Wrong facts in revenu court

anil kumar agarwal (Querist) 02 January 2012 This query is : Resolved
some agriculture land in way back in 1961 WAS ALLOTED TO three MENS JOINTLY , 1/4 TO A, 1/4 TO B [BROTHER OF A]1/2 TO C [FATHER IN LAW OF A] IN 2008 A FILED A SUITE AGAINST B IN REVENUE COURT AND SUBMITTED THAT NO PERSONS NAMED C EXITED IN THE VILLAGE AND HE ALONGWITH B IS CULTIVATING LAND FOR LAST 40 YEARS SO THERE SHARE BE DIVIDED, B AS RESPONEDED SUBMITED NO OBJECTION AND REVENUE COURT PASSED A DEGREE WHERBY A WAS DECLARED 3/4 0WNER AND B 1/4 OWNER. C SHARE DECLARED NIL. LATERON SUCCESSOR OF C FILED A CRIMINAL CASE UNDER 420 IPC , CAN A AND B PROSECUTED UNDER 420. 209. 120 IPC ON THIS COMPLAINT

Follow Query

Report Abuse

niranjan (Expert) 02 January 2012
If there is any such order,the same is without jurisdiction.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 02 January 2012
Both A & B are equally responsible for the crime as reported by you but some more sections should also be implied against them viz. 467/468/471/120B IPC and simultaneously a civil suit should also be filed seeking setting aside the alleged declaration of the revenue court and restore the land in the original shape means according to the shares of original owners.