Rajendra
09 February 2015 at 20:14
Dear sir/ Madam ,
My great grand father has one daughter and 4 sons. My father is one of the son to my grand mother. she died 20 years ago. Till now ( from past 10 years) we are residenting in place which was given by my great grand father to my grand mother orally. now suddenly one of my uncle ( grand son of my great grand father) quarrel with my father for vacating the place immediately. Now my father is planning to file a suit against him. Is my father get any rights on my great grand father's property?? My uncle said that my father wouldn't get any right on my great grand father's property as he is son of my grand mother(lady). Now we are in trouble because we dont have any documents .But we are in possession in same place about 10 years. In revenue fair adagals also 4 son's ( great grand father's sons ) names are available but my grand mother's name is not there. MY uncle had only Fair adagal (RSR) copy no registration document is available with him. 1.Pleas explain me the rights of a daughter on his father's property ?? 2. will my father get any right on my great grand father's property? ? 3.If we file a suit against my uncle will we get property rights? ? 4. is revenue fair adagal (RSR) copy will give full rights on property pls explain.
Thanks
sekar
Dear Sir,
I had booked three tickets from IRCTC site on 03.11.2014 through IMPS P2M Pull Transaction (mobile banking) mode. And cancelled same and partially on Dt. 24.12.2104, 27.12.2014 and 02.01.2015. IRCTC accepted all my refunds 2days after my cancellation. Usually the amount credited in bank account within 7 days. But the amount not credited in my account even in 10th day. Then I call the banks head office and explained the situation, they credited the amount that day night (07.01.2015). Then I found that one credit is missed. Regarding the missing credit I requested through email and phone calls. I escalated this issue to CCSO of the bank. He advised the concerned dept. to send interim reply to customer. Then the concerned dept sent a reply to me that “This is IMPS P2M Pull transaction. Unless we receive funds from SBI we are not in a position to resolve the issue. The time limit to represent the issue with NPCI is 60 days from the date of transaction and hence there is no provision to lodge complaint in the system after 60 days. In the present case Customer done transaction on 03.11.2014 and cancelled ticket on 05.01.2015 system is not allowing. Hence we have escalated to NPCI and pursuing with NPCI for early resolution. This is for information”.
Till the date I didn’t get that refund. And I even understand who is the responsible one my Banker or IRCTC or SBI.
In the above reply he said transaction on 03.11.2014 and cancellation on 05.01.2015. But originally I canceled on 02.01.2015 and IRCTC refunded on 05.01.2015. IRCTC is saying we already refunded ask your banker.
Please let me know sir how to deal this issue.
parth
09 February 2015 at 18:21
hello,
I am a practicing lawyer in Gujarat.
I filed Cr.Misc. Appl. before JMFC invoking D.V. Act and successfully got interim order in my favour. The Opponents challenged the order before sessions court but they failed. Now I apprehend that they might go to high court too. I want to konw, is there any remedy like CAVEAT? which will ensure my opportunity of hearing?
I think High Court might admit their appeal/revision and might grant interim or ad-interim stay on implementation.
Is there any way out?
jassarora
09 February 2015 at 18:05
Hi,
Wanted to get a name trademarked but the name is already trademarked in some other class, So, is it possible to register the same name trademarked in other class and there wont't be any objection from others?
KIRAN
09 February 2015 at 17:41
Respected Sir / Madam,
1) I m a Govt. servent & my wife is housewife.We married in 2001. We have 2 kids one girl 12 yrs & one boy 10 yrs.Our married life was happy but there was interefence of her relatives.
2) In 2012 ( after 11yrs married life), my wife with 2 kids left my house willingly & immdtly after 15 days she filed false D.V case against us.
3)In 2013 (after 1 yr),I brought her to my house after compromised through Mahila sahayya kendra.We stayed together happily for 4 months. But she was not ready to withdraw D.V case & kept pressure on me.
4)Magistrate also suggested her to withdraw the case but she refused & from that day she was staying with her parents.
5) Then she filed false 498A case against me & my other six fmy. members.We challenged that FIR in High court. H/C had quashed the FIR against all six fmy. members except me. I have to face the trial.
6)She had not given any proof/evidence/ witness to prove D.V.
7)Now,D.V order is recd.on 01.12.2014 to pay maintenance for Rs 3000/-per month to my wife ( & 2kids)from dt. of order & compensation for Rs 50000/-to my wife due to physical & mental harrasment.
8)I have made Appeal in session court against that D.V. order as she had not given any proof to prove D.v.
9)(As court had given very less mntce to her.)After D.V. order my wife with both the kids iilegally entered in my house by breaking lock & door in absence of me.I have register complaint in police station against her. They have issued N.C But denied to register FIR since there no Divorse.
10)Now my wife with both the kids are stayiny with me. She has given formal evidence & denied allegations to withdraw 498A & wants to stay with me.
But I am afraiding she may register any false allegations against me in future.She is not accepting that her allegations are false & giving blame to me & my relatives who was not staying with us.
Kindly advice me,
i)can I take Affidavit/agreement from her for not to make any false complaint in future? What is procedure?
ii) Should I withdraw appeal to D.V. order?OR should i Keep appeal pending? Or continue the appeal proceeding in order to remove false D.V charges against me?or what is the procedure?
iii)Any other favourable advice for my safe side.
Sorry for long detailed history for better advice.
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
the propertry is under rajasthan public trust act 1959 and please tell me guide lines of auction regarding this property .
court is adjourning a civil case related to property for want of plaintiff evidence.
how many times court can adjourn under cpc rules. i intend to advise my lawyer to move application for dismissal of the case.
In case may lawyer not interest to move then what is the available recourse to me.
anil sharma
09 February 2015 at 15:43
श्रीमान
मेरा केस निचली कोर्ट ने डिक्री किया जिस पर विरोधी पार्टी के वकील ने कानूनी खामी निकालते हुए अपील की और स्टे की अप्लिकेशन लगाई है जिसमे उसने easment act and limitation act का हवाला दिया है पर इस बारे में निचले कोर्ट में कुछ नही बोला ना ही मेरे दुआर पेश एक्सपर्ट रिपोर्ट को बनाने वाले आर्किटेक्ट को ही परीक्षा के लिये ही बुलाने पर ही कोई सवाल उठाया अब इस बात सहित कई दोष निकाल रहा है
1967 के निर्णय के अनुसार कॉमन जगह पर कोई निर्माण नही किया जा सकता है पर विरोधियो ने मेरी अनुपस्तिथियों का लाभ उठाकर वहां खिड़की बनाली और उस पर छ्छज्जा बना लिया जबकि वहां नक़्शे में गेट था तो क्या easment act or 15 saal पहले बनाई खिड़की पर छज्जा लिमिटेशन एक्ट लागो होता है इसकालाभ विरोधी को मिल सकता है क्या
कृपया पूरी वास्तु स्थिति से अवगत कराये
N.J. MISHRA
09 February 2015 at 15:21
Dear Members need assistance from your end;
Actually i want an advocate to represent our case in District Forum, Mangalore, request you all to provide good references.
Effect of order quashed as null and void.
hi sir, a petition under dv act was filed by the lady/petitioner/wife before the judicial magistrate. during trial she moved a application under sec 21 for the custody of a male child and the same was dismissed looking to the welfare of the child. aggrived by the this order she/wife filed an appeal before sessions court and that was allowed and custody was handed over to her from husband. feeling aggrived by this husband filed a revision before honble high court and the same is allowed as the order passed by the magistrate and the session court are null and void. now husband filed a application to regain the custody of the child as the custody given by which order is illegal and he regain it or can the judicial magistrate order to regain custody.