Negotiable Instrument Act.

arun shokeen (Querist) 22 February 2011 This query is : Resolved
case filled in Gurgaon court on the basis of Complainant resident imn Gurgaon, Bank of complainant in Gurgaon ,legal Notice send from gurgaon and Opposite counsel move an application for quashing on the basisi of M/s harman Electronics case , although Magistrate himself said , case overruled bt mentioned authoiry of Pnjab and haryana high court ,is any supreme court authority that over rule harman electronics case because i red one article that mention 5 grounds and also about other things but that mention authority of 1999 thats why i ask that because of that this one.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Amit Minocha (Expert) 22 February 2011
if it is at par cheque , case is maintainable else it may be turned down according to me

adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) (Expert) 22 February 2011
Gurgoan court has got jurisdiction.

Adv Amit Kulkarni (Expert) 22 February 2011
gurgaon is absolute jurisdiction !

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (Expert) 22 February 2011
Hermann case is not overruled , it is SC citation.

PJANARDHANA REDDY (Expert) 22 February 2011
The 5 jurisdictions are even without Herman case is followed in NI ACT cases

arun shokeen (Querist) 22 February 2011
Thanks all for reply and suggestion but Sir if its answered with some authority then its a additional help for me, because its in written and i hv to reply in written

Advocate Bhartesh goyal (Expert) 23 February 2011
1999{7}JT 538 k.Bhaskaran v/s Sankaran Vaidhyan.See also A.I.R 2009 S.C 1359 Smt Shamshad Begum v/s B.Mohmmad.

Adinath@Avinash Patil (Expert) 01 March 2011
GO THROGH THE SHAMSHAD BEGUM CASE YOU WILL FIND ANSWER

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries