A.DEIVA NAYAKI
10 March 2018 at 15:07
Thanks sir... My father in law expired on1988 mother in-law expired on 1993 ..we had received heirship certificate from the the court for nine members..we have the govt patta copy.of said properties mentioning the nine persons names....allsters were married....all nine members are alive...there is a inconvenience for the abroad grand daughter and grandsons...we want to sell those properties by immediate registration not to make an agreement registration....is this possible....is there a need of presence of grandsons and grand daughters for signing at the time of registration ....the property is not an ancestral property....my grand father in law self earned one...please could you clear my doubts once again...thanks
Dhirender Wadhwa
10 March 2018 at 14:20
I am a part of a Non-monetary Help Group working in NCR basically for senior citizens, child education & medical help through teachers, doctors and volunteers comprising the group. My family has been taking care of monetory expenses, if any incurred in the works.
One year ago, I registered a Trust in Uttar Pradesh. My parents recently gifted a piece of land (their self acquired) to the trust (to build a home for homeless senior citizens) by a will. A friend of my father (a part of our volunteer group) also wants to gift a small plot (self acquired) of his to the trust for children home. Though all constructions will be carried on when we gather enough from our incomes (my family)
Please advise the legal papers and procedure to follow, so that least expenses are incurred (We don't take monetary donations and all expenses are borne by my family). Father's friend is in doubt regarding the will and wants to transfer the plot permanently as his two sons (well settled in other cities) have been trying to get hold of his properties by force and he (and we also) don't want any legal issues later.
Your expert advise would be of great help for us, as this would involve many lives in future.
Krishnaraj
10 March 2018 at 14:17
Hello sir,
I would like to know whether court can pass a interim stay order ( injuction ) without paying proper court fee by the plaintiff ? if No, kindly let me know the under which section .
Narration :
I have purchased a property through sale deed dated 06-01-2016, wherein 5 defendants have personally executed the document , and a Plaintiff was represented by a Defendant No 1 through GPA duly executed before the notory.
Now the plaintiff have approached the court for cancellation of ENTIRE SALE deed, and paid the court fee ONLY to the extant of 1/6 of his rights. The court has granted the interim relief to the plaint by passing the injection against me by 1) Putting up any construction, 2 ) Alienating the property , 3) creating encumbrance .
So, my point is can the court grant interim relief to the plaint for paying only 1/6th amount of the property as Court fee, wherein he asked for cancellation of entire Sale deed.
If No, kindly let me know under what section we can put forward our case.
Thankyou in advance.
Prakash R
10 March 2018 at 12:41
Hello Experts,
Yesterday, the Bar council of India declared results of All India Bar Exam - XI, conducted in Dec-2017. I have passed in the exam and now I have a few questions,
- Though, I have passed the exam, the certificate of practice(COP) is not yet issued by the BCI. I heard that it takes more than 6 months to issue the formal certificate.
- Now before receiving the COP, can I accept clients independently and sign the Vakalatnama ?
- Can I represent my clients in High Court also?
- Are there any restrictions in spite of passing the BCI exam?
Thanks in advance,
Prakash R
sonavnayak
10 March 2018 at 12:36
How can I file suit for damages in case of Breach of contract by a franchisor and arbitration clause
Anonymous
10 March 2018 at 12:18
Whether suit for specific performance of unregistered sale agreement is maintainable in tamilnadu
RESMI
10 March 2018 at 12:01
I purchased a property during last November. Total extent of property was 8.351 cents. Property was first purchase as UDS of 5.351 centsof land and ground floor in my name and uds of 3 cents and first floor in my wife's name. But at the time of registration there was a mistake in sale deed . Instead of 5.351 cents, they entered as 5.0351. We rectified the same by creating another sale deed for 0.316 cents. Thus full extent got transferred to our name( 3+5.0351+0.316= 8.351).At the time of first registration itself mutation was done for 8.351 cents by village officials. So we didn't go for mutation procedure at the time of second registration is for rectification of mistakes in extent. Now issue is village officials are saying since the property was purchased on undivided share basis mutation is done by adding our name to exiting thendaperu register instead of creating a new one and land tax receipt in future will be in the name of all the three including the sellers name. Is this rule correct. I purchased property on uds basis clearly mentioning both land and building share and this a residential property and not flat .Kindly advise
IQBAL
10 March 2018 at 11:38
Dear Sir,
Late brother's wife have done FIR against mother and brothers under dhara 522, 523 & 420.
That widow who has done FIR, is working in Railway on recommendation of my mother, brothers and sisters for the last 2 years.
She is working in another city.
My late brother's own property is under my mother possession.
As per Islamic rule, my mother has 1/6 right in property.But brother's wife did not give.
Even she did not give anything belonging to late brother where as mother has right 1/6 in materials and money left by late brother.
What should be next step from my mother?
How to proceed further as mother is 67 years old and heart patient?
Anonymous
10 March 2018 at 11:20
Hello this Bhavin S from Chembur-Mumbai , we are 10 family living in pagdi system . the landlord has proposed us with an redevelopment offer that is the the ownership rights and rent and existing area that is 220 sq ft after the redevelopment is done. we refused this offer as the tenants dint fill the offer was correct and justifying . after a few meetings with the landlord there was no resolution passed. then the landlord sent us and notice that has the following message : "1) the landlord has approached the tenants may times but no resolution was passed ,2) the sad building is more then 60 yrs old and need to be repaired or reconstructed. 3) therefore need to vacate the room within 7 days from the date of notice or legal action would be taken by the landlord .
Please suggest us what to do regarding getting fair benefits and redevelopment offers and what are the basic offers stated by law?
And how can we tackle this notice of vacate?
your replays are precious so please help me out .
Thank you in advance.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
District Consumer Forum' Daily Order - can it be reversed?
District Consumer Fourm' Daily order:
��������"� Today Is Fixed For Filing Written Version By OP No.1 As Last Chance, Id The Case Shall Proceed Ex-Parte Against OP No.1"
This is what the forum ordered after 45 days when no written version was presented even after OPs advocate sought time two times earlier.
I have information that OP has given written version to the Staff of the consumer court, after the daily order was issued. OP was not present in the court that day.
Now I have two questions:
1. Now since 65 days have passed since the receipt of the notice can court accept their written version? I have seen the Supreme court ruling about 45 days period. Also in Sept 2017 in a case supreme court has not accepted the written version after 45 days.
2. Since court has given a daily order that case shall proceed ex-pate against OP. Can the distric consumer court reverse its own earlier order? And accept the written version after 65 days of notice? I have read that only national commission can review it's order.
Kindly help me. Thanks in advance.