voice transcription and cd/ recordings

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 29 May 2011 This query is : Resolved
Investigating ageny filed chargesheet only on the basis of voice recordings. There is no material evidence to prove bout the work. Since the work was already completed and relayed in the internet.

1. If there is a difference in the transcripted voice and the cd can it bae challenged
2. The voiice and recordings are in a regional language. The indepoenen witnesses who signed the voice transcription about the veracity do not know that language What action can be taken up against them,.
3. some of the voices are not translated
4. No demand for gratification or any thing to prove that bribe is demanded only eneral talk in the voice recordings.
5. The investigating agency didnot ollow the guidelines to be followe before laying trap.
competency of the person, ageneuineness of the comolainanat.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Arvind Singh Chauhan (Expert) 29 May 2011
Accused should move to High court for quashing of proceeding under 482 Cr.P.C., with all such plea.

M/s. Y-not legal services (Expert) 29 May 2011
In india, voice record not admittable.. Any one can creat that like any one's voice with one mimigry expert's help.. You can quash the the proceedings before high court.

Ravikant Soni (Expert) 29 May 2011
voice recordings are admissible in evidence and as same wait as other documentary evidence.
Go thru..
1- AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 1314 "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam v. L. K. Tripathi"
2- AIR 1986 SUPREME COURT 3 "Ram Singh v. Col. Ram Singh"
3- AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 3820 "State (N. C. T. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu"
4- AIR 1975 SUPREME COURT 1788 "Ziyauddin Burhanuddin Bukhari v. Brijmohan Ramdass Mehra"
5- AIR 1973 SUPREME COURT 157 "R. M. Malkani v. State of Maharashtra"
6- AIR 1964 SUPREME COURT 72 "S. Partap Singh v. State of Punjab"