LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Sale certificate

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 22 December 2011 This query is : Resolved 
Pls let me know whether a sale Certificate can be issued by a debt recovery Tribunal, without considering a public action? Any Citation to explain this can also be shared....
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 15 January 2012
Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev and others vs State of Maharashtra and others [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 07 Feb 2011]
Banking & Finance - Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, ss. 13(2), 14 and 17 - Recovery of loan amount - Respondent no. 3 (Bank) had advanced a loan of Rs. 4,50,00,000/- to appellant no. 6 on an equitable mortgage by deposit of the title deeds of certain properties - Appellant Nos.1 to 5 and 'X' stood as personal guarantors to the said loan - On default of re-payment of loan amount, respondent no. 3 filed petition before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate u/s. 14 of the Act for taking possession of the secured assets - The Magistrate allowed the said application and directed the Assistant Registrar, to take possession of the mortgaged properties after issuing notice to the appellants - Being aggrieved by the said order, the appellants filed writ petition before HC - The HC dismissed said writ petition on the ground that an alternative remedy was available to the appellants u/s. 17 of the Act - The HC directed the respondents to maintain status quo in the matter for a period of 10 weeks from the date of its order, so as to enable the appellants to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal u/s. 17 of the Act - Hence, the instant appeals - Whether HC rightly dismissed writ petition filed by the appellants on the ground that an alternative remedy was available to the appellants? - Held, an action u/s. 14 of the Act constitutes an action taken after the stage of s. 13(4) of the Act, and therefore, the same would fall within the ambit of s. 17(1) of the Act - Thus, the Act itself contemplates an efficacious remedy for the borrower or any person affected by an action u/s. 13(4) of the Act, by providing for an appeal before the DRT - Therefore, the HC rightly dismissed the petition on the ground that an efficacious remedy was available to the appellants u/s. 17 of the Act - Impugned order was upheld - Appeals dismissed.
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (Expert) 15 January 2012
This citation deals with limited law , it does not absolve the lender to follow proper procedure.

Any sale certificate without auction is not legal.
Anirudh (Expert) 15 January 2012
I wonder whether the Debt Recovery Tribunal ever carries out any "Sales" by itself and whether issues any Sale Certificate at all?


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :