Namaste. I am a partner of a firm located at rajkot/gujarat. this firm was constituted about 15 years ago by registering parnership firm and we had bout a property making document in favor of the partnership firm. Know for more then 10 years the firm is in sleeping mode and relation with my other partner of the firm is not good. so he neither taking any interest in dissolving the firm nor ready to give me my 50% share of the property. he isn't ready to issue me any poa. so please suggest me how can i get my share of property or right to sale out that my share of property. thank with regards. my contact detail is 8141740456 and my m a i l id is mukundkumar2009 at the rate g m a i l d o t c o m
Hello sir- my father says " No need to make will becoz after my death, my all properties self aquire and ancestral, automatic become my mother's name. And she has full rights of property. Is that true???
Kiran
14 November 2014 at 22:12
above the guideline value how much percent i can increase to sell a property, for example guideline value is 2000/sq ft, for how much can i increase and sell ?
BEENA SINGH
14 November 2014 at 16:45
Matter is as under:
The actual owner of land is Mr. A and his name was there on 7/12 extract. Thereafter, A sold the said land to B (i.e to Builder ) vide registered sale deed.
after obtaining the possession of said land builder constructed the building thereon and sold all the flats to flat purchasers.
After formation of the society of said building, builder handed over said plot of land along with building to society by registered conveyance deed.
However, builder had executed the said conveyance deed 10 years ago.
Now on the evident of that conveyance deed with the builder, society wants to transfer its name on 7/12 extract. However, talathi is not ready to transfer the name of society as, the name of Mr. B (Builder) was not transferred to 7/12 extract when he bought it from A. (i.e actual owner of land).
Now talathi is saying to transfer the name of society first you need to transfer the name of builder thereafter we can transfer it to society.
We had given all the proofs to talathi that builder had handed over the said land to society by deed of conveyance and it is accepted by him but his opinion is that he cannot transfer the name of society without transferring the name of Builder even though there is a proper of deed of conveyance.
Now the builder is not traceable and to transfer the name of builder on 7/12 extract he can only give the application.
Kindly advise me what is the further step that society can take to transfer its name on 7/12 extract.
namrata kaur
14 November 2014 at 15:39
Dear sir,
I,here by,want to know the act by which daughters are deprived of right to agriculture land in uttarakhand even if it is owned by father only,after the death of father.
mayank
14 November 2014 at 14:06
Dear All,
Please let me know the mandatory requirements for publishing a circular in newspaper.
I want to publish that - please don’t lend any money to my father and he is mentally incompetent. In case if anyone still lends money to him then nobody is liable/responsible for that debt.
dskiran
14 November 2014 at 12:30
Respected Sir, A,B,C & D are own brothers. They have Rs 100/- ancestral property(house & agricultural land) which was given by their father in 1964 and it was registered in revenue office as (ABCD)combined property.
In 1993 A forcefully made an agreement on Rs 50 non judicial bond paper by threatening B,C & D. As A-61%, B-19% C-13% D-7%. But it is not registered yet now. From the last 21 years every one is enjoying their own property by paying taxes on combined bill paper. Will agreement on Rs 50 non judicial stamp papers among 4 on brothers valid in court or not kindly answer my query sir thank you
AdYVPatil
14 November 2014 at 10:32
If release deed is executed without consideration by sisters, can it be challenged in court of law? If yes then on what ground?
Dinesh
14 November 2014 at 10:10
Dear Respected Experts,
Our society in Mumbai has gone for redevelopment. 2 Towers have already been constructed on a plot that was available in the society and no member had to vacate the current premises.
It took the builder 6 years to construct the 2 towers which he promised he would do in 2 and a half years.
Now to expedite the process of redevelopment, the society is asking the members to go for one flat in the current phase when it starts and take the other flat in the next phase.(We have an agreement wherein we will get 2 flats for the current flat we hold. eg., if we have 1 flat of 500 sqft we will get 2 flats of 500 sqft after redevelopment of the society)
Looking at the builders track record and also the committee members malafide intentions, we have decided against going for this option.
But the society has taken signtures of many members who they have convinced to go for the option of 1 flat now and 1 later. But many of them are those for whom one flat itself will be double their current small flat, hence they will anyways get one flat, so it does not make any difference to them.
Now the question I want to ask is : Can the society force the members to go for the option of one flat now and the other later, if the member does not feel secured to go for that option as the member will give up the flat and take one flat, but what if later on the project gets stuck and we do not get our 2nd flat!!! as once our original house is demolished, it'll be difficult to run after the builder to get our second house.
The committee has called a special general body meeting next week seeking to pass a resolution, saying on the request of members, 1 flat will be taken in the current phase n the other flat in the next phase.
They are showing it as if the members have requested for the same whereas it is the committee members and their cronies who are going around trying to convince people to opt for one house now and the other later.
Would appreciate your valuable advise in the matter and thank you all in advance for spending your valuable time in reading my query.
Thanks.
Division of portion
Hello Sir,
My dad owns a property and now wants to give it as a gift to both of us, me and my elder brother. Is there a law or rule saying that front portion will be given to so and so or is it Dad's wish?