Right time for plea bargain in impersonation case ipc419 420 34
jky
(Querist) 18 July 2014
This query is : Resolved
1. FIR registered on 14Dec2013 with IPC 419/420/34
2. Accused Sandeep remained in jail for a month because bail rejected many times
3. Chargesheet summary :
Accused Sandeep asked someone to sit on his behalf in govt exam for promise of
money..Coaccussed Joginder caught in exam hall with original pancard,license,admitcard of
Sandeep..joginder also taken his mobile phone inside exam hall. on sandeep admit card there
was thumb impression of joginder...Both charged under IPC 419/420/34
4.After summon received then accused appeared on 11-July-2014 in Court of Hon GAJENDER
SINGH NAGAR tishazari.. .Order passed by court : Documents supplied.
Put up for scrutiny of documents and consideration on charge on 11.08.2014.
5.Next date of hearing 11.08.2014
Two questions :
1. Keeping in mind, accused Sandeep is Btech first class and was jobless
for 2 years and in that situation took this wrong step..
Can we file Plea Bargain in coming week, because we want accussed to be out of this case
and start his career in private sector. ??
2. looking at seriousness in case how much punishment possibly accused can get and also maximum punishment can happen..please tell by your experiences of such cases...we are mentally prepared for 1-2 months prison to close the case earliest..
I have full chargesheet on pc.if needed i can send through email.please drop me email jkypune@gmail.com
Sorry for length question...
Please guide us we had talked to many lawyers and everybody is guiding us differently....
Hoping for exact answers....
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 18 July 2014
without seeing case papers it is difficult to guide.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 19 July 2014
Mr./Ms. jky
Why to reply an anonymous author?
jky
(Querist) 19 July 2014
@Vashista sir
i am asking help from law experts..basically looking for opinion from their experiences of similar cases in life...If you can give your expert advice then that will help in making decisions...
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 19 July 2014
everyone who competes in competitive exam for govt job is jobless or atleast under employed. Nothing special about him.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 19 July 2014
What do you mean by bargain plea?
for Section 419: Punishment—Imprisonment for 3 years, or fine, or both—Cognizable—Bailable—Triable by any Magistrate—Compoundable by the person cheated with the permission of the court.
Under section 420:Punishment—Imprisonment for 7 years and fine—Cognizable—Non-bailable—Triable by Magistrate of the first class—Compoundable by the person cheated with the permission of the court.
Now you have to engage a prudent lawyer who can fight out your case as per your desire.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 20 July 2014
I slightly differ with the opinion of Sudhir that there is no plea bargaining in India.
Chapter 21A – Plea Bargaining
Section 265A – Application of the Chapter
This Chapter shall apply in respect of an accused against whom-
the report has been forwarded by the officer in charge of the police station under section 173 alleging therein that an offence appears to have been committed by him other than an offence for which the punishment of death or of imprisonment for life or of imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years has been provided under the law for the time being in force; or
a Magistrate has taken cognizance of an offence on complaint, other than an offence for which the punishment of death or of imprisonment for life or of imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years, has been provided under the law for the time being in force, and after examining complainant and witnesses under section 200, issued the process under section 204,
but does not apply where such offence affects the socio-economic condition of the country or has been committed against a woman, or a child below the age of fourteen years.
For the purposes of Sub-Section (1), the Central Government shall, by notification, determine the offences under the law for the time being in force which shall be the offences affecting the socio-economic condition of the country.
Section 265B – Application for plea bargaining
A person accused of an offence may file an application for plea bargaining in the Court in which such offence is pending for trial.
The application under Sub-Section (1) shall contain a brief description of the case relating to which the application is filed including the offence to which the case relates and shall be accompanied by an affidavit sworn by the accused stating therein that he has voluntarily preferred, after understanding the nature and extent of punishment provided under the law for the offence, the plea bargaining in his case and that he has not previously been convicted by a Court in a case in which he had been charged with the same offence.
After receiving the application under Sub-Section (1), the Court shall issue notice to the Public Prosecutor or the complainant of the case, as the case may be, and to the accused to appear on the date fixed for the case.
When the Public Prosecutor or the complainant of the case, as the case may be, and the accused appear on the date fixed under Sub-Section (3), the Court shall examine the accused in camera, where the other party in the case shall not be present, to satisfy itself that the accused has filed the application voluntarily and where-
the Court is satisfied that the application has been filed by the accused voluntarily, it shall provide time to the Public Prosecutor or the complainant of the case, as the case may be, and the accused to work out a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case which may include giving to the victim by the accused the compensation and other expenses during the case and thereafter fix the date for further hearing of the case;
the Court finds that the application has been filed involuntarily by the accused or he has previously been convicted by a Court in a case in which he had been charged with the same offence, it shall proceed further in accordance with the provisions of this Code from the stage such application has been filed under Sub-Section (1).
