Ni act case dismiss

RAVI SRIVASTAVA (Querist) 26 March 2025 This query is : Resolved
What is procedeure of Dismissal case in non presence of applicant under section 138 of NI act

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Quick Summary

If a complainant is absent or shows no interest in prosecuting a case under Section 138 of the NI Act, a court may dismiss it. While dismissal for non-prosecution is possible, courts must exercise this power judiciously. If a case is dismissed, the complainant may appeal, especially if their absence was justified and reasonable grounds, like a communication breakdown with their lawyer, can be provided.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 26 March 2025
If the complainant is continuously absent in the case and shows no interest in prosecuting the case then the court may dismiss the case for the same reason.

Advocate Bhartesh goyal (Expert) 26 March 2025
Generally court dismiss the case when either complainant does not appear in the court especially when their presence is required for recording statements.

Dr. J C Vashista (Expert) 27 March 2025
When the complainant has deposed in pre-summoning and post-summoning there is no requirement of complainant to be present on each date, if s/he is properly represented by his/her lawyer.
Be clear as to what is the actual problem and what is your locus standi ?

RAVI SRIVASTAVA (Querist) 27 March 2025
What is post procedure of matter of non presence of CmplainantDismissal case in NI Act

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 27 March 2025
What do you mean by post procedure of dismissal?
If the complaint has been dismissed he cannot do anything about it.
The complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act) can be dismissed for non-prosecution, meaning if the complainant fails to appear or prosecute the case, the court can dismiss it but this discretion must be exercised judiciously and fairly by the court.
However the complainant can appeal against the dismissal order, but the appeal may be allowed only if the appellant's non-appearance is justified and no prejudice would be caused to the respondent.

P. Venu

(Expert) 13 April 2025
What are the facts? Please post facts, not riddles.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 15 June 2025
If the case was dismissed because the complainant was absent on the hearing date, it is considered a dismissal "in default".
If the trial court dismissed the cheque bounce case for default, then you may prefer an appeal before high court seeking to set aside the lower court order and remit the same for trial.
The absence of the complainant or their counsel should not automatically lead to dismissal if there are valid reasons for their non-appearance Shri Ram Transport Finance Company Ltd VS Manju Devi - Himachal Pradesh (2020)N. Krishna Mohan VS S. K. Karnakaran - Madras (2011).
Courts emphasize the principle of natural justice, which requires that reasons for a party''s absence be considered before dismissing a case. If a summon has not been served, the dismissal may be deemed unjust Lokesh Pancholi VS Chaturbhuj Suthar - Rajasthan (2017)N. Krishna Mohan VS S. K. Karnakaran - Madras (2011).
A valid explanation for the complainant''s non-appearance, such as a communication gap with counsel, can lead to the allowance of an appeal against dismissal. Courts have shown willingness to set aside dismissal orders when the complainant provides reasonable grounds for their absence Raj Kumar VS Kavita - Punjab and Haryana (2018)Usha Maheshwari VS Arun Kumar Gupta - Delhi (2008).

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries