Anonymous
13 July 2017 at 14:16
A consumer, having contact demand of 499 KVA (admittedly such High Tension Over Head line was disconnected in September, 2016), allegedly committed theft of electricity in November, 2016 and the inspecting team of WBSEDCL, without police force, found 10.4 KW load was consumed by the consumer through PVC wire (2x150 ft) from a nearby Low Tension Over Head Line having maximum capacity to provide 63 KVA load and such PVC wire along with hooking device has been seized. On the date of inspection i.e. November, 2016 TOD meter room of WBSEDCL in the consumer's premises was under proper seal, done by WBSEDCL at the time of disconnection in September, 2016.
Proceeding u/s 135 initiated, accused got bail.
Assessing Officer u/s 126 has considered 499 KVA for final assessment u/s 126(3) and Appellate Authority u/s 127 has affirmed such assessment.
Regulation 5.1 of West Bengal Electricity Supply Code Regulation, 2003 provides for assessment u/s 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and provides "load found at the time of inspection or contact demand whichever is higher" is to be taken into account for such assessment.
Now question is whether in the present facts and circumstances applicability and / or validity of Regulation 5.1 can be challenged, as WBSEDCL has no capacity to provide 499 KVA supply through 63 KVA transformer.
Requires expert opinion along with supported judgement, if any.
Anonymous
13 July 2017 at 13:31
There's a friend of mine , a girl of age around 18yrs... Navneet ,a boy of 23+yrs has been pressurising her to marry him .
She's actually his relative...
The boy named Navneet is actually her elder cousin's husband's brother.
Is there any way she can protect herself from that boy even if her family supports the boy not her. ..
And is it possible that they can marry (as per the hindu marriage act in the indian constitution )
What shall she do to protect herself without letting that person know...
Kindly help...with all questions
shankar dharma kulla
13 July 2017 at 12:47
I stay in mumbai and have three children who stay in valsad with my wife. from past three years. I work as a uber cab driver and able to run the basic needs require in the family. At present I stay in with my aunts in andheri east.
My permanent address is at khar east where my mother alone live. My wife has applied in court for the basic requirement as in money. But she is not willing to come ans stay with me and my mother's house. I was ex railway employee due to some basic reason I was expel from the service. She is not demanding for divorce nor willing to stay with me. My in law (her brother) is married and have the one kid of one years. he has force her to not to stay with me.
Should I forward to take child custody matter to the court or suggest me the situation. My first son id ten years old and studying in 6th at valsad second is in studying in 1st at valsad and last daughter is 3 years in nursery at valsad.
I want all the kids should stay with me at mumbai and i will take better care for them. My wife is jobless and she is depend on her mother's family pension but she stay with her brother mother and sister in law. Also her health is unwell forever. She apprached to the local Mahila Mandal . Allthe concers ladies were against me for this solvent matter. Kindly suggest me the case and help me.
GOVINDARAJ
13 July 2017 at 12:25
Can i make different wills each one for self acquired,ancestral,and combined (bought in my name and my brother)
minsal
13 July 2017 at 12:15
sirs,
in a civil summary suit a lawyer filed his vakalatnama for defendant without paying sufficient court fee. the said vakalatnama is under objection even after few months and he has filed an application for dismissal of suit supporting by a judgment of Hon'ble high court that the plaintiff failed to file summons for judgment in the suit for more than six month.
Does the lawyer have a locus standi to represent the defendant and to file such an application?
Anonymous
13 July 2017 at 10:07
I am newly practicing lawyer. I had filed a bail application on behalf of my friend. For FIR us 420/34/174a
I was ready with the arguments based on the FIR. But the opposite counsel only argued on the orders issued by Sessions as well has high court who dismissed the AB. Now hes in custody for more than a month and the order of the magistrate was based onthe only contentions that AB was rejected.
Now when I will file appeal in sessions court the opposite counsel would again argue onthe AB orders.
What could be done here?
Inderpal Singh
13 July 2017 at 09:25
After passing conviction order and before sentencing can MM compound the offense and accept settlement between the parties or we have to go to session court. In my case MM has said he will accept the compromise and asked me to submit settlement letter after giving a date
Anonymous
13 July 2017 at 07:49
Hello:
My husband passed away without making a will. I have a son and a daughter. I have obtained Surviving Member Certificate. With this certificate we three become owners for the property. I need to know:
a) How should I proceed for mutation of property?
b) How to change name in the property tax payment in corporation
c) I would like to make a will so that If I die, I dont want my children fighting as to what belongs to them.
Please guide accordingly.
Thanks
ajithkumar.t
13 July 2017 at 06:50
A chritable society formed by Govt of kerala for health services
Whether GST applies to the society
If it runs a pharmacy in house, what is the GST implication
Whether TDS sec.51 applies to the society
Whether Tender document sale and scrap sale any GST
Then what is the rate and how can they remit without registration
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Admitted signs
My client sister had brought a forged will dated 15.11.2007 to of her father filed a suit in court . We have certified copy of evidence given by will maker in the same court in another case on 03.12.2004 and 14.12.2004.now my question is can ask for document examination with forensic expert .do these evidence copies will be useful as admitted signs . Or they rejected for long gap between 2004 to 2007 for signature verification .but The will maker died in 2010