Remaining on roll/strength of two govt departments

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 09 January 2012 This query is : Resolved
Goof Noon

I have been really disturb and worried about the following mishap for a long time. Please help me with your valuable advises, i will grateful to you.
I remained at the strength/Roll of two govt departments (PSUs) simultaneously for six months under duress(compulsion).The problem was when i joined my present Govt depptt( due to better pay scale) without proper relieving . I could not get proper relieving from my previous Govt depptt as they were not ready to relieve me before five year service.
during these six months(overlapping period,on the strength/roll of two govt depptt ) ,i neither withdraw any salary/perks nor gave any services to previous employer, though i remained on its strength/roll.
I concealed information about previous employer at the time of appointment at present Govt depptt. Although i have no mala fide intention other than getting a better job which my previous employer was not allowing.
my question is whether my simple falling on the strength/roll of previous employer would constitute double employment (Misconduct) for present employer or otherwise? would i lose my present job?
this is noteworthy that this whole scenario arised due non-supportive and nonprofessional attitude of my previous govt depptt.

Regads

Varun

Follow Query

Report Abuse

ajay sethi (Expert) 09 January 2012
repeated query .

M/s. Y-not legal services (Expert) 09 January 2012
yes., same facts but in different topics..

-tom-

Deepak Nair (Expert) 09 January 2012
Repeated query

Sankaranarayanan (Expert) 09 January 2012
Repeated query

prabhakar singh (Expert) 09 January 2012
repeated query .

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate Online

(Expert) 09 January 2012
You question
whether my simple falling on the strength/roll of previous employer would constitute double employment (Misconduct) for present employer or otherwise?

Ans : Yes.

would i lose my present job?

Ans : yes you can

Defence given by you in your reply is wholly irrelevant.

Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 09 January 2012
Repeated ...repeated....

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries