Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 28 October 2010
This query is : Resolved
Dear Sirs, Please guide. I am CW 5. As per the complaint I told everything right during my evidence, but in cross exam., I was confused & the point was perceived differently. On the day of crime/theft we were abused/threatened with life this I told in evidence, but in cross exam, it was printed or may be I told ( when paper came for signature) I noticed that it was mentioned that, accused did not abused or threatened us. That was key point. We have one more evidence of witness of a lady is remaining. Out of 4 witnesses 3 are over with both evidence & cross. One witness is remains to be examined.
1.How Important it is? 2.Does this thing going to affect us adversely in the case? 3.Can this be rectified by the last witness?
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 28 October 2010
This seems to be in total contradictions of the deposition you made in your chief of examination. You should have pointed out this contradiction , if you did not deposed such thing at the time of putting your signature on the sheet of evidence. The subsequent witness only can testify the his own version on the facts alleged.
adv. rajeev ( rajoo )
(Expert) 29 October 2010
It is a contradiction, this benefit will be taken by the accused council while arguing. One witness is remaining let her depose everything and try to correct evidencde thru., her.
Kirti Kar Tripathi
(Expert) 29 October 2010
yes. it is a contradiction. But quilt of accused is depends on total evidence arrived in the material on records and gravity of this fact shall examined and be determined at the time of arguments along with other material.
s.subramanian
(Expert) 29 October 2010
Yes. I agree.
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup