LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

manoj joshi   07 October 2016 at 19:34

N I act

Can accused compound his case of n I act on first date of hearing without the consent of complainant ? How ? Any case law

M.Susairaj   07 October 2016 at 19:32

Possession of two voter id

Can possession of two voter ID in two states alone disqualify a person from contesting in a local body election. If not when he will suffer disqualification from contesting in local body election.

Relevant provision of the act is needed

SHYAMSUNDER BUBNA   07 October 2016 at 19:24

Conveyance of property by builder

ONE BUILDING OF GROUND AND 18 FLOORS HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN 1982 BY A BUILDER IN POSH AREA OF BOMBAY. HE HAVE TAKEN A BIG AMOUNT AS DEPOSIT AND ADVANCE FROM SOCIETY. HE HAVE NOT RETURNED THE SAID AMOUNT TILL DATE THOUGH HE OWNS A FLAT IN THE NAME OF HIS WIFE, HIMSELF AND HIS SON. HE HAVE ALSO NOT EXECUTED ANY CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY IN THE NAME OF SOCIETY.
ANY ACTION CAN BE TAKEN AGAINST HIM FOR RECOVER THE ADVANCES TAKEN BY HIM.
WHETHER HE AND/OR HIS FAMILY MEMBER CAN STOOD OR APPLY FOR MANAGING COMMITTEE MEMBER.
ANY ACTION CAN BE TAKEN IN COURT FOR NOT EXECUTING CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY IN THE NAME OF SOCIETY IF YES WHAT ACTION CAN BE TAKEN.

VIJAY RAGHAV   07 October 2016 at 15:32

Cheating

Sir,

My father (he is no more) has purchased a land (near Uppal, Hyderabad) of 190 sq.yrds in 1999. When i tried to sell it recently, i found the below

1. As per approved gram panchayat (now municipality) was showing 162 Sq.yards
2. Physical land is only 153 sq.yards.

When i tried to approach the person who sold, i came to know that some part of neighbours plot is also belong to ours to make it 190 sq.yards but the same has not been mentioned in the my registered deed.

I requested that person to sign the ratification deed so that i can correct the papers now but he is not willing to do so. Can we file any criminal/civil case against him? Please suggest

cddevaraj   07 October 2016 at 15:32

Claims of original deed

Respected Sir,we have traced now 70 years old my grandfather purchased sale deed of 4 Acres revenue land, now the land in the possession of others and they are forming, all the years we don't now this deed, we can claim
Shankar

Dilshad M. Merchant   07 October 2016 at 14:54

Civil writ petition

My name is Dilshad Merchant.
I have filed civil writ petition in Bombay high court.
In my case status online it is showing 'due section ' since last 3 dates.
I want to know meaning of :
1) due section (d/s)
2) CMIS
kindly let me know.
Thanks.

Varun Mishra   07 October 2016 at 13:48

Consumer court case to be filed against Jaypee

I booked a flat in Jaypee buddha circuit studio apartment on April, 13, till now no construction has happened there. On 01/02/16, I gave a letter to Jaypee asking them to refund my entire money with interest. Jaypee confirmed me on my mail to pay the entire amt with 12% interest within 6 months i.e by 09/16. Till now Jaypee has only refunded Rs 2.5 lacs and now saying we don't have funds.

I've to lodge a case against Jaypee in consumer court to get my money with 12% interest.

Please let me know the process.

Regards.

Varun Mishra
9810800594

Amit sharma   07 October 2016 at 13:29

Property dispute

Respected sir...i purchased a house on court agreement as registry is banned in cantonment area by govt 4 yr back.... she purchased this house in 1998 through legal sale deed registry... now a nri given police complaint against both of us of illegal occuping his house...police giv us clean chit of no forgery as this is civil nature case in its report.. nri claimed that it was his father house and other brother didnt giv his share while selling.. still nri didnt move in court but wat should i do to get rid of this problem..nri has no paper to prove his part ...police enuiry revealed that house was once transferred in his father name in land record in 1995....thereafter land record shows change of owner two tyms. And tax is also not of his father name....plz guide me...thanx

Krishna   07 October 2016 at 13:17

Accident case- help

I met an accident in 2014. An autorickshaw hit my car. Passenger sitting in autorickshaw was minorly injured. I too got injured. Autorickshaw driver ran away from the spot as he was at fault. Passenger sitting in autorickshaw and me went to the Civil Hospital. We both got the treatment in the hospital and discharged with in 10 minutes from the Hospital. Passenger sitting in autorickshaw demanded money from me. I simply refused to give the money as i was not at fault. After 1 month of accident, I came to know that passenger sitting in autorickshaw has filed an FIR u/s 279 and 337 of IPC. In that FIR it is written that i hit the autorickshaw and ran away from the spot. But the truth is that i too got a treatment in Civil Hospital and i have also call details that i have called a PSI of police station. PSI of police station has also reached the civil Hospital and as i refused to pay money to autorickshaw. He with collusion of PSI filed an wrong FIR against me. Now i have a received a summons from the court. I have seen all the documents in the court. Now PSI has not filed a treatment report of mine in the court as it will go against him as i have not ran way from the spot. Now my lawyer is advising me to accept the offence and get free with some bucks of penalty. What should i do
1) shall i accept the offence? if yes, what impact it will have in future
2) shall i file quashing petition in the high court on the basis the PSI has filed wrong FIR alongwith all documents.
3) shall i file discharge application in the trial court on the basis the PSI has filed wrong FIR alongwith all documents.
4) shall i face the trial

ADVOCATE TRILOK   07 October 2016 at 12:29

Effect of void agreement.

Directors of a pvt ltd co entered into an agreement with a finance co seeking loan. However there is a condition in the agreement the said directors are personally liable.

Now the problem is there is default and original directors have changed.

1) Under the co law the directors can not take personal liability for the co. and

2) there are no permanent directors.

Since the liability is only against the company whether the liability against the directors can be termed as illegal and they are not liable.