Anonymous
01 July 2023 at 16:26
Dear Seniors,
One dispute raised in labour court under wages act 1936, employer not paid salary to his employee, Now employer give application in court that employee salary is more than 24000 hence it can not be considered under wages act 1936 so reject the dispute.
Now I want experts guidance about the case that how & what we should reply to court for consideration and judgement in favour of employee. this case under trail since last 2 years.
Humble request to all seniors and experts please share your opinion.
Thanks
jknksk143
01 July 2023 at 14:36
Respected Sir,
How are you? Hope you are doing well and good.
My Cousin have Interior Decoration Company license (Proprietorship) registered in Andhra Pradesh which is currently not in function due to his health issues. Now, he would like to start IT related company in the same license along with the same activity of Interior Decoration. So, he would like to know whether he can add the IT activity in the same license or should he have to register new license for this IT activity in Andhra Pradesh. I request you to kindly advise me on this. Looking forward for your valuable advise which would be highly appreciated.
Anonymous
01 July 2023 at 14:17
My brother has been convicted and is in jail. But his appeal in the higher court has been admitted and will come up for hearing next month. In the meantime can he apply for bail and be released from custody.
Anonymous
01 July 2023 at 13:55
We are a training institute and recently we received 74 DDS against the student admissions worth 70 Lakhs through a consultant. However after depositing we came to know that all the DDs were fake. Now bank has seized our account. Although we are making an FIR. We are supposed to be the victim. How can we be affected legally? please guide
khurana
01 July 2023 at 09:47
Filed a criminal WP in High Court against Police inaction seeking directions to CJM.
However received a Defects Cure mail to service a Notice on Respondents
Would be honored if one of the legal Expert expert could provide advice on the issue whether a Petitioner in Person can service a SCN on a CJM as he being the Respondent ?
Soing Shade
01 July 2023 at 07:11
I`m happy sharing this experiences to testify about a great and powerful spell caster, my husband left me and the kids for 2 weeks when i called him he didn't pick up when he came back home the 3rd week he told me he wanted a divorce i was so sad i cried all night he left again i was so lonely the next day i was searching for something online when i found a spell caster called DR PETER who have helped so many people with their problems so i contacted him with my problems he told me it will take 24 hours and my husband will be back to me i did everything he told me to do and the next day my husband came back kneeling and begging he canceled the divorce we are now happy together DR PETER can help you too Email him at drpeterspellcaster21@gmail.com
bkp1
30 June 2023 at 18:16
I and my wife live in a Flat in a Condominium, comprising 6 Flats in Pune. We are both Senior Citizens. The Flat is in my wife's name. My queries are:
(a) Is there any provision by which the ownership can now be changed to Joint Names?
(b) Since this is not a Co-op Housing Society and Shares / Nominations are not there for the Flat, is making a Will the simplest way of ensuring that after her the Flat passes on to me, and if I precede her, to our son? If yes, does the Will necessarily need to be registered AND probated for a Flat located in Pune?
The objective is to ensure that after us, the Flat legally passes on to our son. Guidance on the simplest process appreciated
Anonymous
30 June 2023 at 15:18
QRMP dealer has not filed GSTR3B for March 23 returns. When will department cancel GST suomoto . After 1st July or due date of filing reurns, 22th July. please clarify
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Use of common pathway which has been extended
My father brought a land 13 years ago. When the land was purchased, the owner gave us a pathway from main road to our land which was 20 feet (touching south-west corner). At the time of our purchase, he did not sell any other part of his property. The 20 feet pathway was the only accessible to us and that pathway stops at the begining of our land and does not goes further. After few years, he divided his land which was behind our land and sold them to other parties. Furthermore he has extended that 20 feet pathway till the end of his land, so that the other parties can use that pathway. Now the problem is my land at the south is 25 meters length. The pathway that is given to us is only 6 meters south-west. From the 7th meter till 25th meter he has built a wall so that i don't build a gate or use that path. We requested him to remove the wall, since outside our land is the common path which he has extended for the parties behind. However he refuses. Please advise. Is it legal for me to ask him to remove that wall which he has built in the common path, though in document its not mentioned?