kalpesh
01 February 2015 at 19:48
i have some issues with my wife and she is living with my inlaws since 2007 with my son borned in 2005.i got married in 2003.my father was expired in 1988 and grand father expired in 1998.my wife put a property injunction case in my city trial court on behalf her and son.my lawyer saying that there is no VAAD KAARAN according hindu act 1956.he tried to dismiss wrong case by putting 7/11 petition but trial court rejected it.i didnot appeal in high court for this rejection and time for appeal has gone away.trial court timepass is teasing me.Is there any other way to quash this case in applying high court if there is no cause of action arise.my wife admitted in court about my son birth year and death year of father and grand father when her statement were taken
sunil karia
01 February 2015 at 18:07
I have filed a suit against an occupant of my house property in Mumbai. This was given on gratuitous license basis to him by my mother in 1982. My mother died in July 2011 & in May 2014 I terminated his License. In reply to the notice the occupant claimed that he had purchased the property from my mother. I am paying Property Taxes, the land records & Property Tax are in my mothers name. I Filed a suit in mall causes court. In WS the defendant falsely claims that he paid Rs.2,00,000/- to my mother (No Receipt)towards sale, So he claims that he is the owner. Also in the WS he claims that if he is not granted ownership then he should be given Licensee Rights. Further he also claims that he use pay property tax to us (which is false statement) & he has also paid Non-Agricultural Tax (which is because he is staying there so he got hold of the demand notice & paid about 4-5 times from 1982 to 2014) based on these payments he is claiming tenancy rights also i.e. if his claim of ownership is not accepted. My Query is can a defendant make such contradictory demands in single suit.
JAGANNATH RAO PARINAM
01 February 2015 at 17:15
I have shifted from Chandigarh to Hyderbad in 2012 .I had been filing I.tax returns till 2011 at Chandi garh.But after shifting to Hyderabad I had filed return for 2011-12 by online giving the Ward no. as per my residence in Hyderabad.But as per my PAN no. the jurisdiction is still shown as Chandigarh since I have not intimated change of address to Income tax office through NSDL.My income from other sources is Rs 800000/=appx. for 2013-14.I sold my house in Chandigarh in 2013 and constructed another house in Hyderabad.My question is ,can I still file my income tax return for 2013-14 (FY)manually at Chandigarh or I have to file in HYDERABAD .Now I don't have any residential address in Chandigarh.
Thanks
pjrao
Swapnil
01 February 2015 at 16:27
now the stage for cross examination of petitioner after exhibit nos. to the documents.
what steps taken by me against other side advocate as hell try to change the nature of suit from damages to defamation or file suit with out serve a legal notice. Its possible to take steps against other side advocate... or to stop this false suit....
mayur mayur
01 February 2015 at 16:20
Dear concern
my fact is as under
1)husband file divorce petition(desertion & cruelty)
2)wife file RCR petition
the both matter at final hearing(cross of petitioner) in that matter wife doesn't want divorce
now a days both had contacted to each other
wife tell her husband to i don't want divorce what should i do & husband tell his wife he need divorce
after that wife decide that she directly go to her matrimonial house & reside with her husband & father in law & mother in law.
now my query is whether it is possible by law that at the time of court proceeding wife can go to her matrimonial house & stay there
Swapnil
01 February 2015 at 16:10
Sir
If senior advocate not provide NOC or avoiding for the same, can its possible to cross examine the petitioner as party in person ?
How court will allow to cross examine the petitioner as party in person
Swapnil
01 February 2015 at 16:00
Sir
If senior advocate not provide NOC or avoiding for the same, can its possible to cross examine the petitioner as party in person ?
How court will allow to cross examine the petitioner as party in person
Swapnil
01 February 2015 at 15:48
Sir
If senior advocate not provide NOC or avoiding for the same, can its possible to cross examine the petitioner as party in person ?
How court will allow to cross examine the petitioner as party in person
Swapnil
01 February 2015 at 15:29
Sir
Petitioner file suit for sending blank envelops instead of legal notice now after filing WS, now petitioner file IA and mark exhibits and change the nature of suit from damages to defamation, so how can ill stop this suit.
Now matter is posted for last chance of cross examination of petitioner after giving exhibit nos.
pls guide me
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
For putting defamation case
i have some issues with my wife and she left my home in 2007.she went her parents home with my 2 years son and put a false case of 498a & domestic violence.both are runnig still today.in 2011 she send me a notice about injunction of property.after some days she published a AAM SOOCHNA in a leading news paper saying that i torchered her,demanded for dowry,forcibly bring her out etc.it has not been decided from court that i am culpit still today then how can she feel me ashamed before thousand people through paper news.can i put a petition against her for my defamation u/s 500,501 or other section may be pls advise