hindu sucession act section 6
R.Arunachalam
(Querist) 26 September 2013
This query is : Resolved
hai everybody,
please clarify whether the daughter can claim partition in the estate of her coparcenary father who died in the year 1966
but continued the coparcenary of the co-ownership till the date of filing of suit?
Nadeem Qureshi
(Expert) 28 September 2013
yes, she can claim her share
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 28 September 2013
NOT: IF DWELLING HOUSE
YES: IF OTHER IMMOVABLE PROPERTY.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 28 September 2013
The matter is very much arguable.A succession opens soon a person dies and can not remain devolution less awaiting amendments to come forward in future to prove rights to those who do not have on date of death, forces me to answer in negative although a supreme court judgements given post amendments supports your claim with which i disagree with due respect.
The ground of a joint dwelling is no more a good defence to a suit of partition by a lady coparcener as the very section creating disability in this regard has been repealed.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 29 September 2013
She can definitely claim partition but her right shall not be equal to her brothers.
R.Arunachalam
(Querist) 01 October 2013
Dear mr prabhahar sigh thank you for your explaination. Please quote me the Supreme Court judgement reference quoted in your reply.
Guest
(Expert) 10 December 2014
Well Explained
Anirudh
(Expert) 10 December 2014
AN YEAR OLD QUERY.
THIS SORT OF GIMMICS WILL NOT WASH AWAY YOUR FALSE AND FRADULENT PROFILE.
THE NEW RIP WAN WINKLE HAS WOKEN UP!
THIS GOOD FOR NOTHING FELLOW IS TRYING TO RIDE ON THE EXPERTISE OF OTHER EXPERTS THAT TOO AFTER AN YEAR!
DESPERATION IS SHOWING ON THIS FELLOW.
This fellow cannot even be a last person one can consult for any advice.
This fellow is good for nothing. Many a times he gives advices which are not supported by law.
TAKE THIS FELLOWS FALSITY IN HIS PROFILE. THIS FELLOW ATTACHES MORE IMPORTANCE TO THE PROFILE, WHILE HE IS FILLING UP TOTAL FALSE HOOD IN HIS PROFILE.
please visit the following link:
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/lawyers_search/N-J-S-Rajkumar-alias-narasimha-254519.asp#.VIcRwmeHPFx
where he claims that he is practising from 2001, while as already indicated by me, he was enrolled only in the year 2012!!! CAN ANYBODY PRACTICE BEFORE ENROLMENT? IF ONE DOES SUCH A PRACTICE IS HE NOT FIT TO BE CALLED A "FRAUD"?
N.J.S.Rajkumar alias narasimha's Details
Listed Under
Business Law
Civil Law
Criminal Law
Practicing Since
2001
Specialization
SEBI and SEBI RELATED CASES
Court
Others
Address
54,PARASURAMA EASWARAN KOIL WEST MADA STREET,AYANAVARAM,CHENNAI 600023
Other Details
rajkumar_wins@rediffmail.com 9444036927
Therefore, before taking advice, the querist should be too careful
