pawan
11 December 2015 at 16:03
Thanks In Advance Brief History.
1) Builder A Pvt Ltd Co.sold me by sale deed a BASEMENT OR LOWER GROUND FLOOR NON RESIDENTIAL HALL SAPCE..
2) FOR FEW GOVT WORK BUILDER ASKED ME TO GIVE GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY WHICH I MADE AND IT WAS REGISTRED IN BUILDERS PERSONELL CAPACITY.
3) FOR MY WORK I USED THIS FORCOLLATERAL IN BANK AFTER 3 YEARS I CLEAR THE LOAN AND BANK RETURNED ALL DOCUMENTS,
3) I CAME TO KNOW THAT BUILDER USING MY GPA HAS MADE A SALE DEED IN SOME ONE ELSE NAME .I CAME TO KNOW ABOUT IT AFTER 5 YEARS JUST NOW.
4) FRAUD IS BUILDER ( GPA HOLDER) SOLD IT INSTED OF A HALL IN BASEMENT -AS MIG FLAT WITH 2 BED/2BATH/ D/D AND LOACTION AS GROUND FLOOR INSTED OF BASEMENT OR L.GFLR
PLEASE ADVICE.
1) WHAT ACTION I CAN TAKE TO CANCEL THIS DEED
2) NO PAYMENT HAS BEEN CREDITED TO ME.
AT PRESENT ONLY A LOCK IS THERE . CONSTRUCTION IS AS IT IS AS I PUCHASED .
PRADEEP KUMAR REDDY PAPPIREDDY
11 December 2015 at 15:35
Dear Sir, My Surname Was Wrongly Entered as
"PAPPIREDDYGARI" insted of "PAPPIREDDY"in my SSC Certificates.I have completed my SSC in March 2007 in Andhra Pradesh. in all other Documents my surname is "PAPPIREDDY" (Adhar Card, Ration Card, Voter ID etc...)Now i want to correct My Surname in my Certificates. How can i change it. Plese tell me the Procedure.
Niladri Das
11 December 2015 at 15:04
I work in one of the PSU banks in India. Due to some medical reasons, I remained absent from service from May 06, 2014. In January 2015, I wrote a letter to the bank citing reasons for my absence and expressed my desire to resume duty. The bank issued a showcause letter for not informing them and allowed me join office. However, due to separate medical reasons I was not in a position to resume office and I asked for extension of leave on medical grounds. On May 18, 2015, when I was fully fit, I went to the bank for resumption of duty. However, I was not allowed to join and I was just told that my case has been referred to Head Office. After a gap of four months, the bank decided to go for a medical board to ascertain whether my claims are genuine and whether I am fit enough to resume duty. The said medical board was conducted in September and the board referred the case to a hospital in state capital. After that the bank decided to conduct fresh medical board in a government medical college in the state capital in the month of September - October. After, two rounds of sitting, the medical board has declared me fit and I am still waiting for letter from bank to join service.
Assuming that bank will allow me join office in next few days, can I ask for compensation for the loss of service since May 18, 2015, as my claim of medically fit was endorsed by the medical board. what I feel is that the bank could have allowed me join office and could have conducted medical board thereafter if they were in any kind of doubt.
I request you to kindly advise me regarding my legal options.
thanks and regards,
MOTILAL JHALANI
11 December 2015 at 14:56
Sir,
I am a senior citizen of 70 years. So far as I remember there is a ruling of supreme Court stating that priority will be given to Senior Citizens in disposal of cases filed by them. Will any one please post the same to me.
Regards,
Motilal Jhalani
Raja Barari
11 December 2015 at 14:17
Hello Sir,
I was working at a company called Vrisini infotech from Jun '15. At beginning they promised me a salary of 35,000 per month. After 1.5 months they paid me only 8000. At the end of 2 month they paid me another 8000. After 2.5 months they asked me to leave immediately and said they will clear my dues by Aug '15. But till now they haven't cleared my dues and they are telling me "can you prove that you were an employee of vrisini". How can i take action against them ? I have email from company MD that i have joined vrisini and i am their employee.
avish
11 December 2015 at 14:05
dear sir/madam,
whether statement given by the employer in court that he was giving 12000/-p.m.salary in cash to deceased can act as an evidence for proving income of deceased.Also deceased has not filed ITR.
m.v.prabhakar
11 December 2015 at 13:08
In the charge sheet prosecution mentioned sections like 120B,420,467,471 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2). After an argument on charge prosecution proposed only 120B and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2). However while framing charges judge had all the charges as mentioned in the charge Sheet.
My querry is
1. Can the Judge add more charges beyond what has been mentioned by prosecution.
2. If yes,is the judge supposed to give the reasoning and facts for additional charge?
3.While pointing out on illegal sanction on the face it based on the relied upon document, Judge had ignored the observation and mentioned that if two views are there the views of the prosecution will prevail at the time of charge. IS he correct.
In the ruling of a four-Judge Bench of The Hon’ble Supreme Court in V.C. Shukla v. State Through C.B.I.,1980 Supplementary SCC 92 the trial court to consider the material placed by the accused to be considered. Kindly tell me even as on date this ruling holds good.
Shall be grateful and obliged for an appropriate reply.
A L ANTONY
11 December 2015 at 12:59
Sir,
I am a Christian married women with two children.
My grand mother inherited the properties of my grand father.
After the demise of my grand mother, the property was divided among the four sons. Since all the four were employed outside the state, it become difficult to manage the properties. A Power of attorney was, therefore, given to the elder brother by the other three brothers. The power of attorney authorized him to do whatever he felt good for the family. However, he sold a quite of number of plots and pocketed the money for himself. It is necessary to mention here that there was no addition to the property inherited from the grand father, either by him or by the other three brothers.
After a few years, he (to whom the power of attorney was given )and his wife, passed away , leaving the remaining property to the three brothers, including my father. The total area of the property was 195 cents including 30 cents where an old ancestral bungalow stood. Thus each of the three brothers inherited roughly 55 cents each. The property (30 cents) where the old bungalow situated, was again shared by the tree equally, i.e., 10 cents each. None of three brothers had added any property during their life time.
Subsequently, one of the three brothers, sold his share of 10 cents (1/3rd of 30 cents) in the bungalow property to my father during his life time, taking cash for consideration. Another 10 cents, owned by the other brother, willed away (gifted) his share of 10 cents to my father, who had passed away by that time.
My father has expired leaving a Will bequeathing the entire property (55 + 30= 85 cents) to my brothers. He was kind enough to give me 10 cents.
My question is –
1. Whether the 55 cents received by father could be considered as inherited property; if so what is my (and my two children) chance of getting a honorable share, instead of just 10 cents.
2. Secondly, as I mentioned earlier the 30 cents of land including the old ancestral bungalow, 1/3rd of which was inherited by him, 1/3rd was gifted and other 1/3rd was bought. Where do I stand in getting a reasonable share?
3. If the original Will left purportedly written by my father doesn’t constitute a valid will since was NOT registered and attested by two independent witnesses, However, this was deceitfully added.
4. I do not have any documentary evidence including copy of father’s will for the above. My mother, who hold the above 30 cents, now wants to give the property to my brothers. How can I stop it?
Kindly advise me
ROS
10.12.15
sunil kumavat
11 December 2015 at 12:47
i have deposited cheque which the party given instruction to STOP PAYMENT . can this be treated same way as that of cheque bounce or is there is any other procedure to handle
please guide .
sunil
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Tenants not paying rent in Pagdi system law
I have 10 shops in dombivli , Thane under pagdi system with the rents of 400-500 per shop but