family law

kuldeep kumar (Querist) 30 July 2011 This query is : Resolved
pl explain me interpretation of sec 16 hma.it say if a decree of dissolution is passed instead of decree of annullment then children begotten are legitimate.
is there any scope in this section whereby we can say children are not legitimate.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 31 July 2011
What is the point?
They are anyway entitled to inherit the biological father.

Kirti Kar Tripathi (Expert) 31 July 2011
Position is absolutely clear in this regard. The children begotten are legitimate.there is no dispute.

Jitendar Kumar gupta (Expert) 03 August 2011
Pl. explain the facts so that considered opinion can be given

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Harrasement and metal agony from husband
Applicability of po act
Nps to old pension scheme
Suit filed by heirs claiming ancestral property
Hindu succession query
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Claiming ownership of the motor vehicle of a deceased person
Company name struck off by the registrar of companies

Consumer / contract dispute
Regular matters
Request for second opinion in bar council proceedings
Reinforcing rule-based adjudication in proceedings
Awaiting the shrewd advocate's answer.
Pl. check for legal accuracy
Legal notice used for harrasment
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law