Section 265C – Guidelines for mutually satisfactory disposition
In working out a mutually satisfactory disposition under clause (a) of Sub-Section (4) of section 265B, the Court shall follow the following procedure, namely:
in a case instituted on a police report, the Court shall issue notice to the Public Prosecutor, the police officer who has investigated the case, the accused and the victim of the case to participate in the meeting to work out a satisfactory disposition of the case:
Provided that throughout such process of working out a satisfactory disposition of the case, it shall be the duty of the Court to ensure that the entire process is completed voluntarily by the parties participating in the meeting:
Provided further that the accused may, if he so desires, participate in such meeting with his pleader, if any, engaged in the case;
in a case instituted otherwise than on police report, the Court shall issue notice to the accused and the victim of the case to participate in a meeting to work out a satisfactory disposition of the case:
Provided that it shall be the duty of the Court to ensure, throughout such process of working out a satisfactory disposition of the case, that it is completed voluntarily by the parties participating in the meeting:
Provided further that if the victim of the case or the accused, as the case may be, so desires, he may participate in such meeting with his pleader engaged in the case.
Section 265D – Report of the mutually satisfactory disposition to be submitted before the Court
Where in a meeting under section 265C, a satisfactory disposition of the case has been worked out, the Court shall prepare a report of such disposition which shall be signed by the presiding officer of the Court and all other persons who participated in the meeting and if no such disposition has been worked out, the Court shall record such observation and proceed further in accordance with the provisions of this Code from the stage the application under Sub-Section (1) of section 265B has been filed in such case.
Section 265E – Disposal of the case
Where a satisfactory disposition of the case has been worked out under section 265D, the Court shall dispose of the case in the following manner, namely:
the Court shall award the compensation to the victim in accordance with the disposition under section 265D and hear the parties on the quantum of the punishment, releasing of the accused on probation of good conduct or after admonition under section 360 or for dealing with the accused under the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958(20 of 1958) or any other law for the time being in force and follow the procedure specified in the succeeding clauses for imposing the punishment on the accused;
after hearing the parties under clause a), if the Court is of the view that section 360 or the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958(20 of 1958) or any other law for the time being in force are attracted in the case of the accused, it may release the accused on probation or provide the benefit of any such law, as the case may be;
after hearing the parties under clause b), if the Court finds that minimum punishment has been provided under the law for the offence committed by the accused, it may sentence the accused to half of such minimum punishment;
in case after hearing the parties under clause b), the Court finds that the offence committed by the accused is not covered under clause b) or clause c), then, it may sentence the accused to one-fourth of the punishment provided or extendable, as the case may be, for such offence.
Section 265F – Judgment of the Court
The Court shall deliver its judgment in terms of section 265E in the open Court and the same shall be signed by the presiding officer of the Court.
Section 265G – Finality of the judgment
The judgment delivered by the Court under section 265G shall be final and no appeal (except the special leave petition under article 136 and writ petition under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution) shall lie in any Court against such judgment.
Section 265H – Power of the Court in plea bargaining
A Court shall have, for the purposes of discharging its functions under this Chapter, all the powers vested in respect of bail, trial of offences and other matters relating to the disposal of a cast in such Court under this Code.
Section 265I – Period of detention undergone by the accused to be set off against the sentence of imprisonment
The provisions of section 428 shall apply, for setting off the period of detention undergone by the accused against the sentence of imprisonment imposed under this Chapter, in the same manner as they apply in respect of the imprisonment under other provisions of this Code.
Section 265J – Savings
The provisions of this Chapter shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other provisions of this Code and nothing in such other provisions shall be construed to constrain the meaning of any provision of this Chapter.
Explanation – For the purposes of this Chapter, the expression “Public Prosecutor” has the meaning assigned to it under clause (u) of section 2 and includes an Assistant Public Prosecutor appointed under section 25.
Section 265K – Statements of accused not to be used
Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, the statements or facts stated by an accused in an application for plea bargaining filed under section 265B shall not be used for any other purpose except for the purpose of this Chapter.
Section 265L – Non-application of the Chapter
Nothing in this Chapter shall apply to any juvenile or child as defined in clause (k) of section 2 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (56 of 2000).”
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 21 July 2014
Mr./Ms. jky,
Despite the fact you remained anonymous, which is against the rules of this club/ platform not to reply anonymous querist, you must submit your deepest obligation to expert Sh. Raj Kumar Makkad for such a detailed legal preposition explained, that I concur and appreciate.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 21 July 2014
agree with Mr makkad
