Amol Jande
26 January 2016 at 20:36
Please help me.
1) PLANTIFF one of the son FILED A CASE OF PARTATION ON BASIS OF WILL/ PARTATION deed of Shankar annaji jande in 1990.
2) The will / PARTATION deed has forged signatures of his late father.
3) witness on PARTATION / will have given affidavit in the case long back that the signatures of Sankar annaji Jande are fake.
4) signature expert opinion is also received from CID pune which says signature are not written by Sankar annaji Jande.
5) PLANTIFF has kept suit pending for 24 years for settlement and doesn't run case.
6) we have moved application under sec 340 read with 195
7) case law of cl pangharkar , sanjive kumar Mittal was submitted.
8) judge has passed order to register application as miscellaneous judicial case .
Please tell me what to do now and how can civil matter get dismissed .
Also tell me how will this judicial case run and will the PLANTIFF get punishment .
My grandfather died in this tension and my father is looking in this case and since 24 years we are slogged . Please do help I will will be very great full.
k dayal
26 January 2016 at 18:37
In Jan 2000 I taken loan of Rs. 1,85,000/- from Illegal money lender. Against loan amount I handed over original property papers to money lender & also signed 2 documents. 1. Sale agreement on 100 Rs. stamp paper.In this agreement I confirmed that against my property I have received Rs. 2lakhs of final amount of Rs. 3 lakhs from wife of money lender and after getting pending amount of Rs.1 Lakh in one year I hand over my property to wife of money lender. & 2nnd agreement I signed was POA on 100 rs. stamp paper. In this POA I authorize money lender to sale my property.
I have return back loan amount but money lender avoided to hand over my property papers to me.
I have learnt from reliable sources that in May 2005 he misused POA and transferred my property in his wife name. Though till today he never demanded possession of my property. Due to some extremely tough conditions i-e death of my parents mom & dad & my brother illness I am not able to confirm from office of registrar wether money lender really transferred my property to his wife's name by misusing unregistered but notorised POA in May 2005. Kindly guide me whether it is possible that he transferred my property to his wife's name by misusing POA , if yes than advice me how I cancel sale deed and take any legal action against money lender. Also suggest me in future if he demand possession of property can legaly I am in position to refuse possession of my property. How can I confirm through sub registrar office about status of ownership of my property.
He is legaly right to transfer my property to his wife on unregistred POA , what judgement may come if I filled suit aginst him in Court of law.
4123320
26 January 2016 at 18:13
Hi,
I am Aasheesh Sharma residing in Thane and have a 2BHK apartment for which I received the possession in January 2008 after paying the demanded Corpus fund and obtaining the possession letter.
I later received 2 letters from builders via courier in August and December 2012 demanding VAT charges amounting to Rs 1.24 lacs which I did not acknowledge in view of ambiguity associated with payment of VAT charges.
I have now all of a sudden received court notice from my builder demanding VAT amount of 1.82 lacs (inclusive of interest). I have read few forums on the internet which states that VAT liabiloity is on builder following to Supreme Court ruling.
I am annexing the required document which confirms demand of VAT.
Can you please review this and advise if I am liable to pay VAT to the builder? Why did the builder not demand VAT between 2012 and now?
Vinay
26 January 2016 at 17:31
Dear experts,
I am in confusion situation now. Me and my dear wife separated 2.5 years back. Wife filed DV on me & my family. JMFC court granted 2k interim maintainance. After too many rounds of discussion decided to go for MCD. Alimony is fixed. partly should be paid @ time of MCD petion and rest at time of end. Meanwhile all counter cases should be withdrawn. My question is it wise to pay partly in MCD first motion. And give time to withdrawn DV. will it not back fire. Or shall I pay in alimony in DV pl suggest. Have a good day
Thanks
rajan chopra
26 January 2016 at 15:44
Sir in a summary suit filed by me the court directed me to serve the defendant with the help of P.S of court and copy of plaint and documents of the suit be given to the defendant at the time of his service and to file an affidavit on next date of hearing that defendant was served as per directions of the court.As the defendant being served as per directions of court I filed an affidavit on next date of hearing mentioning that defendant was served in my presence and copy of plaint and documents of suit were given to defendant.But the Judge ruled that the defendant is not served as in his report the process server has not mentioned that the copy of plaint and documents of suit were given to defendant while being served and asked me to again adopt the procedure to serve the defendant and I again compliance the order of Ld court.Now on next date of hearing may I pray to court that the court should consider the first service of defendant a valid service on the basis of my affidavit ?
anilkumar yadav
26 January 2016 at 15:23
Does the B.D.O. hace jurisdiction upon the area or village which is under the jurisdiction of MCD.
What are the effects of the notification u/s 507 of MCD, what changes does the area has or upon it's revenue matters.
sangeet singh
26 January 2016 at 15:17
My wife owned property in her name. though the purchase of the property was funded by me. he registered in my wife's name, now my wife is expired & i have 2 son, after 15 years death of my wife i have done second marriage. now my son say that after doing of my second marriage i am not shareholder of my expired wife property. and they are only 2 are the owner of his expired mother property. my question is they are right or not.....??
My Query:
1) after second marriage of me i am legal heir or shareholder of the property....??
(2) What are the steps to be taken by the transfer of property without any objection in my child.
Kindly advise.
Dr. MPS RAMANI Ph.D.[Tech.]
26 January 2016 at 15:01
My friend is an accused in a Section 138, NI Act allegation. The first hearing was in August, 2015 at which he was given bail. After that there has been no hearing at all. So far 5 times dates have been fixed. But when he goes to the court there will be no hearing as no magistrate has been appointed to hear the case. It is not known how long this will go on. My friend is sure that the case is false and he can easily come out of it. But how to expedite things. Is there a higher authority in the court itself to whom my friend can complain? Or can he complain to the High Court?
durgaprasad
26 January 2016 at 14:36
helo sir,
i am durga prasad my girl friend filed case under 354 D, on 22/10/2013.
that was disposed by the honorable court on 05/11/2014.
surprisingly she made same complaint with almost same allegations she filed one more case on 15/01/2015 under section 354 D (2),
now i came to know that the word double jeopardy, but not able to under stand, can i get any relief under this double jeopardy?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Complaint u/s 138 NI act
A case was filed against accused under 138 NI Act for his cheque worth Rs . 10 Lacs was dishonoured . Accused and Complainant entered into compromise. Accused agreed in the Hon ' ble court to pay the amount in two equal installments to the complainant. Subsequently Hon ' ble court passed an order that since both the parties entered into a compromise and accused agreed to pay the amount . Hence accused was ordered to pay the first installment of Rs . 5 Lacs on 15 th of November, 2015 and the second installment of Rs . 5 Lacs on 15 th of December , 2015 and case was disposed off . The accused did not pay the said amount to the complainant till date. Now what is the remedy left with complainant. Should complainant go for Review petition? If so , under which rule of law . Plz suggest the proper way out