the road. Kindly advise us. With great regards,
R K Satapathy
My issue is concerned with the applicability of Property Tax on "temporary structures" to the licensee holding a piece of land for the Land for setting up of temporary casting cum stacking yard to carry out pre-casting and pre-fabrication activities solely for the purpose of a Metro Rail Project.
The GHMC has slapped had issued a Property Tax Special Notice 2nd March 2014 Assessing the temporary structures of casting cum stacking yard for an amount of Rs.13,53,047/-
The concern is that how can we counter that the temporary casting and stacking yard are of temporary nature and can be removed after a specified period which has been given till 2015 and which does not attract property tax. As property tax can only be paid on the temporayy strutures
abhay dilip divate
29 May 2014 at 15:40
Respected Sir,
I want to know the validity of Sathe Khat and right of Sathekhat holder. Please go through the following example:
In year 1985 Mr.A had made a deal with Mr.B of 500 sq.m. land. Mr.A bought that land by making SATHEKHAT in front of NOTARY and paid him some amount amount of total price.
Today Mr.A has to sell the said property to another person by showing sathekhat.
In sale deed with another person will be consenting party.
So, my query is:
1. Can Mr.A sale the said property to another person by showing sathekhat.
2. Whether Mr.B (main owner) has right in his property to restraining to Mr.A?
Thanking you.
Regards,
Dhoka dayak imarat for pagadi system
Please Help us as the landlord is harassing us to vacate our residence which we are occupying since 45 years through pagadi system. He has somehow got TMC to declare this as dhoka dayak imarat. Dont know what happens next. what are the steps to be taken so as to retain our rights and not lose out. We still reside at the building, No one else is staying. Earlier it was occupied by the landlords who have left to some other place. They arent even declaring whether they have sold it or who is the new owner. Please advice. need your guidance urgently.The top floor is somewhat looking dangerous because they havent maintained it well nor do they maintain the whole building.We are in ground floor which is in good condition. just two storied building