Title disputes
raja
(Querist) 13 January 2012
This query is : Resolved
Sir.,
This belongs to Andhrapradesh pattadar passbooks act-1971.
we say "X" have purchased the 2.15 acres land in year 1964-65 on sada bynama and from that time my names are recorded in pahanis. and year-2003 approached MRO for pattadar pass books and XIII-B CERTIFICATES. After conducting enqiury by MRO and issued pattadar passbooks,title deed and XIII-B certificates. but opposite party say "Y" approached Joint collector for cancellation of said Title deeds, Pass books and XIII-B. Then joint collector cancel the Title deeds, Pass books and XIII-B and felt that there is a dispute on land title, MRO or RDO or Joint collector is not deciding authority and directed the parties to go to civil court and civil court will decide the title of the land.
Now my question is
1. Who is go for the civil court whether "X" or "Y"
2. Is there any time limit for above.
3. If answer for (1) is "y", and he is not interested or willing to go civil court due to poor evidances in that case what is the remedy .
4. Joint collector cancell the MRO order i.e., Pass Books, Title deeds and XIII-B
what is the status of the land whether the land belongs to "X" or "Y".
Thank you sir.,
Sd/-
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 13 January 2012
1. X
2.AS SOON AS POSSIBLE,OTHERWISE 03 YEARS FOR DECLARATION OF RIGHT OF X FROM THE DATE OF ORDER.
3.YOU ALREADY KNOW X HAS TO BE PLAINTIFF AND NOT Y.
4.IF X SLEEPS AND DOES NOT FILE DESIRED SUIT Y MAY CLAIM ADVERSE TITLE AGAINST X OWNERSHIP AFTER 12 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF ORDER OF CANCELLATION PASSED AGAINST X.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 14 January 2012
1. Either of the parties.
2. Within 30 days of cancellation of patta passbook.
3. X can go to court in that event.
4. Nothing concrete can be opined without going through the detail of the case.
Deepak Nair
(Expert) 14 January 2012
Conflicting views by the experts. What would be the right answer?
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 14 January 2012
i ENDORSE THE VIEWS, NOTHING TO DIFFER.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 14 January 2012
Barman Sir! Conflicting views have been expressed by experts so whose views you are endorsing?
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 15 January 2012
1. agree with makkad sir., any one of them..
2.am differ from both of you., limitation can be calculate from the date of knowledge.. otherwise as of your both view., x or y no one have merits.,
3. law will help to the needy person only.. I MEAN WHO IS AGGRIEVED HE WILL GO TO COURT.,
4. no idea..
NOW AM ALSO IN THE RACE MAKKAD SIR AND PRABHAKAR SIR..
-TOM-
Advocate. Arunagiri
(Expert) 15 January 2012
1. X will go to the court, because he is the aggrieved person. X had purchased the property. Y has no locus standi in the case, because he is not the buyer or interested party, as per the given info.
2. The 30 days should be calculated only from the receipt of the order or knowledge.
3. This question does not arise for my opinion.
4. Status of the property:- If the sale purchase of X is cancelled, the previous person who was holding the title will be deemed to be a continuous owner.
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 15 January 2012
arunagiri sir., without voting to others you also participated as a new candidate..
ok.. i will vote for you..
-tom-
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 16 January 2012
I surprise,is there any appeal or suit has to be filed??????????
