arunkumark
23 February 2016 at 09:33
Assault case came up for hearing after a gap of 15 yrs.(ipc 326/324/504 etc state case.)four of the prosecution witness are dead and io is retired and not traceable also medical officer from govt hospital is also not traceable.Only the complainant and his wife is there to support the prosecution case.The complainant in his cross examination made some mistakes.He said that he was unconscious for 12 hours till 8 th august 2001 and after that his statement was recorded.But the statement date is 7 th august 2001 and it is also endorsed by mo that the pw1 was conscious at the time of his statement.He also says that there were 20/30 people present at the time of assault by iron rod 2 ft long on his head. The injury certificate mentions wound size 1x1x1 cm and not mentioned as grievous injury.He also said i was hit by iron rod which is 2 to 2.5 ft long from the distance of 2 ft. Technically it is not possible to hit on head from distance of 2 ft with 2 ft long rod.our hand itself is 2 ft long.He also said he was discharged from hospital on 9 th aug but the certificate shows date of discharge as 10 th aug.The pp on behalf of the state can say that this is the improvement of the prosecution story? or it gives advantage to the defence lawyer.I think it is very difficult to prove 326 ipc beyond reasonable doubt for the trial court.The prosecution witnesses mentioned in the fir also not supporting the prosecution story and one of them is already dead.Only hope of trial court judge using his discretionary power to punish the culprit.Please advise .
Anindo Mukherjee
23 February 2016 at 09:22
To,
Ld. Members of the forum;
Can someone provide me with the model specimen of FIRST APPEAL to be filed before the NCDRC (National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission) against a decree passed by State Consumer Commission. Please furnish a model specimen of a interlocutory application also.
Thanks and Regards:-
Anindo Mukherjee
V. Rajendran
23 February 2016 at 06:39
I took a Reliance wi-fi datacard connection in Chennai in October, 2015. Within a few days, I found the service to be totally unsatisfactory and mailed to Reliance on 11-12-2015 that the service was unsatisfactory and I wanted to stop the service. Without caring for my intimation for stopping the service, they continued to raise the bill even today and asking me to clear the outstandings before taking action to stop service. This is ridiculous and I am just thinking of taking it up with the appropriate Consumer Redressal Forum. Kindly advise.
Deep P. Singh
23 February 2016 at 00:57
I am an officer employed at a leading Public Sector Undertaking. I was heading towards my unit head's office, when two persons (one serving staff, the other one a retired personnel) confronted , hurled abuses and manhandled me, within the office premises. They also threatened to kill me, if I do not stay away from testimony in a case of assault on another officer.They did so, as, I am an eye-witness in a case of assault on another officer by one of the assaulters.
I filed written complaint with my Unit Head, leading to suspension of the Serving staff. I have also filed an FIR with police, on these two assaulters. The police have instituted a case u/s-341/353/323/504/506 of IPC against the accused.
1. There are two eye-witnesses from my side, besides a police officer who saved me from the assaulters. So, will that be sufficient to prove charges on the accused?
2. How to set grounds for punishment/arrest u/s 353, as one of the accused is staff, another one is a retired employee.?
3. Would I require direct evidence like video footage to conclusively prove the charges, as there is no cctv camera installed in the office premises (place of occurance)?
4.An FIR under sc/st Act against one of the accused (the retired personnel) has already been filed by another officer few weeks ago. Does this fact make my case stronger in any manner.
RAVINDHAR
22 February 2016 at 22:33
My frd working as a teacher in Pvt school. But he's decided to study llb course.. After became a lawyer he can do both work at the same time???
RAVINDHAR
22 February 2016 at 22:07
Sir pls tell the future of advocate and what are the department available in the advocate professional... After course competing we can work in part time
AK GAUR
22 February 2016 at 21:39
Dear Sir,
On the advise of two officers, I have sent blank cheques to my immediate officer for getting his signatures through my head office so that statutory/ routine payments can be cleared immediately with the signatures of other signatory.
It has been treated as "high degree of negligence in performance of duties and irresponsible behaviour".
Kindly advise how to reply this explanation?
RAVINDHAR
22 February 2016 at 21:35
One boy wish to study L.L.B but his status was poor to pay the college fees . If u know any institution will offered any free Law course??? He has belongs to S.C category..
Anonymous
22 February 2016 at 21:00
Dear sir,
I want to start autonomous institutions in tamil nadu, I plan to start vocational courses and provide franchise like nursing, Hotel Management, computer, beautician and others under which government Act, please guide me and give your suggestions I want to know how can i reg.
By
Annai Madhammal Trust
Phone 8883336699
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Lease deed
We being Lessee;A registered lease deed was executed for 10 years with lessor .That applicable Stamp Duty for 10 yeares rent amount was paid and the said lease deed was registered in the office of Sub-Registrar Raipur.
That last month the lessor sold the premises to another whereby the new lessor crept in. The new lessor is ready & willing to abide by the same terms and condition of the registered lease deed as executed.
Query:
With such change in lessor do we need to execute fresh registered lease deed and again pay the applicable stamp duty of remaining 7 years or is there is any other registered instrument. The lessee is nationaliseb Bank and for it registered instrument is nessary. Sub-registrar office says with change in lessor the lease goes and thus new lese deed with the new lessor. Lessee says when we have already paid the applicable stamp duty for total ten days why we should again pay for the same,pl opine.Thanks