Crpc u/s 167(5) contradict with u/s 468(b).

advramasubbu (Querist) 08 August 2014 This query is : Resolved
Crpc u/s 167(5) contradict with u/s 468(b) dear friends kindly share your point of views, the interpretation has been contradicted one with another.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 08 August 2014
This place is not for sharing views.
Post this in Forum section.

Dr J C Vashista (Expert) 09 August 2014
I agree with expert Sh. Devajyoti Barman

malipeddi jaggarao (Expert) 09 August 2014
I too agree with Expert Shri Barman ji.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 11 August 2014
I shall go with the experts stand on such issues.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Harrasement and metal agony from husband
Applicability of po act
Nps to old pension scheme
Suit filed by heirs claiming ancestral property
Hindu succession query
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Claiming ownership of the motor vehicle of a deceased person
Company name struck off by the registrar of companies

Consumer / contract dispute
Regular matters
Request for second opinion in bar council proceedings
Reinforcing rule-based adjudication in proceedings
Awaiting the shrewd advocate's answer.
Pl. check for legal accuracy
Legal notice used for harrasment
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law