Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   21 November 2017 at 00:28

Mother made a settlement to daughter and says both will

Sir, Husband made a settlement of property to wife in 2012. He cancelled the settlement in 2014 due to misunderstanding with wife. But wife made a settlement of land to her daughter in 2014 stating that both mother and daughter can use the property together and after my death the property full right to daughter. Meanwhile Husband and wife applied for a divorce and got separated Sep 2015 with a judgment stating that husband understand that property has been given to daughter. He agreed. Judgment statement is mother has no right to ask for the property. But final sentence says that this property was given to Daughter and wife based on daughter good will purpose only. Judgment itself some contradiction is there.
My lawer says, settlement means there should not be a will. So this property can not be sale until mother death. Only After death of mother/wife, the property belongs to daughter.
My question is, shall I buy this property.? Will there be any encumbrance after some years by the above people.?
I am expecting answers please.
regards
r.kalimuthu

4WhatIsRight   20 November 2017 at 22:51

Tenant involved in violation of pollution norms

I recently let out a small space in my plot to a person against receipt of caution deposit by cheque.
Yesterday pollution control board officials visited the premises occupied by tenant.
Tenant wasn't present.
They said that tenant has violated pollution norms by discharging hazardous waste in common drainage.
They asked me about details of tenant which o provided.
They also gave me a notice to provide details.
I reported the entire matter to local p.s. and pollution control board along with all details about tenant.
Now I have learnt that they (PCB) have chosen to ignore all information provided by me and have lodged complaint in my name.
I am being told by few officials that I may be arrested for violations done by my tenant.
I am a lady senior citizen and have no male heirs.
How do I go about it?
Whom shall I approach?
I have other tenants in same premises who are willing to testify that the space in question is in possession of the said tenant.
To whom shall they make submission?

Anonymous   20 November 2017 at 22:36

Can i write a letter to high court judge

CAN I WRITE MY PROBLEM TO HIGH COURT JUDGE

ALL OFFIERS ARE NOT RESPONDING FOR MY PROBLEM AND THEY ARE GIVING FALSE ANSWERS

Mahesh Revelle   20 November 2017 at 22:08

For quash 417,420,376,506 ipc

It is respectfully submitted that the 1st respondent alleged to have been lodged a report to the 2nd respondent police station on 29.7.2015 stating that she and the petitioner are working as Police Constables in I.T. Cell in Cyberabad Police Commissionerate. It is alleged that the petitioner made the 1st respondent promised her to marry and made her to believe him. It is alleged that on 11.7.2015, the petitioner and the 1st respondent went to Yadagirigutta Temple on a bike, where he booked a room without her knowledge and raped her and promised that he will marry. It is further alleged that the petitioner made a phone call to the 1st respondent and said that marriage engagement was completed with his relative girl and that he and his family members threatened her to kill, if she disclose anything to any one. Basing on the said allegations, the police registered the FIR and subsequently filed the charge sheet. 2. It is respectfully submitted that the alleged offence under Section 376 IPC, according to the 1st respondent was occurred on 11.7.2015, whereas, she made report to the police station on 29.7.2015. Therefore, there is an abnormal delay in lodging the report to the police station. Further, the medical report also certified that there is no evidence of recent sexual intercourse. There is also contradictory statements of the 1st respondent from complaint to the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C (. On the ground of abnormal delay and in absence of the medical report, the essential ingredients under Section 376 IPC do not attract, therefore, the proceedings relating to the said offence are liable to be quashed. ( Is it possible or not ?) 3. Now her marriage was fixed and both are agreed to compromise as for CrPC 482.. But her layer is misguided her it's not possible, future problems will happen in personal life and services Maters. Please clarify

Thrishul   20 November 2017 at 20:08

Punishment for removal of survey stones

My neighbor removed survey stones.he himself had signed on the survey report before.i informed to mro still no acyion taken.what is the punishment for removal of survey stones . place of incidence Hemavati village,Amarapur mandal,Anantpur,AP.
My neighbor has already constructed a hotel in that property.

Ramkrishna   20 November 2017 at 19:40

Drainage

Sir,
While laying down storm water drainage the GHMC has connected sewage lines into it, it's giving foul smell and now we are having mosquitoes menance, few people in our street are already affected with dengue fever, and other mosquitoes related disease's. We have been running around the concerned authorities but nothing has been done.

Harry   20 November 2017 at 18:13

Property attached wrongly

There was a road accident case in which the court gave orders to attach property of accused and compensate victim's family. However victim's family got property of some other person attached, the name of the person whose property was attached and his fathers name were similar that of accused and his father. Now they have received summons that their property is attached in road accident case and will be auctioned. Do they need to join as a party to the case and appeal for staying auction or there is any other procedure through which they can ensure the court that they are not the ones who were involved in that accident case?

SDB   20 November 2017 at 16:47

Non compliance of execution order passed by consumer court

Dear experts
We sued our builder for want of occupation certificate. The consumer Court favoured us and ordered the builders to provide us the OC. There was no appeal from their side. Nor did they comply. We filed execution order and at the date of hearing only the counsel appeared before the judge. The judge issued bailable warrant against each of builders partners and next hearing date was October 2017. All the parties appeared and the judge again gave them 14.11.17 as new date for compliance

On 14.11.2017 again only one of the five partners appeared and started arguing why should they pay penalty for availing OC. The original judge was absent and thus a temporary judge presided over. She again gave a new date ie. 29.11.17 for hearing

My questions:
1) what is the next step and why court keeps on postponing the action
2) what remedy does the builder has. How can he be so adamant
3) what remedy do we have

Anonymous   20 November 2017 at 15:03

Is it possible that one advocate file case form both side

In Case of Divorce advocate of both side are same

G Saravanan   20 November 2017 at 12:23

Pay fixation

Sir

I was a Steno C before as Dec. 2006 and my date of increment was February 2007. Based on the Department of Expenditure up-gradation order, my pay was to be fixed w.e.f 1st February 2007, in the scale from Rs.5500-9000/- to Rs.6500-10500/- with effect from 15.9.2006, based on option exercise by me. But, after I qualified in the Section Officers Examination and nomination was also made by DOPT, I chose to join as Section Officer in December, 2006 (before my next date of increment viz., February, 2007). After joining I gave my option to fix my pay w.e.f. February, 2007. But on DOPT's advice taken by my Office, my earlier option was treated as ceased to operate and my pay was fixed in the new post of Section Officer under the normal pay fixation rules (with notional pay). But they took my pay in the previous post as on 15th September, 2007 (as per up-gradation) as the basis, but not my pay in the previous post w.e.f. my date of increment viz., February, 2007. Is this right or not?