mk
10 July 2010 at 23:32
Sir,
panorama is a registerd trade mark under class 9.he is dealing mainly dish antennas & electronic products since 1996.but other person using same name PANORAMA for computer hardvare and computer antennas.the second person using this name since 1995.but he didn't have any trademark.my question is that , the second person have any right to use this name for dealing computer acessories?
Anonymous
30 June 2010 at 13:15
Dear sir,
We have 46 registered tradmarks and copyrights.
We are a well known SUPER BRAND.
One company in Mumbai is using our registered trade mark as their domain name.
eg. bajajmotors@yahoo.co.in
We gave them cease and desist letter.
It did not work .They ignored.
We took interim injunction but they remained absent from court.
We have ex-parte interlocutory injunction with us.
Unfortunately in our plaint we didnot specify domain name thing we stressed on Sign boards,visiting cards,letterheads etc.
Even judgement shows that court relied on these only to issue the order.
court did not take in to consideration the domain thing.
Now how do we prove in court/what is acceptable in court as evidence,if we were to put on record that this company is using till date our name as domain name despite court's order/injunction??
Should we produce a print out with affadavit etc ??
Will this be admissible in court as evidence?/
What are other ways of ensuring/proving our domain name fact in front of the court so that court issues a restraining order for domain name as well??
Thanks
R.K
G. ARAVINTHAN
27 June 2010 at 07:05
One "X" company filed a trademark suit against me. I have filed before Intellectual Property Board that i am prior user and having documents to that effect.
I have also filed a detailed written statement in the suit.
Case not listed before Intellectual Property Board. But District Judge has made the case in trial- special list.
Can the suit be stayed till the order from Intellectual Property Board?
citation if any?
Anonymous
23 June 2010 at 17:49
My Grandfather left a property in his four sons names which is in uttar Pradesh,this property is in the form of cinema hall 1.12 acres, all the brothers are living in this land in their own respected houses,with their families which they built with their own expences and of course the cinema hall is also included in this land.These brothers are staying with their families .Recently the eldest brother expired. Since i am one of the sons of my father, how can we claim our share of cinema property of which no BATWARA has been done and we want to claim our share .should i file a partition suit in the lower court to claim my share? directly in high court how many years would it take to claim our share of this plot where cinema is built? please guide
arvind mahajan
20 June 2010 at 16:16
Pls elaborate the legal research procedure with regard to LPOs & what does disposition mean ( in lpos )?
Anonymous
17 June 2010 at 16:17
A Housing society alloted a land to a member thru sale deed and after 14 years this has been cancelled by the society based on the order received from Dy.Registrar of Co-operative society for not constructed a building by the memebr within stipulated period and also for maintenance charges not paid by the member. The society has formally sent notice thru registered post to the member and also published in the news paper before execution of cancellation of deed. Further, this property has been re-alloted to another member thru sale deed. My query is:
1) Whether Registrar, Co-operative society can issue a order to cancel the sale deed?
2) Cancellation deed executed by housing society is legally valid?
3) Who (1st member or 2nd member) has legal title on this property?
G. ARAVINTHAN
13 June 2010 at 08:04
Where to file appeal against the order of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board>
pankaj jain
12 June 2010 at 09:35
dear sir,
iam from the defence , a case is pending against my client in the trial court , as he has been accused of infringement of copyright in a literary work.. a chargesheet was filed before the trial court and there he was charged with section 68 of the copyright act.
my question is sir , is section 68 is sustainable or in other words is it applicable for the alleged offence. and moreover in the chargesheet the author of the book is not the complainant it is the police who has filed a complaint... as per the provisions of the copyright act the owner of the copyright is entitled to maintain a criminal action .
pankaj jain
11 June 2010 at 08:51
dear,
sirs,
iam from the defence and i am having difficulty in interpreting section 68 of the copyright Act that is penalty for making false statements for the purpose of deceiving or influencing any authority or officer.
tha lanuguage is not clear to me , I shall be obliged to you if you would interpret it for me.
regards.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
IPR
SIR
PLS ADVISE THERE IS ANY ADVANTAGE OF GOOD JOB ,IF IPR PERSUED.