My father bought one land and written on MY Mom Name in 1969. My Dad got patta too. Now when my MOM is trying to do settlement Deed on my name , in EC someone had put one forged entry as if my MOM sold some PersonB.
Lawyer is still saying we can go with settlement Deed. Is that the right way or legally allowed by Sub REgister on settlement Deed?
Thanks for helping on this question in advance
My prayer goes like this:
Based on the comprehensive response provided in Petitioner’s earlier statement to this OA, it is evident that there are numerous contested facts in this case. It is important to note that the very nature of this OA suggests fraudulent collaboration between the 1st Respondent/Applicant Bank and the 2nd Respondent/ 3rd Defendant Builder. The truth behind their actions became apparent during the Cross Examination of the PW1. It is crucial to acknowledge that the property in question has been unlawfully fortified by the 1st Respondent/Applicant Bnak, in collusion with the 2nd Respondent/3rd Defendant Builder. Their primary objective appears to be prolonging and creating legal disputes with the intent of pressuring the Petitioners into relinquishing their rights to the property.
5. The 1st Respondent/Applicant Bank illegally seized the property in August 2009 without following the appropriate legal procedures. The present OA was filed by the 1st Respondent/Applicant Bank in October 2011. Despite more than a decade has passed since the OA was filed, the status of the property remains unclear. Furthermore, the KG Marina Owners Association is not granting the Petitioners access to the area of the flat in the apartment, which has led to the Petitioner harboring doubts that the property may have already been liquidated.
6. It is therefore just and necessary in the principles of Natural Justice for this Hon’ble Tribunal to kindly permit the Petitioners/Defendants 1&2 in this case to undertake the following actions:
a) Appoint a commissioner to verify and ascertain the status of
the flat at xxxxxxxx, within the apartment premises.
b) Determine the name, address, and identity of the individual who
collected the original Sale Deed No:xxxxxxx from the records of
the Sub-Registrar Office (SRO).
c) Assess the present value of the flat through an Authorized
Government Valuer to determine its current worth.
These requests are vital to ensure a fair and just resolution of this case, adhering to the principles of Natural Justice.
Please guide can I file this IA in DRT
Due to constant leakage, the structure of the bldg was getting weak n top floor occupant were facing sever problem. The bldg committee decide to built a permanent shade to prevent as above mentioned.
Now we have received a notice to dismantle the shade due to a complaint from one the member of society. What is the best solution for this
What kind of construction or modifications in the common passage are considered illegal
I had booked a property with a company called Signature Global through a broker. At the time of booking, the broker had informed me that they would receive a 5% commission of the total property amount, which was approximately 3.2 lakh rupees. The broker had also promised to transfer the money to me once he received it and asked the me to pay them whatever they deemed appropriate.
However, the broker has not yet transferred the promised commission to me even though they received it on January 20, 2023. Despite repeated requests for payment, the broker has given the person different excuses and has not paid them the commission as promised. The broker had initially informed me that they were working for a company called "X," but later revealed that they had left that company and started their own business. The money was transferred to the broker's company account, but the owner of the company is not giving the money to the person.
"I don't have anything in written yet but the broker told me that if it is required I can give you in written and you can file a complaint regarding the company which got the amount"
Could anyone advise me on what I can do?
I bought a property of 5.44 acres in 2008 in Andhra, in 2010 I sold 4.34 acres to a buyer due to personal reasons. Then I was left with 1.10 acres still belonging to me, the entries in the Land Passbook, Adangal and 1 B form is correctly depicted. The survey numbers were subdivided after the execution of the above sale deed accordingly.
Later, the buyer to whom I had sold the 4.34 acres of land has sold the same to the second buyer in 2012 and I had nothing to do with that naturally.
Now, in 2021 when I went for an regular update of my records and to get the land sketch done,
I was shocked to see the following differences:
1. There are total of 4 survey numbers for the 1.10 acres that I own, in that 3 survey numbers are reflecting the second buyers name and I am left with .30 cents! that is on the subdivided new survey numbers!
2. I have the online EC up to date with me which shows no transactions regarding these survey numbers.
3. I have all the Original sale deeds, Mother deeds, Link documents etc intact still on my name with me.
4. How could this second buyers name reflect on the updated Adangal and 1B when I still have my registered documents?
5. Is this a mistake from the Data entry people who have missed the sub divided number/alphabets? I have been running around the sub-registrar office and even appealed in the Sub-Collectors office for the same for past 1.5 years, nobody has a clue. what could have gone wrong?
In a case, The defendant was ordered by the court to pay a rent of Rs 30K to the petitioner, and on default, contempt proceedings can be initiated by the Petitioner. Now for the last 5 years, the defendant paid the rent to the petitioner. Now defendant died. As per the decree, the petitioner has a right to file contempt proceedings against the defendant. But the defendant is deceased. Can the petitioner file this suit against the legal heir of the defendant?
Now, if the petitioner files the suit, does he need to move an application for bringing legal heirs on record under ORDER XXII, CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE?
I am confused by the fact that 1) No suit can be filed against a dead man 2) If we add a legal heir then does the application need to be filed for bringing legal heirs on record under ORDER XXII, CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - What I Understand is Order XXII is applicable when a party dies during the pendency of the suit. But in this case, the suit is disposed of, however, the defendant in his death is violating the order of the court and the contempt suit that which the petitioner is willing to file is not an ongoing suit. It is a fresh suit.
This is for all those who have lost dearly trading binary options, mostly when you are sure that your broker has been scamming you out of tons of cash, its normal for you to feel confused and down but i can assure that this was the same case with me but i was lucky to meet with Mr. Aaron Gabriel, his a computer wizard and he helped get 80% of my funds back in no less that 48hours i am so grateful. I think someone else might need his help that is why i have to leave this post here as a sign of gratitude for his job well done, feel free to contact him via: Aarongabriel310@gmail. com Please mention that you were referred by me so he can attend to you immediately, because he his been careful of imposters and spy's
Advise on fema
Dear sir,
I need advise, whether we can pay local payment in USD. Vendor registered in india and purchase invoice will be issued in USD.
for contract execution outside india.