Baskaran Kanakasabai
31 May 2010 at 17:44
The following sections of the LA Act,1894 refer to some registrable instrument(award?):
"51. Exemption from stamp duty and fees. - No award or agreement made under this Act shall be chargeable with stamp duty, and no person claiming under any such award or agreement shall be liable to pay any fee for a copy of the same.
[51A. Acceptance of certified copy as evidence. - In any proceeding under this Act, a certified copy of a document registered under the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908), including a copy given under section 57 of that Act, may be accepted as evidence of the transaction recorded in such document]".
Do these 2 paragraphs of LA Act,1894 mean
1. That an award or agreement made under this Act is registrable but not chargeable with stamp duty.
2. Person claiming under any such award or agreement shall be liable to pay any fee for a copy of the same obtainable from the Registrar.
3. In any proceeding under this Act, a certified copy of a document registered (by the acquiring LAO/Government) under the Registration Act,1908, including a copy given by the Registrar under section 57 of that Act, may be accepted as evidence of transaction recoded in such document.
4. The two paragraphs definitely refer to the registration of an instrument/ by the LAO in the LA process. What is that document?
or what are those documents?
Anonymous
31 May 2010 at 16:25
my father had four acre agriculture land in UP.It was ancestral property.my father sold this ancestral agriculture land with out my consent.can I file a suit to get my share back?
Anonymous
31 May 2010 at 15:12
we are three brothers and one sister.I am the youngest among all.my father has several ancestral agriculture land in UP.My father made a registered will of a major part of ancestral agriculture land in my favour in 2007 and all other legal heirs witnessed the registered will. Last year my father died at the age of 77 .After that Will was probated (two legal heirs witnessed the genuine ness of will and mutation was made in my name .Now my sister want his share in tis property.Is her claim legal?
Anonymous
31 May 2010 at 12:14
As per the land ceiling act u/s 37a, the Tamil Nadu state govt may permit to hold excess land u/s 37a for commercial purpose especially agrobased use, subject to satisfaction of rules/norms.
In this connection, I wish to know any one of the agrobased company or individual got permission for holding excess ceiling limit u/s 37a in Tamilnadu???
Is there any issued gazetted notification of state govt for permission for holding excessland u/s 37a ?
Anonymous
31 May 2010 at 12:03
I live in a prestigious condomonium in gurgaon under Haryana Apartments Ownership Act.
as per our house rules, incase a house maid who works in the same condo is employed by another person, a NOC needs to be taken from the previous employer.only then a pass for the maid can be recieved.
we employed a maid and got her pass made but it was cancelled by the Board of managers citing that we have not taken NOC from the previous employer. When the pass was made all documents were checked and no records was found and so the pass was issued by the Estate Manager of Condo.
when we asked the board of managers to tell us as to how we have violated the house rules they say that they are not under obligation to reply to our query and that the maid should not be allowed inside the colony else police action would be taken.
does the board of managers have the power to threaten the residents without even showing them the evidence.
off the records they have told that the earlier employer and not got the pass made so they dont have any records to share.
i think they should be taking action against the earlier employer for using the services of the maid for over a year without a pass and then question me.
the earlier employer is part of the board of managers.
what should i do? i am not liking the way they are trying to put a pressure on us. the letters which they send are very threatening with words like their decision is final and binding and they dont need to share any information with us.
MSC Shekar
31 May 2010 at 11:09
A Registered Gift Deed contains comments on Court Fee paid. I would like to know what the circumstances that account for such payment of Court Fee ?
Normally in case of Gift Deed the Plans are made in the name of the beneficiary, but in this particular Gift Deed the PLANS ARE STILL CONTINUING TO BE MARKED IN THE NAME OF THE EXECUTANT? Does it mean that the titles are kept pending?
Presence of Court Fee imply that a legal procedure was employed to get the Gift Deed Registered ?
RAVISHANKAR.M
31 May 2010 at 10:45
Dear Sir,
My question is whether a businessmen like me can buy agricultural lands in Karnataka inspite of not being an agriculturist.
I would like to state that, my mother had agri lands in her name and the same was sold about 8-9 years back. I have the copies of RTC, katha, mutation register copy etc till date.
Can I go ahead with these documents and I can produce the family tree wherein it can determined that, I am a part of her family as her second son.
Pl give me your valid suggestions about the above matter at the earliest.
Thanks & Regards,
RAVISHANKAR.M
ayush1ravi@yahoo.co.in
joydeep chatterjee
30 May 2010 at 22:53
we are selling the ground floor of our inherited dwelling house.what should be the proper procedure as a seller at the time or before selling.we are the three share holder in the proceedings so what will be the tax implications?pls help asap
Partha Roy
30 May 2010 at 22:53
On 17/08/2007 I had filed a writ petition in the Calcutta High Court challenging a Repossession Notice served on us purportedly under provisions of the SARFAESI Act under the following questions of law:
A. Whether the respondent Bank authorities concerned can proceed under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 without any mortgage being created on the concerned property by deposit of title deeds?
B. Whether the respondent Bank can disburse the loan to the promoter-developer without creating any Equitable Mortgage and/or Security Interest by deposit of title Deeds in respect of the concerned property?
C. Whether the respondent Bank authorities can proceed under provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 when the Complainant had repeatedly expressed their willingness to repay their loan in full, but the Bank had not accepted their offer?
The Hon'ble Justice Shri Soumitra Pal had passed an order as under:
1. Action of the Bank shall abide by the result of the writ application.
2.The point of maintainability of the writ petition is being kept open for mention by either party.
3.Bank to file 'affidavit-in-opposition' by 21/09/2007.
Meanwhile I had handed over the property to the Bank pending disposal of the writ.
The Bank did not contest the case but handed over possession of the property to the Builder who claims to have sold it to a 3rd Party.
Recently, I asked the Bank to refund Rs.3.25 Lakhs in my account but was told that it could not do so pending disposal of our writ petition.
What is the best action I can take under the given circumstances.
To learn more about the case and view relevant documents/orders one can visit
http://sites.google.com/site/merlinprojectsunionbanksite/ and
http://merlingreens.blogspot.com/
Can some kindhearted legal expert represent me on costs + commission basis.
Regards
Partha Roy
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
REGARDING A SALE DEED
Dear all,
My uncle has got a property by 1995 , wht happened is there is a mistake in the survey no and he is paying the property tax in the same survey number as that of the seller , he didnt notice the same for 15 yrs but now he wants to change the survey no by making a new deed , will the rate of sale be the sale as that of the old ,
The problem is the seller is not signing the deed, they are claiming the money as of now.
what should I do
Please help .